Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Making Smart Cities More Playable pp 107–128Cite as

From Smart City to Smart Engagement: Exploring Digital and Physical Interactions for Playful City-Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Gaming Media and Social Effects ((GMSE))

Abstract

Drawing on the collective knowledge, skills and creativity from a variety of top-down and bottom-up stakeholders is required to address the needs, wants and aspirations of people in the 21st century city. Collaboration and interaction in the city-making process is a key driver for both, the acquisition of skills and knowledge, as well as creativity and innovation. Novel ideas, specific skill sets and knowledge that contribute towards innovation, collaboration and creativity are increasingly based at the intersection of fields, disciplines and cultures. Government organisations and private enterprise have acknowledged that the involvement of both top-down and bottom-up stakeholders from a diverse range of backgrounds and cultures achieves more equitable city-making outcomes and supports communities in pursuing local identity and self-governance. This book chapter proposes to present a critical review of projects and installations that deployed situated digital technologies within public spaces, as a mechanism to engage passers-by into playful interactions. Additionally, examples of physical installations will also be discussed, such as urban art projects, yarn bombing and parkour that adopted DIY and guerrilla tactics to engage people in public spaces. Using the insights derived from the review, the book chapter will present a smart engagement framework for playful city-making consisting of digital and physical mechanisms for greater collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.welivehere2017.com.au.

  2. 2.

    Adapted from the Middle-Out Engagement framework [35, p. 214]

References

  1. Abelson J, Forest P-G, Eyles J et al (2003) Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc Sci Med 57:239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams D, Hardman M (2014) Observing guerrillas in the wild: reinterpreting practices of urban guerrilla gardening. Urban Stud 51:1103–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen M, Regenbrecht H, Abbott M (2011) Smart-phone augmented reality for public participation in urban planning. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Australian computer-human interaction conference. ACM

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anastasiu I (2019) Unpacking the smart city through the lens of the right to the city: a taxonomy as a way forward in participatory city-making. In: de Lange M, de Waal M (eds) The hackable city. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 239–260

    Google Scholar 

  5. Art Almanac (2014) Ian strange: final act. In: Art Almanac. http://www.art-almanac.com.au/ian-strange-final-act/

  6. Barnes (2013) Slumlord Project

    Google Scholar 

  7. Behrens M, Valkanova N, Schieck AF, Brumby DP (2014) Smart citizen sentiment dashboard: a case study into media architectural interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international symposium on pervasive displays. ACM, New York, pp 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bilandzic M, Johnson D (2013) Hybrid placemaking in the library: designing digital technology to enhance users’ on-site experience. Aust Libr J 62:258–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bisker S, Gross M, Carter D et al (2010) Personal, public: using DIY to explore citizen-led efforts in urban computing. In: CHI’10 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blowers A (2017) The limits of power: the politics of local planning policy. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burney E (2013) Making people behave: anti-social behaviour, politics and policy. Willan

    Google Scholar 

  12. Caldwell GA, Osborne L, Mewburn I, Crowther P (2015) Guerrillas in the [urban] midst: developing and using creative research methods-guerrilla research tactics. J Urban Technol 22:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Caldwell G, Guaralda M, Donovan J, Rittenbruch M (2016) The InstaBooth: making common ground for media architectural design. In: Proceedings of the 2016 media architecture Biennale. Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  14. Caldwell GA, Foth M (2014) DIY media architecture: open and participatory approaches to community engagement. In: Proceedings of the 2nd media architecture Biennale. ACM, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  15. Caragliu A, Del Bo C, Nijkamp P (2011) Smart cities in Europe. J Urban Technol 18:65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cornish C (2013) Impermanent structure: Ian strange on suburban. Open J. http://openjournal.com.au/ian-strange-impermanent-structure/

  17. Cuthill M (2003) The contribution of human and social capital to building community well-being: a research agenda relating to citizen participation in local governance in Australia. Urban Policy Res 21:373–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dalsgaard P, Halskov K, Wiethoff A (2016) Designing media architecture: tools and approaches for addressing the main design challenges. In: Proceedings of human factors in computing systems. ACM

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dačić A (2017) Could urban art be one of the most significant movements in recent art history? In: Widewalls. http://www.widewalls.ch/urban-art-movement/

  20. Deano (2015) Public Silo Trail

    Google Scholar 

  21. Djurichkovic A (2014) Ian strange transforms Christchurch earthquake zone. In: Art collector. http://www.artcollector.net.au/IanStrangetransformsChristchurchearthquakezone

  22. Dupe C (2017) Grain of truth in silo art project. The Western Australian

    Google Scholar 

  23. Falco E (2016) Digital community planning: the open source way to the top of Arnstein’s Ladder. Int J E-Planning Res 5:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Finn D (2014) DIY urbanism: implications for cities. J Urbanism 7:381–397

    Google Scholar 

  25. Form (2017) Public returns with a big scale art trail through regional Western Australia. In: Form. https://www.form.net.au/2017/08/media-release-public-returns-big-scale-art-trail-regional-western-australia/

  26. Foth M, Brynskov M, Ojala T (eds) (2015) Citizen’s right to the digital city. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  27. Foth M (2017) Lessons from Urban Guerrilla Placemaking for smart city commons. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on communities and technologies. ACM

    Google Scholar 

  28. Foth M, Adkins B (2006) A research design to build effective partnerships between city planners, developers, government and urban neighbourhood communities. J Community Inform 2

    Google Scholar 

  29. Foth M, Turner T (2017) Vote YES

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fredericks J, Caldwell G, Foth M, Tomitsch M (2019) The city as perpetual beta: fostering systemic urban acupuncture. In: de Waal M, de Lange M (eds) The hackable city: digital media & collaborative citymaking in the network society. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fredericks J, Caldwell GA, Tomitsch M (2016) Middle-out design: collaborative community engagement in Urban HCI. In: Proceedings of the annual conference of the Australian computer-human interaction special interest group. ACM

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fredericks J, Hespanhol L, Parker C et al (2018) Blending pop-up urbanism and participatory technologies: challenges and opportunities for inclusive city making. In: City, culture & society

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fredericks J, Tomitsch M (2017) Designing for self-representation: selfies, engagement and situated technologies. In: Proceedings of the annual conference of the Australian computer-human interaction special interest group. ACM

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fredericks J, Tomitsch M, Hespanhol L, McArthur I (2015) Digital pop-up: investigating Bespoke community engagement in public spaces. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Australian special interest group for computer human interaction. ACM, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fredericks J (2017) Middle-out design: enabling collaborative city making through digitally augmented pop-ups. The University of Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gapfiller (2012) Dance-O-Mat. In: Gapfiller. http://gapfiller.org.nz/project/dance-o-mat/

  37. Gardiner S (2017) Thousands turn out in Sydney for colourful rally to support same-sex marriage. The Sydney Morning Herald

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gordon E, Koo G (2008) Placeworlds: using virtual worlds to foster civic engagement. Space Cult 11:204–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gordon E, Manosevitch E (2010) Augmented deliberation: merging physical and virtual interaction to engage. New Media & Society

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gregory A (2004) The ethics of engagement in the UK public sector: a case in point. J Commun Manage 8:83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Head BW (2007) Community engagement: participation on whose terms? Aust J Polit Sci 42:441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hespanhol L, Davis H, Fredericks J et al (2018) The digital fringe and social participation through interaction design. J Community Inform 14:4–16

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hespanhol L, Tomitsch M, McArthur I et al (2015) Vote as you go: blending interfaces for community engagement into the urban space. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on communities and technologies. ACM, pp 29–37

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hoggenmüller M (2017) Hybrid media architecture

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hollands RG (2015) Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge J Reg Econ Soc 8:61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hosio S, Goncalves J, Kostakos V, Riekki J (2014) Exploring civic engagement on public displays. In: Saeed S (ed) User-centric technology design for nonprofit and civic engagements. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 91–111

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Hou J (2010) Insurgent public space: guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hurlston D (2013) Ian Strange: Suburban. In: NGV. https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/essay/ian-strange-suburban/

  49. Hénaff M, Strong TB (2001) Public space and democracy. Minnesota Press

    Google Scholar 

  50. Innes J, Booher D (2004) Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Plann Theor Pract 5:419–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Innocent T (2017) Bringing back an old idea for smart cities—playing on the street. The Conversation

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jacobs L, Cook FL, Carpini MX (2009) Talking together: public deliberation and political participation in America. University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  53. Johnston KA, Lane AB, Devin B, Beaston AT (2018) Episodic and relational community engagement: implications for social impact and social license. In: Handbook of communication engagement. Wiley & Blackwell Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kinchla R, Wolfe J (1979) The order of visual processing: “Top-down”, “bottom-up”, or “middle-out”. Percept Psychophysics 25:225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. King CS, Feltey KM, Susel BO (1998) The question of participation: toward authentic public participation in public administration. In: Public administration review, pp 317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kingham (2013) Ian Strange final act

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kinghorn (2012) Dance-O-Mat

    Google Scholar 

  58. Koeman L, Kalnikaité V, Rogers Y (2015) “Everyone Is Talking about It!”: a distributed approach to urban voting technology and visualisations. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 3127–3136

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lydon M, Bartman D, Woudstra R, Khawarzad A (2012) Tactical Urbanism. The street plans collaborative

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lydon M, Hartley L, Mengel A et al (2014) Tactical Urbanism 4. Street plans collaborative

    Google Scholar 

  61. Manstead AS (2018) The psychology of social class: how socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol 57:267–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. McLaverty P (2017) Public participation and innovations in community governance. Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  63. Morris A (2017) Residents of Sydney high-rise estate use lights to protest against gentrification. de zeen

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mould O (2014) Tactical urbanism: the new vernacular of the creative city. Geogr Compass 8:529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Nabatchi T, Leighninger M (2015) Public participation for 21st century democracy. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  66. Newman J, Barnes M, Sullivan H, Knops A (2004) Public participation and collaborative governance. J Soc Policy 33:203–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Parker C, Kay J, Baldauf M, Tomitsch M (2016) Design implications for interacting with personalised public displays through mobile augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays. ACM

    Google Scholar 

  68. Partidario MR, Sheate WR (2013) Knowledge brokerage-potential for increased capacities and shared power in impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 39:26–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Pinder D (2008) Urban interventions: art, politics and pedagogy. Int J Urban Reg Res 32:730–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00810.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Poldervaart S (2001) Utopian aspects of social movements in postmodern times: some examples of DIY politics in the Netherlands. Utopian Stud 12:143–163

    Google Scholar 

  71. Rawlinson C, Guaralda M (2012) Chaos and creativity of play : designing emotional engagement in public spaces. In: Out of control: proceedings of 8th international design and emotion conference

    Google Scholar 

  72. Reynolds R (2014) On guerrilla gardening: a handbook for gardening without boundaries. Bloomsbury Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  73. Rojo J, Harrington S (2013) Street art and activism with ‘The Slumlord Project’ in Baltimore. Huffington Post

    Google Scholar 

  74. Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci Technol Human Values 25:3–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2004) Evaluating public-participation exercises: a research agenda. Sci Technol Human Values 29:512–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Rubdy R, Alsagoff L (2013) The global-local interface and hybridity: exploring language and identity. Multilingual Matters

    Google Scholar 

  77. Sargeant C (2017) 27 gloriously creative signs from Sydney’s same-sex marriage rally. SBS News

    Google Scholar 

  78. Sarkissian W, Hofer N, Shore Y et al (2009) Kitchen table sustainability: practical recipes for community engagement with sustainability. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  79. Schroeter R, Foth M (2009) Discussions in space. In: Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the Australian computer-human interaction special interest group. ACM, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  80. Steinberger F, Foth M, Alt F (2014) Vote with your feet: local community polling on urban screens. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on pervasive displays. ACM, New York, pp 44:44–44:49

    Google Scholar 

  81. Tomitsch M, Ackad C, Dawson O et al (2014) Who cares about the content? An analysis of playful behaviour at a public display. In: In Proceedings of the PerDis’14. ACM, New York, pp 160–165

    Google Scholar 

  82. Tomitsch M, McArthur I, Haeusler MH, Foth M (2015) The role of digital screens in urban life: new opportunities for Placemaking. In: Citizen’s right to the digital city. Springer, Singapore, pp 37–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  83. Tomitsch M, Wrigley C, Borthwick M et al (2018) Design. Think. Make. Break. Repeat. A handbook of methods. BIS Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  84. Tomlinson J (2005) Cultural hybridity and international communication. In: Kraidy M (ed) Hybridity in cultural globalization. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  85. Tracey D (2009) Guerrilla gardening: a manualfesto. New Society Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  86. Valkanova N, Jorda S, Tomitsch M, Vande Moere A (2013) Reveal-it!: the impact of a social visualization projection on public awareness and discourse. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 3461–3470

    Google Scholar 

  87. Vlachokyriakos V, Comber R, Ladha K, et al (2014) PosterVote: expanding the action repertoire for local political activism. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on designing interactive systems

    Google Scholar 

  88. Wagner I, Basile M, Ehrenstrasser L et al (2009) Supporting community engagement in the city: Urban planning in the MR-Tent. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on communities and technologies. ACM

    Google Scholar 

  89. Webler T (1999) The craft and theory of public participation: a dialectical process. J Risk Res 2:55–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Wesner A (2015) Temporary urbanism and urban sustainability after a natural disaster: transitional community initiated open spaces in Christchurch, New Zealand. J Urbanism 8:406–422

    Google Scholar 

  91. Wholohan (2017) #WeLiveHere2017 Project

    Google Scholar 

  92. Wiethoff A, Hoggenmüller M (2017) Experiences deploying hybrid media architecture in public environments. In: Wiethoff A, Hussmann H (eds) Media architecture: using information and media as construction material. de Gruyter Mouton, pp 103–121

    Google Scholar 

  93. Wiredforlego (2013) Yarn bombing

    Google Scholar 

  94. Wouters N, Downs J, Harrop M et al (2016) Uncovering the Honeypot effect: how audiences engage with public interactive systems. In: Proceedings of DIS’16. ACM Press, pp 5–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Design Lab, Sydney School of Architecture, Design and Planning, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

    Joel Fredericks

Authors
  1. Joel Fredericks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Fredericks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Anton Nijholt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fredericks, J. (2020). From Smart City to Smart Engagement: Exploring Digital and Physical Interactions for Playful City-Making. In: Nijholt, A. (eds) Making Smart Cities More Playable. Gaming Media and Social Effects. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9765-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation