Advertisement

Economic, Social, and Environmental Significance of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)

  • Muhammad Mehedi MasudEmail author
Chapter
  • 181 Downloads

Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) have been established to protect, preserve, and shelter vulnerable and endangered marine life. These areas contribute substantially to reducing the degradation of coastal habitats and sea life, maintaining biodiversity, preventing the loss of marine species, increasing productivity, supporting ecological systems, and protecting the oceans. In particular, these areas serve as a safeguard of fish stocks. Conservation efforts have significant positive economic, sociocultural, and environmental impact on livelihoods, food security, income generation, as well as poverty reduction for coastal communities. MPAs form the cornerstone of a blue economy which contribute to sustainable development in coastal communities as well as for the national economy as a whole. It is therefore important to improve the understanding of MPAs’ importance among all stakeholders and local communities; only then can we conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources. In this regard, local communities play a key role to promote sustainable use of marine resources and our natural heritage. Thus, this chapter discusses the economic, social, and ecological importance of global MPAs.

Keywords

Economic Social Environmental significance 

References

  1. Akwilapo, F. (2007). A comparative study on marine protected areas between Australia and Tanzania. United Nations–The Nippon Foundation. Japan: James Cook University or International Ocean Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Boersma, P. D., & Parrish, J. K. (1999). Limiting abuse: Marine protected areas, a limited solution. Ecological Economics, 31(2), 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brander, L., Baulcomb, C., van der Lelij, J. A. C., Eppink, F., McVittie, A., Nijsten, L., et al. (2015). The benefits to people of expanding Marine Protected Areas. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: VU University.Google Scholar
  4. Bryant, D. E. (2011). The threat of non-indigenous marine species towards Tasmanian marine protected areas. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
  5. Cesar, H., Burke, L., & Pet-Soede, L. (2003). The economics of worldwide coral reef degradation. Cesar Environmental Economics Consulting (CEEC): WWF and ICRAN.Google Scholar
  6. Christie, P., Lowry, K., White, A. T., Oracion, E. G., Sievanen, L., Pomeroy, R. S., et al. (2005). Key findings from a multidisciplinary examination of integrated coastal management process sustainability. Ocean and Coastal Management, 48(3–6), 468–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cinner, J. E., & Bodin, Ö. (2010). Livelihood diversification in tropical coastal communities: A network-based approach to analyzing ‘livelihood landscapes’. PloS One, 5(8), e11999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahlgren C. (2014). Review of the benefits of no-take zones: A report to the Wildlife Conservation Society. https://appliedecology.cals.ncsu.edu/.
  9. Dixon, J. A., Scura, L. F., & van’t Hof, T. (1993). Meeting ecological and economic goals: Marine parks in the Caribbean. Ambio (Vol. 22, Nos. 2–3, pp. 117–125).Google Scholar
  10. European Environment Agency. (2015). Marine environment. www.eea.europa.eu/soer-2015/europe/marine-and-coastal. Accessed 21 Mar 2019.
  11. Ferrario, F., Beck, M. W., Storlazzi, C. D., Micheli, F., Shepard, C. C., & Airoldi, L. (2014). The effectiveness of coral reefs for coastal hazard risk reduction and adaptation. Nature Communications, 5, 3794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gell, F. R., & Roberts, C. M. (2003). Benefits beyond boundaries: The fishery effects of marine reserves. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18(9), 448–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grafton, J., Lillis, A. M., & Widener, S. K. (2010). The role of performance measurement and evaluation in building organizational capabilities and performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 689–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gubbay, S. (1995). Marine protected areas: Principles and techniques for management (pp. 232). London, UK: Chapman and Hall (17 National Research Council, Marine Protected Areas: Tools for sustaining Ocean Ecosystems, xi [Academy Press 2001]).Google Scholar
  15. Jaafar, M., & Maideen, S. A. (2012). Ecotourism-related products and activities, and the economic sustainability of small and medium island chalets. Tourism Management, 33(3), 683–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones et al. (2010). A brief summary of the Science & Technology Committee’s “ClimateGate” hearing. https://publicinterest.org.uk/jones-et-al-2010/. Accessed 21 Mar 2019.
  17. Lester, S. E., Halpern, B. S., Grorud-Colvert, K., Lubchenco, J., Ruttenberg, B. I., Gaines, S. D., et al. (2009). Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: A global synthesis. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 384, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mascia, M. B., Claus, C. A., & Naidoo, R. (2010). Impacts of marine protected areas on fishing communities. Conservation Biology, 24(5), 1424–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maritime Institution of Malaysia (MIMA). (2018). Status and options for Malaysia on biodiversity conservation beyond national jurisdiction. http://www.mima.gov.my/. Accessed 13 Mar 2019.
  20. Nadzir, N. M., Ibrahim, M., & Mansor, M. (2015). The impacts of Seri Tanjung Pinang Coastal reclamation on the quality of life of the Tanjung Tokong Community Penang, Malaysia. Global Science and Technology Journal, 3(1), 107–117.Google Scholar
  21. Ojeda-Benítez, S., Armijo-de Vega, C., & Marquez-Montenegro, M. Y. (2008). Household solid waste characterization by family socioeconomic profile as unit of analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(7), 992–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Olaniyi, A. O., Abdullah, A. M., Ramli, M. F., & Alias, M. S. (2012). Assessment of drivers of coastal land use change in Malaysia. Ocean and Coastal Management, 67, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Siry, H. Y. (2006). Decentralized coastal zone management in Malaysia and Indonesia: A comparative perspective. Coastal Management, 34(3), 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Souter, D. W., & Linden, O. (2000). The health and future of coral reef systems. Ocean and Coastal Management, 43(8–9), 657–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Spalding, M., Spalding, M. D., Ravilious, C., & Green, E. P. (2001). World atlas of coral reefs. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. UNEP. (2017). Frontiers 2017 emerging issues of environmental concern. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
  27. United Nation Sustainable Development. (2019). Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/oceans/. Accessed 13 Mar 2019.
  28. Van Beukering, P. J., Papyrakis, E., Bouma, J., & Brouwer, R. (Eds.). (2013). Nature’s wealth: The economics of ecosystem services and poverty. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Waite, R., Beveridge, M., Brummett, R., Castine, S., Chaiyawannakarn, N., Kaushik, S., … & Phillips, M. (2014). Improving productivity and environmental performance of aquaculture. Penang: WorldFish.Google Scholar
  30. Willis, T. J., Millar, R. B., & Babcock, R. C. (2003). Protection of exploited fish in temperate regions: High density and biomass of snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) in northern New Zealand marine reserves. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40(2), 214–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yacob, M. R., Radam, A., Shuib, A., Samarahan, K., & Sarawak, M. (2009). A contingent valuation study of marine parks ecotourism: The case of Pulau Payar and Pulau Redang in Malaysia. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(2), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and AdministrationUniversity of MalayaKuala-LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations