Abstract
We assess nine planning indicators in this chapter—planning mandate, capacity of the planning agency, effectiveness of the planning process, transparency in the working of the planning agency, public participation in planning, legislative review–capacity, and public participation, and engagement of consultant/advisory groups by the planning agency. The selected cities are rated quite highly on the planning mandate in statutory requirements, planning capacity and their effectiveness. Most cities are rated quite low on enabling public participation and transparency in the working of the planning agency. Most cities did not require a mandated legislative review. Even where the legislative review is required, they are rated quite low on transparency or public participation in such a process. Nonetheless most cities are rated quite highly on the engagement of consultant/advisory groups and the way in which they are objectively treated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As per the assessment team’s notes, the focus of Delhi planning members was however, primarily on construction of vehicle oriented infrastructure rather than inclusiveness of sustainable modes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seetharam Sridhar, K., Gadgil, R., Dhingra, C. (2020). Planning: Findings from the Pilot Studies. In: Paving the Way for Better Governance in Urban Transport. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9620-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9620-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9619-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9620-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)