Summary of the Assessments

Abstract

Across the 10 cities in 3 states, a total of 29 different agencies were assessed and 381 indicators were evaluated. In this chapter, consolidated results from the assessments against different parameters are presented. Overall analyses of the indicators reveal that agencies tend to score better in the aspect of ‘accountability’, while ‘public participation’ fares the poorest when it comes to urban mobility-related governance. For accountability, cities in Karnataka and Bengal score high in mostly all functions. Participation as an element of good governance fares the worst across all cities and states analysed. Transparency ratings are largely in the medium range across all the states. Karnataka and Delhi score the highest on the capacity-related indicators, with all other states having mostly low to medium scores.