Research, Development and Innovation: Transformation in Taiwanese Higher Education

  • Yu-Ching KuoEmail author
  • Sheng-Ju Chan
Part of the Higher Education in Asia: Quality, Excellence and Governance book series (HEAQEG)


Academia Sinica, Taiwan’s most prestigious research institution, formed a cross-sectoral committee in 2013 to make recommendations directly to the Taiwanese government on higher education (HE) and science and technology (S&T) policy (高等教育與科技政策建議書) reformulation. Academia Sinica’s primary intention was to call for more policy attention to the missing link between three elements: S&T, economic growth and talent cultivation and attraction.


  1. Academia Sinica, Taiwan. (2013). 高等教育與科技政策建議書 (Consultation paper on higher education and science and technology policy). Retrieved from
  2. Aidt, T. S., & Dutta, J. (2007). Policy myopia and economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(3), 734–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentley, P. J., Gulbrandsen, M., & Kyvik, S. (2015). The relationship between basic and applied research in universities. Higher Education, 70(4), 689–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bevir, M. (2006). Governance. In M. Bevir (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of governance (pp. 364–381). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Biermann, F., Abbott, K., Andresen, S., Bäckstrand, K., Bernstein, S., Betsill, M. M., et al. (2012). Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving earth system governance. Science, 335(6074), 1306–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., Van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Board of Science and Technology (BOST), Taiwan. (2016). About BOST: Missions & structure. Retrieved from
  8. Castells, M. (2009, August 7). Lecture on higher education. Paper presented at the Centre for Higher Education Transformation, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, S. J., & Mok, K. H. (2015). The quest for entrepreneurial university in Taiwan: Policies and practices in industry-academy cooperation. In J. Hawkins & K.-H. Mok (Eds.), Research, development and innovation in Asia Pacific higher education (pp. 135–154). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang, C. H. ( Open image in new window ). (2016, June 17). Taiwanese universities are slipping down university rankings—the post-aim for the Top University Project budget has been frozen by the members of Legislative Yuan ( Open image in new window ). Retrieved from
  11. Chang, Y.-S., & Kuo, Y.-C. (2016). The interplay between the development of research funding systems and the creation of a sustainable research talent pipeline. Taipei: The Science & Technology Policy Research and Information Center. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  12. Charbit, C. (2011). Governance of public policies in decentralised contexts: The multi-level approach. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2011/04, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from
  13. Charbit, C., & Michalun, M. (2009). Mind the gaps: Managing mutual dependence in relations among levels of government. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 14, OECD Publishing.
  14. Costantini, V., Crespi, F., & Palma, A. (2015). Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation in energy-efficient technologies. SEEDS Working Paper, 11. Retrieved from
  15. Cunningham, P. (2007). Horizontal analysis of country reviews: R&D investment policies. Synthesis Report for the European Commission. Retrieved from
  16. Cunningham, P., Edler, J., Flanagan, K., & Laredo, P. (2013). Innovation policy mix and instrument interaction: A review. Nesta Working Paper No. 13/20. Retrieved from
  17. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as “quasi-firms”: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relation. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. European Commission. (2011). Commission Staff Working Paper: Impact Assessment-Accompanying the Communication from the Commission “Horizon 2020—The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation”. Retrieved from
  20. European Research Council. (2016). Frontier research. Retrieved from
  21. Executive Yuan, Taiwan. (2016, January 7). Press release: Task force transforming industries and developing business models. Retrieved from
  22. Executive Yuan, Taiwan. (2014, July 8). Press release: New food safety task force to enhance response and communication. Retrieved from
  23. Gulbrandsen, M., & Kyvik, S. (2010). Are the concepts basic research, applied research and experimental development still useful? An empirical investigation among Norwegian academics. Science and Public Policy, 37(5), 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall, B., Link, A., & Scott, J. (2003). Universities as research partners. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 485–491. Retrieved from
  25. Jessop, B. (2006). Governance failure. In M. Bevir (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Governance (pp. 381–382). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher Education and its Communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1989). Power and Interdependence (2nd ed.). Boston and London: Scott, Foresman and Co., Glenview.Google Scholar
  28. Krasner, S. (1982). Structural and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36(2), 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kratochwil, F., & Ruggie, J. G. (2001). International organization: The state of the art or an art of the state. In L. L. Martin & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), International institutions: An international organization reader (pp. 341–364). Boston, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Laredo, A. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities? Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewis, J. (2013). Academic governance: Disciplines and policy. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. May, P. J., & Jochim, A. E. (2013). Policy regime perspectives: Policies, politics, and governing. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 426–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mazzucato, M. (2015, July 27). Re-igniting public and private investments in innovation. Paper presented at the Middle Class Prosperity Forum. Retrieved from
  34. Meadowcroft, J. (1999). Planning for sustainable development: What can we learn from the critics? In M. Kenny & J. Meadowcroft (Eds.), Planning sustainability (pp. 12–38). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Ministry of Education (MOE), Taiwan. (2013). The white paper on talent cultivation. Taipei: Ministry of Education, Taiwan (in Chinese). Retrieved from
  36. Ministry of Education (MOE), Taiwan. (2015). Academic-industrial collaboration task force promotion report. (printed in Chinese). Retrieved from:
  37. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan. (2013). National science and technology development plan (2013–2016). Ministry of Science and Technology. Retrieved from
  38. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan. (2015a). White paper on science and technology (2015–2018). Retrieved from
  39. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan. (2015b). Indicators of science and technology 2015. Taipei: MOST. Retrieved from
  40. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan. (2016). Ministry of Science and Technology. Retrieved from
  41. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan. (2017). National science and technology development plan (2017–2020). Ministry of Science and Technology.
  42. MOST, Taiwan. (2018). Indicators of science and technology Taiwan (2018 Ed.). Taipei: MOST. Retrieved from (last accessed 08 March 2019).
  43. National Development Council (NDC), Taiwan. (2015). Directions for the establishment of the board of population and talent policy. Taiwan: National Development Council. Retrieved from,
  44. National Development Council (NDC), Taiwan. (2016a). 行政院創新創業政策會報設置要點(Directions for the establishment of the Innovation and Startups Task Force). Retrieved from
  45. National Development Council (NDC), Taiwan. (2016b). A description of Asian Silicon Valley development plan. Retrieved from,
  46. National Development Council (NDC), Taiwan._(2016c). Promoting innovation and entrepreneurship; fostering innovation of Taiwanese Industry. Retrieved from
  47. National Science Council (NSC), Taiwan. (2005). National Science and Technology Development Plan (2005–2008). Taiwan: National Science Council. Retrieved from
  48. National Science Council (NSC), Taiwan. (2009). National science and technology development plan (2009–2012). Taiwan: National Science Council. Retrieved from
  49. National Science Council (NSC), Taiwan. (2010). White paper on science and technology (2011–2014). Retrieved from
  50. OECD. (2008). OECD science, technology and industry outlook 2008. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. OECD. (2014). OECD science, technology and industry outlook 2014. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from
  52. OECD. (2014). The space economy at a glance 2014. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from
  53. OECD. (2015a). Economic policy reforms 2015: Going for growth. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from
  54. OECD. (2015b). Frascati manual 2015: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from
  55. OECD.STAT. (2019a). GERD as a percentage of GDP. Retrieved from
  56. OECD.STAT. (2019b). Percentage of GERD financed by government. Retrieved from
  57. OECD.STAT. (2019c). HERD as a percentage of GDP. Retrieved from
  58. OECD.STAT. (2019d). Percentage of GERD performed by the Higher Education sector. Retrieved from
  59. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42, 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stokes, D. E. (2011). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  61. Sun, Y. H. ( Open image in new window ). (2015, April 13). The government’s investment in basic research cannot remain as an empty talk. ( Open image in new window ). Retrieved from
  62. Trencher, G., Yarime, M., McCormick, K. B., Doll, C. N., & Kraines, S. B. (2013). Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Science and Public Policy. Scholar
  63. Williams, G. (2008). Finance and entrepreneurial activity in higher education in a knowledge. In M. Shattock (Ed.), Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy: Diversification and organizational change in European higher education (pp. 9–32). (Maidenhead: McGraw Hill, Society for Research into Higher Education, Open University Press).Google Scholar
  64. Wilson, C. A. (2000). Policy regimes and policy change. Journal of Public Policy, 20(3), 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. World Bank. (2010). Innovation policy: A guide for developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Cheng Kung UniversityTainan CityTaiwan
  2. 2.National Chung Cheng UniversityChiayi CountyTaiwan

Personalised recommendations