Skip to main content

US-China Strategic Competition and East Asian Security

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Report of Strategic Studies in China (2018)
  • 322 Accesses

Abstract

East Asia is presently the most developmentally dynamic region in the international system. However, a distinct paradox has emerged as a result of inconsistencies between the regional political and economic environments. In recent years, regional trends have exhibited increased security conflicts, intensifying competition, and spreading tensions among regional states. The most obvious manifestation of this are the cyclical break-outs of friction between large, medium and small-states inside and outside the region. Along with these substantive developments, the academic community and mass media are also increasingly concerned with discussions centered on the possibility of conflict breaking-out in East Asia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Discussions on US-China conflict has increased significantly among international security scholars. See: Rosecrance and Miller (2014), Liff and Ikenberry (2014), Montgomery (2014), Brooks and Wohlforth (2015/16).

  2. 2.

    For different perspectives of unipolarity issues, see: Ikenberry et al. (2011).

  3. 3.

    Johnston (2013), Boon (2016).

  4. 4.

    For further discussions of power transition theory, see: Organski (1958), Tammen (2000), DiCicco and Levy (1999), Chan (2004).

  5. 5.

    Zhao (2015).

  6. 6.

    CRS Report for Congress, March 28, 2012, “Pivot to the Pacific? The Obama Administration’s ‘Rebalancing’ Toward Asia,” p. 8. http://www.markswatson.com/pivot2pac-CRS.pdf.

  7. 7.

    Allison (2014).

  8. 8.

    Cha (2014).

  9. 9.

    Snyder (1984).

  10. 10.

    For more discussions of the role of alliances in the US’s maintenance of its hierarchical system, see: Lake (2009).

References

  • A. F. K. Organski, World Politics, New York: Knopf, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam P. Liff and G. John Ikenberry, “Racing toward Tragedy? China’s Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma,” International Security, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2014, pp. 52–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaster Iain Johnston, “How New and Assertive is China’s New Assertiveness?” International Security, 2013, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 7–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David A. Lake, Hierarchy in International Relations (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan Braden Montgomery, “Contested Primacy in the Western Pacific: China’s Rise and the Future of U.S. Power Projection,” International Security, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2014, pp. 115–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. John Ikenberry, Michael Mastanduno and William C. Wohlforth, International Relations Theory and the Consequences of Unipolarity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn H. Snyder, “The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics,” World Politics, Vol. 36, No. 4, 1984, pp. 461–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham Allison, “2014: Good Year for a Great War?” The National Interest, January 1, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoo Tiang Boon, “Harding the Hard, Softening the Soft: Assertiveness and China’s Regional Strategy,” The Journal of Strategic Studies, 2016, Vol. 39, No. 8, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonathan M. DiCicco and Jack S. Levy, “Power Shifts and Problem Shifts: The Evolution of the Power Transition Research Program,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1999, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 675–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renald Tammen, ed., Power Transition: Strategies for the 21st Century, New York and London: Chatham House Publishers of Seven Bridges Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard N. Rosecrance and Steven E. Miller, The Next Great War? The Roots of World War I and the Risk of U.S.-China Conflict (MIT Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen G. Brooks and William C. Wohlforth, “The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century: China’s Rise and the Fate of America’s Global Position,” International Security, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2015/16, pp. 7–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steve Chan, “Exploring Puzzles in Power-transition Theory: Implications for Sino-American Relations,” Security Studies, 2004, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 103–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suisheng Zhao, “A New Model of Big Power Relations? China-US Strategic Rivalry and Balance of Power in the Asia-Pacific,” Journal of Contemporary China, 2015, Vol. 24, No. 93, p. 377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victor D. Cha, “American Alliances and Asia’s Regional Architecture,” in Saadia M. Pekkanen, John Ravenhill, and Rosemary Foot, eds., in The Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of Asia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 737–757.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liu, F. (2020). US-China Strategic Competition and East Asian Security. In: Men, H. (eds) Report of Strategic Studies in China (2018). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9286-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics