Advertisement

A Zero Energy Prefabricated ADU for New Zealand

  • Milad MoradibistouniEmail author
  • Brenda Vale
  • Nigel Isaacs
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 155)

Abstract

Human activities threaten the sustainability of energy and environmental resources. One route to alleviate this is that all buildings need to be zero energy in operation. This paper discusses the results of simulating the energy use of a prefabricated accessory dwelling unit (ADU) for different construction scenarios in Wellington, New Zealand. The aim is to see whether it is possible given the construction constraints to achieve zero energy for space conditioning. The simulation was first done using ALF 3.2 software, developed specifically for New Zealand conditions. Changes in each scenario relate to using different thicknesses of Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs) for walls and roof and considering different types of floor, together with different heating regimes. Using ALF 3.2 a total of 36 different scenarios were simulated to see how much energy the ADU needs during a year and where the main sources of energy loss and gain occur. The next stage was running the simulations while adding different degrees of thermal mass to selected designs to see the effect of mass on the ADU energy consumption. The last stage was amending the size of windows in the best performing designs in order to find the best balance between gains and losses through them. Simulation results showed that heating the whole ADU to 16 °C all day and using 165 and 215 mm SIPs panels for walls and roof, respectively, with the ADU sitting on a 150 mm insulated concrete slab delivers the best result, being very close to zero energy for space conditioning.

Keywords

Off-site manufacturing ADU Housing industry Zero energy Energy simulation 

References

  1. 1.
    Global Footprint Network, http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/what_we_do. Last Accessed 2018/11/21
  2. 2.
    ExxonMobil: Summary annual report, ExxonMobil, United States of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    International Energy Agency (2018): Key World Energy Statistics 2018. International Energy Agency (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hong Kong Observatory.: Hong Kong in a Warming World. Hong Kong Observatory (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Whitehouse, D.: The Global Warming Standstill. The Global Warming Policy Foundation, London (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ministry of Business Innovation & Employment: Energy in New Zealand 18. Energy in New Zealand. Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, New, Zealand (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Business New Zealand Energy Council: New Zealand Energy Scenarios, Navigating energy futures to 2050. Business NZ Energy Council, New Zealand (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moradibistouni, M., Vale, B., Isaacs, N.: The potential role of prefabrication in the New Zealand housing crisis: a study of manufacturers of prefabrication in New Zealand. In: Engaging Architectural Science: Meeting the Challenges of Higher Density: 52nd International Conference of the Architectural Science Association. P. Rajagopalan Melbourne RMIT University, Australia (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gorgolewski, M.T.: The potential for prefabrication in United Kingdom Housing to Improve Sustainability. Smart and Sustainable Built Environments. Smart & Sustainable Built Environments. J. Yang, Blackwell, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Britto, J., Dejonghe, N., Dubuisson, M., Schmandt, K.: Business plan for green modular housing. Sch. Environ. Sci. Manage. Master’s Environ. Sci. Manage. (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bell, P.: Prefab + Green: Past, Present and Future. Wellington, Prefab NZ. New Zealand (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Phillipson, M.: New and Improved Technologies and Techniques Defining the Sustainability of Prefabrication and Modular Process in Construction. Building Research Establishment, Scotland (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saville-Smith, K., Saville-Smith, N., Fraser, R.: ADU Potential: Have we the Potential to Use Our Existing Housing Stock of Homes to Create a Bigger Stock of Affordable, Fit for Purpose Homes? Building Better Homes. Center for Research, Evaluation and Social Assessment (CRESA), New Zealand (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    BRANZ.: Introducing ALF (2018). https://alf.branz.co.nz/. Last Accessed 2019/02/21
  16. 16.
    Ministry of Business Innovation & Employment, H1 Energy efficiency. https://www.building.govt.nz/building-code-compliance/h-energy-efficiency/h1-energy-efficiency/#top. Retrieved Last Accessed 2018/22
  17. 17.
    New Zealand Transport Agency.: Overdimension vehicles and loads, Factsheet 53a. New Zealand Transport Agency, New Zealand (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johra, H., Heiselberg, P., Dréau, J.: Influence of envelope, structural thermal mass and indoor content on the building heating energy flexibility. Energy Build. 183, 325–339 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reilly, A., Kinnane, O.: The impact of thermal mass on building energy consumption. Appl. Energy 198, 108–121 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vale, B., Vale, R.: The New Autonomous House: Design and Planning for Sustainability. Thames & Hudson London (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    New Zealand SIP.: Compare Conventional Timber Frame Build to Smart Panels (2018). http://www.nzsip.co.nz/. Last Access 20/12/2018
  22. 22.
    Binamu, A.H., Lindberg, R.: Roomvent. Air Distribution in Room: Ventilation for Health and Sustainable Environment. Elsevier Science, Reading (2000)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Younes, C., Shdid, C., Bitsuamlak, G.: Air infiltration through building envelopes: a review. J. Buil. Phys. 35(3), 267–302 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hansen, R.T.N.: High efficiency heat recovery from ventilation air. Energy and Process Engineering, University of Science and Technology. Master thesis. Norway (2017)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kamendere, E., Zandeckis, A., Kamenders, A., Rochas, C., Ikaunieks, J.: Mechanical ventilation with a heat recovery system in renovated apartment buildings. Agron. Res. 12(2), 491–498 (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roulet, C.-A., Heidt, F.D., Foradini, F., Pibiri, M.-C.: Real heat recovery with air handling units. Energy Build. 33(5), 495–502 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    The Renewable Energy Hub: How to Calculate Solar Panel Size Needed. https://www.renewableenergyhub.co.uk/solar-panels/how-to-calculate-solar-panel-size-needed.html. Last Accessed 2018/12/12

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milad Moradibistouni
    • 1
    Email author
  • Brenda Vale
    • 1
  • Nigel Isaacs
    • 1
  1. 1.Victoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations