Skip to main content

On Promoting Policy-Science Dialogue for Adaptation Planning in Agricultural Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adaptation to Climate Change in Agriculture

Abstract

Climate change poses considerable risks to agriculture and food security especially in developing countries. Taking urgent adaptation action is required, and the global agendas to support the countries are in place. An important element for adaptation planning is to build robust evidence about past and future climate risks and vulnerabilities and to identify and appraise options of adaptation practices.

However, many impact assessments in agriculture focus either on small-scale area, such as farm level, or global scale, and there is lack of information at national and sub-national level to address the climate risks for making adaptation policies. In many developing countries, the capacity to conduct assessments is also weak. In an attempt to fill these knowledge and capacity gaps, FAO has developed an integrated assessment tool MOSAICC and implemented in eight countries. It packages multiple models from different disciplines into one system to promote collaboration of an interdisciplinary group of subject experts and policy makers. Thus, we tried to promote a dialogue between science and policy. There are high expectations for science community to translate scientific research into practical risk and vulnerability assessment for decision-making at national and sub-national levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aerts JCJH, Kriek M, Schepel M (1999) STREAM, spatial tools for river basins and environment and analysis of management options: set up and requirements. Phys Chem Earth Part B Hydrol Oceans Atmos 24:591–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bénichou P, Le Breton OA (1987) AURELHY: Une méthode d’analyse utilisant le relief pour les besoins de l’hydrométéorologie. Journées Hydrologiques de l’ORSTOM à Montpellier 2:299–304

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (2018) The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2018. Building climate resilience for food security and nutrition. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Franquin P (1973) Analyse agroclimatique en régions tropicales. Méthode des intersections et période fréquentielle de végétation. Agronomie tropicale 28:665–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Frère M, Popov GF (1986) Early Agrometeorological crop yield forecasting. FAO Plant Production and Protection, FAO, Paper no 73, p 150. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Malawi (2016) Malawi drought 2015–2016 post-disaster needs assessment (PDNA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez JM, San-Martín D, Cofiño AS, Herrera S, Manzanas R, Frías MD (2012) User guide of the ENSEMBLES downscaling portal. Version 3. Technical note 2/2012, Santander Meteorology Group, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds), pp 485–533. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones PG, Thornton PK (2009) Croppers to livestock keepers: livelihood transitions to 2050 in Africa due to climate change. Environ Sci Policy 12:427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Travis WR, Wilbanks TJ (2012) Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptation to climate change are insufficient. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:7156–7161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lofgren H, Thomas M, El-Said M (2002) A standard Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model in GAMS, a standard Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model in GAMS, International Food Policy Research Institute 5, International Food Policy Research Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippke U, Ramirez-Villegas J, Jarvis A, Vermeulen S, Parker L, Mer F, Diekkruger B, Challinor AJ, Howden M (2016) Timescales of transformational climate change adaptation in sub-Saharan African agriculture. Nat Climate Change 6. https://doi.org/10.10387/NCLIMATE2947

  • Scheller RM, Mladenoff DJ (2004) A forest growth and biomass module for a landscape simulation model, LANDIS: design, validation, and application. Ecol Model 180:211–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P et al (2009) AquaCrop – the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: I. Concepts and underlying principles. Agron J 101(3):426–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Dessai S (2010) Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 65(7):180–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wreford A, Ignaciuk A, Gruère G (2017) Overcoming barriers to the adoption of climate-friendly practices in agriculture. OECD food, agriculture and fisheries papers, no. 101. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/97767de8-en

Download references

Acknowledgments

The development of MOSAICC was supported initially by an EU/FAO Program. FAO projects, funded by Japan, Belgium, Netherlands, and Germany, provided financial support for MOSAICC implementation in countries. We would like to express our gratitude to all the technical partner institutions and individuals who developed the models that constitute MOSAICC: University of Mons (Belgium), Institute for Environmental Studies, Free University of Amsterdam, Water Insight (the Netherlands), and University of Cantabria (Spain). The authors also would like to acknowledge the work of their colleagues in national ministries, research institutes, and universities who carried out climate change impact studies in each country and FAO country offices and project staff who supported their work. We thank FAO colleagues in Rome who contributed to the development and implementation of MOSAICC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fujisawa, M., Kanamaru, H. (2019). On Promoting Policy-Science Dialogue for Adaptation Planning in Agricultural Sector. In: Iizumi, T., Hirata, R., Matsuda, R. (eds) Adaptation to Climate Change in Agriculture. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9235-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics