Image Processing Based Vegetation Cover Monitoring and Its Categorization Using Differential Satellite Imageries for Urmodi River Watershed in Satara District, Maharashtra, India

  • Wasim A. Bagwan
  • Ravindra S. GavaliEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1037)


Rapid monitoring of vegetation cover with precision has always been a challenge for maintaining accuracy over a large area. Remote Sensing (RS) based satellite imagery has significantly contributed in monitoring vegetation and land cover categorization. As the vegetation has a close relationship with detachment of soil and its sedimentation, regular monitoring of vegetation is essential especially in the catchment area of dams and reservoirs. In this study, vegetation maps were prepared through imaging processing of satellite imageries. With the help of Vegetation Index (VI) based maps, we were able to study the vegetation phenology in the watershed. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) and Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) were obtained using the spectral bands of Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2 A satellite data. The classes were made in accordance to no vegetation cover (<0.1), low vegetation cover (0.1–0.3), moderate vegetation cover (0.3–0.4), high vegetation cover (>0.4). The area under each category was calculated with vector files. Further, the relationship between pixel values of Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2 was analyzed by downscaling the spatial resolution of Landsat 8 maps. The pixel value of two satellite based NDVI and SAVI shows same R\(^2\) value, that is 85.12 and EVI 83.15 respectively. Basically, the low vegetation cover depicted by the two imageries shows enormous difference which is quite huge for assessing the land/soil degradation. It was also revealed from the study that, Sentinel 2 imagery was very useful in computing EVI where the high density vegetation cover is present as compared to Landsat 8.


Land degradation Vegetation Index (VI) NDVI SAVI EVI 



We are very thankful to the European Space Agency (ESA) for provide Sentinel- 2 data through portal- Earth Explorer and also for providing Landsat 8 imagery. The first author is thankful to the School of Earth Sciences, Solapur University, Solapur for their financial support in the form of Departmental Research Fellowship (DRF).


  1. 1.
    Durigon, V.L., Carvalho, D.F., Antunes, M.A.H., Oliveira, P.T.S., Fernandes, M.M.: International journal of remote NDVI time series for monitoring RUSLE cover management factor in a tropical watershed. Int. J. Remote Sens. 35, 441–453 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mróz, M., Sobieraj, A.: Comparison of several vegetation indices calculated on the basis of a seasonal SPOT XS time series, and their suitability for land cover and agricultural crop identification. Tech. Sci. 7, 39–66 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sharma, A.: Integrating terrain and vegetation indices for identifying potential soil erosion risk area. Geo-Spatial Inf. Sci. 13, 201–209 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lamchin, M., Park, T., Lee, J.Y., Lee, W.K.: Monitoring of vegetation dynamics in the mongolia using MODIS NDVIs and their relationship to rainfall by natural zone. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 43, 325–337 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patel, N.K., Saxena, R.K., Shiwalkar, A.: Study of fractional vegetation cover using high spectral resolution data. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 35, 73–79 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Verma, R., Dutta, S.: Vegetation dynamics from denoised NDVI using empirical mode decomposition. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 41, 555–566 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rouse, J.W., Haas, R.H., Schell, J.A.: Monitoring the vernal advancement and retrogradation (greenwave effect) of natural vegetation (1974)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McFarland, T.M., van Riper, C.I.: Use of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) habitat models to predict breeding birds on the San Pedro River, Arizona, p. 42 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shifaw, E., Sha, J., Li, X., Bao, Z., Ji, J., Chen, B.: Spatiotemporal analysis of vegetation cover (1984–2017) and modelling of its change drivers, the case of Pingtan Island. China. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 0, 0 (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mokarram, M., Hojjati, M., Roshan, G., Negahban, S.: Modeling the behavior of vegetation indices in the salt dome of Korsia in North-East of Darab, Fars. Iran. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 1, 9 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jaishanker, R., Senthivel, T., Sridhar, V.N.: Comparison of vegetation indices for practicable homology. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 33, 395–404 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maimouni, S., EL-Harti, A., Bannari, A., Bachaoui, E.-M.: Water erosion risk mapping using derived parameters from digital elevation model and remotely sensed data. Geo-spatial Inf. Sci. 15, 157–169 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang, Z., Ge, Y.U.: Spatio-temporal distribution of vegetation index and its influencing factors-a case study of the Jiaozhou Bay, China*. Chinese J. Oceanol, Limnol. 35(6), 1398–1408 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meneses-Tovar, C.L.: NDVI as indicator of degradation. Unasylva. 62, 39–46 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alphan, H., Derse, M.A.: Change detection in Southern Turkey using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag. 21, 12–18 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kachouri, S., Achour, H., Abida, H., Bouaziz, S.: Soil erosion hazard mapping using analytic hierarchy process and logistic regression: a case study of Haffouz watershed, central Tunisia. Arab. J. Geosci. 8, 4257–4268 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huete, A.R.: A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sens. Environ. 25, 295–309 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, H., Rodriguez, E.P., Gao, X., Ferreira, L.F.: Overview of the radiometric and biopyhsical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 83, 195–213 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Arnoldus, H.M.J., Riquier, J.: World assessment of soil degradation - Phase I. In: FAO Soils Bulletin Assessing Soil Degradation. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome (1977)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roose, E.: Land use and soil degradation. In: FAO Soils Bulletin Assessing Soil Degradation. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome (1977)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science, School of Earth SciencesSolapur UniversitySolapurIndia
  2. 2.National Institute of Rural Development and Panchayati RajHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations