The Ocean-Climate Nexus in the Unfolding Anthropocene: Addressing Environmental Challenges Through International Law and Cooperation

  • Stephen MinasEmail author


Climate change and dramatic change to ocean ecosystems are two of the leading indicators of the proposed ‘Anthropocene’ epoch. As knowledge of feedbacks between climate change and damage to ocean ecosystems has improved, the case for addressing these interrelated challenges concurrently has strengthened. This chapter begins by reviewing the relationship between climate change and the state of the ocean as explained in recent scientific publications. It proceeds from this to summarise how this ocean-climate nexus is addressed in current and developing international law, before focusing on three particular examples: first, regulation of international shipping emissions; second, management of coastal ecosystems (‘blue carbon’); and third, the current negotiation on a new treaty to protect the high seas. These three examples illustrate the diversity of regulation undertaken within a four-square matrix of processes under the Climate Convention, or under the Law of the Sea Convention, which are based on either mandatory commitments or non-binding facilitative measures. The chapter concludes that there are further opportunities to address ocean-climate feedbacks in a targeted and timely manner, including through additional linkages between UNFCCC- and UNCLOS-based processes.




  1. Bodansky D (2015) Climate change: transnational legal order or disorder? In: Halliday TC, Shaffer G (eds) Transnational legal orders. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 287Google Scholar
  2. Brown PJ et al (2016) Impacts and effects of ocean warming on carbon management including methane hydrates. In: Laffoley D, Baxter JM (eds) Explaining ocean warming: causes, scale, effects and consequences. Full report. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, pp 380–84Google Scholar
  3. Caron DD (1990) When law makes climate change worse: rethinking the law of baselines in light of a rising sea level. Ecol Law Q 17:621–53Google Scholar
  4. Caron DD, Scheiber H (eds) (2004) Bringing new law to ocean waters. BrillGoogle Scholar
  5. Cullinan C (2013) The rule of nature’s law. In: Voigt C (ed) Rule of law for nature: new dimensions and ideas in environmental law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 94–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frölicher TL, Fischer EM, Gruber N (2018) Marine heatwaves under global warming. Nature 560:360–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Herr D, Landis E (2016) Coastal blue carbon ecosystems. In: Opportunities for nationally determined contributions. Policy brief. IUCN, TNC, Gland, Switzerland, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Herr D, von Unger M, Laffoley D, McGivern A (2017) Pathways for implementation of blue carbon Initiatives. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 27:116–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. IPCC (2014a) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. In: Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds) Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  10. IPCC (2014b) 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: wetlands. In: Hiraishi T, Krug T, Tanabe K, Srivastava N, Baasansuren J, Fukuda M, Troxler TG (eds). IPCC, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  11. Letter dated 7 July 2015 from the Co-chairs of the ad hoc working group of the whole on the regular process for global reporting and assessment of the state of the marine environment, including socioeconomic aspects addressed to the president of the general assembly, summary of the first global integrated marine assessment, A/70/112, 22 July 2015Google Scholar
  12. Minas S (2018) Marine technology transfer under a BBNJ treaty: a case for transnational network cooperation. AJIL Unbound 112:144–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nellemann C, Corcoran E, Duarte CM, Valdés L, De Young C, Fonseca L, Grimsditch G (eds) (2009) Blue carbon. A rapid response assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal.
  14. Rayfuse R (2012) Climate Change and the Law of the Sea. In: Rayfuse R, Scott SV (eds) International law in the Era of climate change. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Scotford E, Stephen M (2018) Probing the hidden depths of climate law: analysing national climate change legislation. In: Review of European, comparative & international environmental law (2018) Online FirstGoogle Scholar
  16. Steffen W, Crutzen PJ, McNeill JR (2007) The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio 36:614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223):1259855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Telesetsky A (2018) Weathering the 21st century: how UNCLOS contributes to responses to climate-related disaster events. In: Stephen M, Diamond HJ (eds) Stress testing the law of the sea: dispute resolution, disasters & emerging challenges, BrillGoogle Scholar
  19. Third IMO GHG Study 2014 (2015) Executive summary and final report. International Maritime OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  20. Waters CN, Zalasiewicz J, Summerhayes C, Barnosky AD, Poirier C (2016) The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the holocene. Science 351:aad2622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zumbansen P (2014) Law & society and the politics of relevance: facts and field boundaries in ‘Transnational Legal Theory in Context’. NoFo 11:1–37Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawPeking UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations