Skip to main content

Systemic Risks: Common Characteristics and Approaches for Improving Resilience

  • 290 Accesses

Part of the Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific book series (ELIAP)

Abstract

In this article, I aim to delineate the genesis and analytical scope of risk governance. Risk governance pertains to the various ways in which many actors, individuals and institutions, public and private, deal with risks surrounded by uncertainty, complexity and/or ambiguity. The ambition is that risk governance provides a conceptual as well as normative basis for how to deal responsibly with complex risks. I propose to synthesize the body of scholarly ideas and proposals on the governance of risks in a set of management regimes: the combination of risk-based, precautionary and discourse-based management regimes. This set of regimes should be read as a synthesis of what needs to be seriously considered in organizing structures and processes to govern risks and to include stakeholders in the assessment and evaluation of risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-9005-0_6
  • Chapter length: 18 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-981-13-9005-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1

Source WBGU (2000)

Fig. 2

Source adapted from Renn (2008, p. 280)

References

  • Birkmann J (2011) First-and second-order adaptation to natural hazards and extreme events in the context of climate change. Nat Hazards 58(2):811–840

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bloesch J, von Hauff M, Mainzer K, Mohan V, Renn O, Risse V, Song Y, Takeuchi K, Wilderer P (2015) Sustainable development integrated in the concept of resilience. Probl Sustain Dev 10(1):7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown D, Kulig J (1996) The concept of resiliency: theoretical lessons from community research. Health Can Soc 4:29–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch C (2004) Post democracy. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagendijk R, Irwin A (2006) Public deliberation and governance: engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe. Minerva 44(2):167–184

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Helbing D (2010) Systemic risks in society and economics. International Risk Governance Council. https://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/Systemic_Risks_Helbing2.pdf

  • Helbing D (2012) New ways to promote sustainability and social well-being in a complex, strongly interdependent world: the FuturICT approach. Why society is a complex matter. Springer, Berlin, pp 55–60

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4(1):1–23

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson KL (2006) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: public policy and public attitudes. Fertil Steril 85(6):1638–1645

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • IRGC (International Risk Governance Council) (2005) Risk governance: towards an integrative approach. White paper no. 1, ITGC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Pidgeon N, Slovic P (2003) The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In: Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P (eds) The social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–46

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman GG, Scott KE (2003) What is systemic risk, and do bank regulators retard or contribute to it? Indep Rev 7(3):371–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes R (2004) The post-truth era. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinke A, Renn O (1999) Prometheus unbound. Challenges of risk evaluation, risk classification, and risk management. Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Baden-Württemberg. Working paper no. 153

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinke A, Renn O (2002) A new approach to risk evaluation and management: risk-based, precaution-based, and discourse-based strategies. Risk Anal Int J 22(6):1071–1094

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Klinke A, Renn O (2012) Adaptive and integrative governance on risk and uncertainty. J Risk Res 15(3):273–292

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Klinke A, Renn O (2014) Expertise and experience: a deliberative system of a functional division of labor for post-normal risk governance. Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res 27(4):442–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Löftstedt R, van Asselt M (2008) A framework for risk governance revisited. In: Renn O, Walker K (eds) Global risk governance. Concept and practice using the IRGC framework. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff PH, Armstrong NJ, Perrin K, Parker WM, Hidek MA (2010) Building resilient communities: a preliminary framework for assessment. Homel Secur Aff VI(3):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz DF (2013) The diversity of resilience: contributions from a social science perspective. Nat Hazards 67(1):7–24

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche KF, Pfefferbaum RL (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Commun Psychol 41(1–2):127–150

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nursimulu A (2015) Governance of slow-developing catastrophic risks: fostering complex adaptive system and resilience thinking. SSRN. https://d6.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2830581

  • OECD (2003) Emerging risks in the 21st century. An agenda for action. OECD, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/futures/globalprospects/37944611.pdf

  • Renn O (2008) Risk governance. Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn O (2011) The social amplification/attenuation of risk framework: application to climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 2(2):154–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn O (2014) Das Risikoparadox. Warum, wir uns vor dem Falschen fürchten. Fisher, Frankfurt/Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn O (2015) Are we afraid of the wrong things? Statistics, psychology and the risk paradox. In: Union Investment (ed) The measurement of risk. Union Investment International, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 24–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn O (2016) Systemic risks: the new kid on the block. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 58(2):26–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn O, Klinke A (2016) Complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in inclusive risk governance. In: Andersen TJ (ed) The Routledge companion to strategic risk management. Routledge, New York, pp 13–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn O, Schweizer PJ (2009) Inclusive risk governance: concepts and application to environmental policy making. Environ Policy Gov 19(3):174–185

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Renn O, Lucas K, Haas A, Jaeger C (2017) Things are different today: the challenge of global systemic risks. J Risk Res 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa E, McCright A, Renn O (2013) The risk society revisited: social theory and risk governance. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose A (2007) Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions. Environ Hazards 7(4):383–398

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci Technol Human Values 25(1):3–29

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt M (2000) Perspectives on uncertainty and risk. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht and Boston

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wachinger G, Renn O, Wist SK, Steinhilber SM, Triemer U (2014) Using participation to create resilience: how to involve citizens in designing a hospital system? Environ Syst Decis 34(2):208–223

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • WBGU, German Advisory Council on Global Change (2000) World in transition. Strategies for managing global environmental risks. Annual report 1998. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann PM, Mertens J, Schütz H (2000) Risikoabschätzung und Erarbeitung von Optionen für mögliche Vorsorgekonzepte für nichtionisierende Strahlung. Arbeiten zur Risiko-Kommunikation, Heft 81. Forschungszentrum KFA, Jülich

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B, Dressel K (2001) Cultures of uncertainty—transboundary risks and BSE in Europe. In: Linnerooth-Bayer J, Löfstedt RE, Sjöstedt G (eds) Transboundary risk management. Earthscan, London, pp 121–154

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ortwin Renn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Renn, O. (2019). Systemic Risks: Common Characteristics and Approaches for Improving Resilience. In: Kamesaka, A., Waldenberger, F. (eds) Governance, Risk and Financial Impact of Mega Disasters. Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9005-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9005-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9004-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9005-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)