Skip to main content

Japan’s Disaster Risk Financing: Framework and Policies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governance, Risk and Financial Impact of Mega Disasters

Part of the book series: Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific ((ELIAP))

  • 339 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout its history, Japan has faced various types of natural disasters, including the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011. Against this backdrop, the country has developed a wide range of country-specific disaster risk financing (DRF) tools, and encouraged developing countries to follow suit. This chapter is the first attempt to capture the key characteristics of Japan’s own DRF tools and the cross-border DRF policies for development purposes. Specifically, Japan’s earthquake insurance, established in 1966, provides a means of burden-sharing between the public and private sectors through a three-tiered system. The government also tailors its budgetary schemes to various recovery and reconstruction needs, in accordance with the magnitude and characteristics of the disasters. Lastly, the chapter discusses sovereign risk pools and bilateral development loans, both as disaster countermeasures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Notes

  1. 1.

    National Police Agency, December 8, 2017.

  2. 2.

    Although global and regional surveys exist (OECD 2013, 2015), they lack in-depth investigations of country-specific circumstances.

  3. 3.

    The national plan elaborates on the characteristics of these three policy responses for 15 different types of disasters, including both natural and man-made disasters, as well as features that are common to all disasters.

  4. 4.

    See Articles 1 and 35 of the Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act.

  5. 5.

    The Director-General for Disaster Management in the Cabinet Office, a central government hub for DRM, secures a certain amount of its own budget for DRM (6.2 billion yen for FY2018). However, this budget item does not encompass all the spending on the DRF tools. DRF expenditure on items such as financing sources for resilient infrastructure and contingency reserves are outside this budget.

  6. 6.

    As it must be accumulated well before a disaster, the reserve can be categorized as an ex ante measure. See OECD (2012).

  7. 7.

    For instance, from FY2013–FY2017, on average, the amount of disaster recovery expenditure in the initial budget was 73,261 million yen, whereas that in the supplementary budget was 214,052 million yen.

  8. 8.

    See http://www.soumu.go.jp/iken/h28_118776.html (in Japanese only).

  9. 9.

    Nikkei Shimbun, February 8, 2016.

  10. 10.

    For instance, the government earthquake investigation committee estimates that the likelihood of a potential massive Nankai Trough earthquake in the next 30 years ranges from 70 to 80% (Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion 2018).

  11. 11.

    Over time, earthquake insurance has expanded its coverage, such that the current earthquake insurance can be viewed as akin to property insurance (Earthquake Insurance Project Team 2012).

  12. 12.

    The shares of the government, JER, and the private sector are 78%, 20%, and 2%, respectively.

  13. 13.

    Currently, the insurance rate is from 0.068 to 0.363%, depending on the risk of the area and whether buildings are fireproof. There is a discount if the residence is deemed resilient to earthquakes. Long-term policies also receive a preferable treatment in relation to the premium.

  14. 14.

    If the damage exceeds this limit, extra fiscal support may be considered on a case-by-case basis.

  15. 15.

    For instance, the penetration rate of Hyogo prefecture, which was the most severely affected by the Great Hanshin–Awaji Earthquake, was 4.8% in FY1994, compared to the then-national average of 9.0%.

  16. 16.

    As of November 2017, the program had provided technical assistance worth US$ 58 million and facilitated US$ 2 billion worth of World Bank loans.

  17. 17.

    Under this program, “disaster” is defined as including both natural and man-made disasters, but not conflicts.

  18. 18.

    At the Elmau Summit in 2015, under the German Presidency, the G7 countries set a goal to increase the number of people who have access to direct or indirect insurance coverage against climate hazards in vulnerable developing countries from 100 to 400 million by 2020. By combining “insurance” and “resilience”, the initiative was named “InsuResilience”.

  19. 19.

    PCRAFI covers 80% of all losses below a 1-in-20-year event, while transferring the rest of the exposure to reinsurers, 20% of all losses below a 1-in-20-year event and 100% of all losses above a 1-in-20-year event (2016–17 Business Plan).

  20. 20.

    16 CCRIF countries (2017/18 policy year), 5 PCRAFI countries (2017/18 policy year), and 6 ARC countries (2016/17 rainfall season).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Takahiro Tsuda is grateful to Hideaki Hamada and Rie Yamaguchi for their invaluable comments. Yusuke Hayashida, Sokichi Morioka, and Shun Sakata provided much-appreciated research assistance. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Japanese government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Tsuda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tsuda, T. (2019). Japan’s Disaster Risk Financing: Framework and Policies. In: Kamesaka, A., Waldenberger, F. (eds) Governance, Risk and Financial Impact of Mega Disasters. Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9005-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9005-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9004-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9005-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics