Skip to main content

Random Forest-Based Sarcastic Tweet Classification Using Multiple Feature Collection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multimedia Big Data Computing for IoT Applications

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library ((ISRL,volume 163))

Abstract

Sarcasm is primary reason behind the faulty classification of the tweets. The tweets of sarcastic nature appear in the different compositions, but mainly deflect the meaning different than their actual composition. This confuses the classification models and produces false results. In the paper, the primary focus remains upon the classification of sarcastic tweets, which has been accomplished using the textual structure. This involves the expressions of speech, part of speech features, punctuations, term sentiment, affection, etc. All of the features are extracted individually from the target tweet and combined altogether to create the cumulative feature for the target tweet. The proposed model has been observed with accuracy slightly higher than 84%, which depicts the clear improvement in comparison with existing models. The random forest-based classification model has outperformed all other candidates deployed under the experiment. The random forest classifier is observed with accuracy of 84.7, which outperforms the SVM (78.6%), KNN (73.1%), and Maximum entropy (80.5%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. http://language.worldofcomputing.net/category/machine-translation

  2. S. Tanwar et al., Multimedia big data computing and internet of things applications: a taxonomy and process model. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Riloff, A. Qadir, P. Surve, L. De Silva, N. Gilbert, R. Huang, Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation, in Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (2013), pp. 704–714

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.A. Walker, J.E.F. Tree, P. Anand, R. Abbott, J. King, A corpus for research on deliberation and debate, in LREC (2012), pp. 812–817

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Fersini, F.A. Pozzi, E. Messina, Detecting irony and sarcasm in microblogs: the role of expressive signals and ensemble classifiers, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics, IEEE (2015), pp. 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Bouazizi, T. Ohtsuki, A pattern-based approach for sarcasm detection on Twitter. IEEE 4, 5477–5488 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Poria, E. Cambria, D. Hazarika, P. Vij, A deeper look into sarcastic tweets using deep convolutional neural networks (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Joshi, S. Agrawal, P. Bhattacharyya, M. Carman, Expect the unexpected: harnessing sentence completion for sarcasm detection, in Proceedings of the International Conference of the Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics (Springer, Singapore, 2017), pp. 275–287

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.K. Bharti, R. Pradhan, K.S. Babu, S.K. Jena, Sarcastic sentiment detection based on types of sarcasm occurring in twitter data. Int. J. Sem. Web Inf. Syst. (IJSWIS) 13, 89–108 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S.K. Bharti, K.S. Babu, S.K. Jena, Parsing-based sarcasm sentiment recognition in twitter data, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, IEEE/ACM (2015), pp. 1373–1380

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Kaur et al., Text analytical models for data collected from micro-blogging Portal–a review. J. Emerg. Technol. Innov. Res. (JETIR) 5, 81–86 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Khodak, N. Saunshi, K. Vodrahali, A large self-annotated corpus for Sarcasm (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Saha, J. Yadav, P. Ranjan, Proposed approach for sarcasm detection in Twitter. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 10 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Deshmukh, S. Solanke, Review paper: sarcasm detection and observing user behavioral. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 166 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. Haripriya, P.G. Patil, A survey of sarcasm detection in social media. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. (IJRASET) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Joshi, P. Bhattacharya, M.J. Carman, Automatic sarcasm detection: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 50 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A.D. Dave, N.P. Desai, A comprehensive study of classification techniques for sarcasm detection on textual data, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT) (2016), pp. 1985–1991

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. Medhat, A. Hassan, H. Korashy, Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: a survey. Eng. J. 5, 1093–1113 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tomas Ptacek, Ivan Habernal and Jun Hong, “Sarcasm detection on Czech and English twitter”, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, COLING, pp. 213–223, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Khurana, A. Koli, K. Khatter, S. Singh, Natural language processing: state of the art, current trends and challenges (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. E. Lunando, A. Purwarianti, Indonesian social media sentiment analysis with sarcasm detection, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), IEEE ( 2013), pp. 195–198

    Google Scholar 

  22. https://www.google.com/search?q=starting+window+of+spyder&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=dlJnEECXUMNvM%253A%252Cf1HkEIjoqWS7zM%252C_&usg=__3JDt9STOUxjMyHHYZ2UmfpL697k%3D&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiUoo2zz_LaAhVKr48KHcmQDIkQ9QEIajAG#imgrc=dlJnEEC-XUMNvM

  23. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spyder_(software)

  24. https://wiki.python.org/moin/BeginnersGuide/Overview

  25. D. Dmitry, O. Tsur, A. Rappoport, Enchanced sentiment learning using Twitter hashtags and smileys, in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: posters (2010), pp. 241–249

    Google Scholar 

  26. B. Ohana, B. Tierney, Sentiment classification of reviews using SentiWordNet (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. S.B. Kotsiantis, I. Zaharakis, P. Pintelas, Supervised machine learning: a review of classification techniques, in Emerging Artificial Intelligence Applications in Computer Engineering (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Pak, P. Paroubek, Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. LREC 10, 1320–1326 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jasandeep Kaur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kumar, R., Kaur, J. (2020). Random Forest-Based Sarcastic Tweet Classification Using Multiple Feature Collection. In: Tanwar, S., Tyagi, S., Kumar, N. (eds) Multimedia Big Data Computing for IoT Applications. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 163. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8759-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics