Skip to main content

“Classroom-Ready Teachers”

Gaps, Silences and Contradictions in the Australian Report into Teacher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Attracting and Keeping the Best Teachers

Abstract

Internationally, there has been considerable political activity around the question of how to better prepare quality teachers and make training institutions more accountable. In Australia, the 2014 report Action now: classroom ready teachers illustrates many of the underlying assumptions, perceived problems and potential solutions driving this agenda. This report, similar to reports in other countries, reinforces the public perception that the “quality” of teachers is deteriorating and the only solution is to intensify accountability regimes through increased levels of control. To this end, the Australian federal government committed $16.9 million to the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership to ensure that “teachers are better trained”. This involves a greater focus on accountability, accreditation, regulation, selection, assessment, content and evidence about “what works”. This chapter critically reflects on the Australian Action now: classroom ready teachers report as a case study of policy rhetoric and policy reality. Drawing on the tradition of critical policy analysis, the chapter sets out to examine (i) the broader social context in which this reform initiative is located, (ii) the key normative values and assumptions underpinning the report, (iii) gaps, silences and contradictions in policy discourses, and (iv) alternative conceptions of teacher education grounded in a more relational and intellectually engaged response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angus, L. (1993). The sociology of school effectiveness. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14(3), 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. Carlton: MCEECDYA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, W. (2004). Teaching towards freedom: Moral commitment and ethical action in the classroom. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (1989). Inside/out: The school in political context. In B. Cosin, M. Flude, & M. Hales (Eds.), School, work and society (pp. 135–153). Sydney: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen Ball. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolome, L. (1994). Beyond the methods fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64(2), 173–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D., & Biddle, B. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1998). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century (25th anniversary ed.). New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosio, R. (1994). A radical democratic critique of capitalist education. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, R., & Gitlin, A. (1991). Educative communities and the development of the reflective practitioner. In B. Tabachnick & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Issues and practices in inquiry-orientated teacher education (pp. 35–55). New York: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, A. (2015). Carter review of initial teacher training (ITT). London: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S., & McLaughlin, E. (2000). New managerialism, new welfare? London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., Stern, R., Sanchez, G., Miller, A., Keefe, E., Fernandez, M., Chang, W., Carney, M., Burton, S., & Baker, M. (2016). Holding teacher preparation accountable: A review of claims and evidence. Boulder: National Education Policy Center, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codd, J. (1988). The construction and deconstruction of educational policy documents. Journal of Education Policy, 3(3), 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1989). The labour process and division of labour. In B. Cosin, M. Flude, & M. Hales (Eds.), School, work and society (pp. 123–134). Sydney: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1993). Schools and social justice. Toronto: Our Schools/Our Selves Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1997). Schools, markets, justice: Education in a fractured world. Forum of Education, 52(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: Towards a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Counts, G. (1978 [1932]). Dare the school build a new social order? Carbondale: Arcturus Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H. (1995). Whole language: What’s all the fuss? An interview with Harvey Daniels. In D. Levine, R. Lowe, B. Peterson, & R. Tenorio (Eds.), Rethinking schools: An agenda for change (pp. 115–127). New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y., & Giardina, M. (2006). Disciplining qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 769–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diem, S., Young, M. D., Welton, A. D., Mansfield, K. C., & Lee, P.-L. (2014). The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1068–1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.916007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, K. (2004). Why our schools are failing. Sydney: Duffy & Snellgrove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Down, B. (2014). Reconceptualising teacher standards: Authentic, critical and creative. In B. Down & J. Smyth (Eds.), Critical voices in teacher education: Teaching for social justice in conservative times (pp. 63–80). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T., & Densmore, K. (2003). Engaging teachers: Towards a radical democratic agenda for schooling. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garman, N. (1995). Qualitative inquiry: Meaning and menace for educational researchers. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to educational research (pp. 3–11). Adelaide: Flinders Institute for the Study of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, S., Mahony, P., Hextall, I., & Cribb, A. (2009). Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges and ways forward. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. New York: Bergin & Harvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2004). The terror of neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the eclipse of democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, D., & Husbands, C. (2001). The performing school: Managing, teaching, and learning in a performance culture. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J., Barron, R., Holmes, K., & Smith, M. (2016). Who says we are not attracting the best and brightest? Teacher selection and the aspirations of Australian school students. Australian Educational Researcher, 43(5), 527–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L. (2015, 29 March). Lay off blaming new teachers for ‘falling’ standards. EduResearch Matters. http://www.aare.edu.au/blog/?p=964. Accessed 30 Nov 2016.

  • Greenberg, J., McKee, A., & Walsh, K. (2013). Teacher prep review: A review of the nation’s teacher preparation programs. New York: National Council on Teacher Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, E. (1994). Introduction. In E. Hatton (Ed.), Understanding teaching (pp. xv–xxi). Sydney: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. (2001a). Getting beyond the facts: Teaching social studies/social sciences in the twenty-first century (2nd ed.). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. (2001b). Hope in the shadows: Reconstructing the debate over educational standards. In J. Kincheloe & D. Weil (Eds.), Standards and schooling in the United States (Vol. 1, pp. 1–103). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. (2003). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. (2011). Meet me behind the iron curtain: The struggle for a critical postmodern action research. In K. Hayes, S. Steinberg, & K. Tobin (Eds.), Key works in critical pedagogy: Joe L. Kincheloe (pp. 85–99). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J., Slattery, P., & Steinberg, S. (2000). Contextualizing teaching: Introduction to education and educational foundations. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumashiro, K. (2004). Against common sense: Teaching and learning toward social justice. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). Testing regimes, accountability and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 539–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (2002 [1975). Schoolteacher (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K., Grummell, B., & Devine, D. (2015). New managerialism in education: Commercialization, carelessness and gender. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Ball, S. (2015). ‘Where you stand depends on where you sit’: The social construction of policy enactments in the (English) secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.977022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1971). The sociological imagination. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., & Goos, M. (2017). The place of research in teacher education? An analysis of the Australian Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group report Action now: Classroom ready teachers. In M. Peters, B. Cowie, & I. Mentor (Eds.), A companion to research in teacher education (pp. 637–650). Singapore: Springer Nature.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, K. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, A. (2009). A new thing in an old world? Instrumentalism, teacher education, and responsibility. In F. Benson & C. Riches (Eds.), Engaging in conversation about ideas in teacher education (pp. 106–116). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, A. M., & Sumsion, J. (2008) (Eds.). Critical readings in teacher education: Provoking absences. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raider-Roth, M. (2005). Trusting what you know: Negotiating the relational context of classroom life. Teachers College Record, 107(4), 587–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbe, M. (1998). The sociologically examined life: Pieces of the conversation. Mountain View: Mayfield Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, D. (2006, October 4). Howard rallies right in culture war assault. The Australian, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I. (1999). Preface: Two rivers of reform. In I. Shor & C. Pari (Eds.), Education is politics: Critical teaching across differences K–12 (pp. vii–ix). Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (1987). Educating teachers: Changing the nature of pedagogical knowledge. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (1992). Teachers’ work and the politics of reflection. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 267–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (2001). Critical politics of teachers’ work: An Australian perspective. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., & Shacklock, G. (1998). Re-making teaching: Ideology, policy and practice. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., Dow, A., Hattam, R., Reid, A., & Shacklock, G. (2000). Teachers’ work in a globalizing economy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., Angus, L., Down, B., & McInerney, P. (2009). Activist and socially critical school and community renewal: Social justice in exploitative times. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., Down, B., & McInerney, P. (2010). ‘Hanging in with kids’ in tough times: Engagement in contexts of educational disadvantage in the relational school. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snook, I., O’Neill, J., Clark, J., O’Neill, A., & Openshaw, R. (2009). Invisible learnings? A commentary on John Hattie’s book Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 44(1), 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, P. (1999). Standardized minds: The high price of America’s testing culture and what we can do to change it. New York: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., Rizvi, F., Lingard, B., & Henry, M. (1997). Educational policy and the politics of change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group. (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Canberra: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T. P., & Schubert, W. H. (2001). Reinterpreting teacher certification standards: Locating limitations and possibilities. In J. Kincheloe & D. Weil (Eds.), Standards and schooling in the United States, Vol. 1 (pp. 229–243). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference: Let’s be realistic! School mix, school effectiveness and the social limits of reform. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. (2005). Communities and schools: A new view of urban school reform. Harvard Educational Review, 75(2), 133–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, D. (2001). Goals of standards: World class standards? Whose world, which economic classes, and what standards. In J. Kincheloe & D. Weil (Eds.), Standards and schooling in the United States, Vol. 2 (pp. 505–533). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, A. (1996). Australian education: Reform or crisis? St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winton, S., & Tuters, S. (2015). Constructing bullying in Ontario, Canada: A critical policy analysis. Educational Studies, 41(1–2), 122–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., & Diem, S. (2014). Putting critical theoretical perspectives to work in educational policy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1063–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter is an outcome of the Retaining Quality Teachers Study funded by the Australian Research Council (LP130100830). The Principals Australia Institute contributed funds and in-kind support to this project. Note: the views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect Principals Australia Institute’s policies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barry Down .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Down, B., Sullivan, A. (2019). “Classroom-Ready Teachers”. In: Sullivan, A., Johnson, B., Simons, M. (eds) Attracting and Keeping the Best Teachers. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 16. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8621-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8621-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8620-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8621-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics