Advertisement

Hijacking Democracy? Spatialised Persecution and the Planning Process

  • Julie RudnerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the struggle of nationalist groups and their sympathisers to produce the city in their image by presenting specific historical and spatial imaginaries. These imaginaries distort how common placemaking processes and practices are interpreted, experienced, and discussed. The chapter uses a case study from the regional city of Bendigo, Australia, to show how protestors and formal objectors to a proposed mosque sought to exert their power over political debate about the future -symbolically, materially, and spatially. However, their engagement with the planning system led to feelings of persecution, as their urban imaginaries were confronted with the institutional and moral imperatives of a multicultural society. ‘Hijacking Democracy?’ reveals the conflicts that arise with urban transformation and highlights the need for policy makers, journalists, and others to identify and recognise the rational elements of extremist views, to better engage with people who might be attracted to anti-Islamic ideology.

References

  1. Aicher, J. (1998). Designing Healthy Cities: Prescriptions, Principles and Practice. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, G. (2006). Solastalgia. Alternatives, 32(4–5), 34–36.Google Scholar
  3. Allmendinger, P., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (Eds.). (2002). Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (1994). The Reinvention of Politics: Towards a Theory of Reflexive Modernization. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (pp. 1–55). Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beynon, D. (2009). Architecture, Multiculturalism and Cultural Sustainability in Australian Cities. The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 5(2), 45–57.Google Scholar
  7. Bowker, S. (2016, September 22). Friday Essay: The Australian Mosque. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/friday-essay-the-australian-mosque-65101.
  8. Bugg, L., & Gurran, N. (2011). Urban Planning Process and Discourses in the Refusal of Islamic Schools in Sydney, Australia. Australian Planner, 48(4), 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burayidi, M. A. (2003). The Multicultural City as Planners’ Enigma. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(3), 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooke, M. (1997). Authenticity and Autonomy: Taylor, Habermas, and the Politics of Recognition. Political Theory, 25(2), 258–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Dovey, K. (2001). Framing Places: Mediating Power in the Built Form. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Dovey, K. (2010). Becoming Places: Urbanism/Architecture/Identity/Power. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Dovey, K. (2011). Uprooting Critical Urbanism. City, 15(3–4), 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunn, K., & Hopkins, P. (2016). The Geographies of Everyday Muslim Life in the West. Australian Geographer, 47(3), 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evers v Greater Bendigo CC & [2014] VCAT 816.Google Scholar
  17. Fincher, R., Iveson, K., Leitner, H., & Preston, V. (2014). Planning in the Multicultural City: Celebrating Diversity or Reinforcing Difference? Progress in Planning, 92(0), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forrest, J., & Dunn, K. (2010). Attitudes to Multicultural Values in Diverse Spaces in Australia’s Immigrant Cities, Sydney and Melbourne. Space and Polity, 14(1), 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freestone, R. (2004). The Americanization of Australian Planning. Journal of Planning History, 3(3), 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garde, G., & Baird, M. (2015). Hoskin v Greater Bendigo CC and Anor [2015] VCAT 1124. Melbourne: Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.Google Scholar
  21. Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a Post-traditional Society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (pp. 56–109). Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gleeson, B., & Low, N. (2000). Australian Urban Planning: New Challenges, New Agendas. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  23. Google Earth. (2016). Bendigo, Australia. 36O45’32.68”S, 144O16’57.32”E Eye Alt 3 km. Digital Globe. Retrieved December 21, 2015, from https://www.google.com/earth/.
  24. Habermas, J. (2015). The Theory of Communicative Action Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Harris, J. (2013). Tradition, Identity and Adaptation: Mosque Architecture in South-east Queensland. Paper presented at the 30, Open, Goldcoast.Google Scholar
  26. Heller, A. (2005). The Three Logics of Modernity and the Double Bind of the Modern Imagination. Thesis Eleven, 81(1), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hervieu-Léger, D. (2002). Space and Religion: New Approaches to Religious Spatiality in Modernity. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(1), 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoskin v Greater Bendigo CC and Anor [2015] VCAT 1124 (court document). Retrieved June 26, 2019, from https://www.vcat.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/hoskin_v_greater_bendigo_cc_and_%20Anor_p1142_and_p1395-2014.pdf.
  29. ID Consulting Pty Ltd. (2016). Community Profile: 2011 and 2016 Enumerated Census Information for the City of Greater Bendigo. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://profile.id.com.au/bendigo.
  30. Ipperciel, D. (2010). Habermas, Taylor et le nationalisme québécois. Dialogue, 40(3), 529–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Iveson, K., & Fincher, R. (2008). Planning for Diversity: Redistribution, Recognition and Encounter. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Jackson, S., Porter, L., & Johnson, L. C. (2017). Planning in Indigenous Australia: From Imperial Foundations to Postcolonial Futures. London: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kiong, T. C., & Kong, L. (2000). Religion and Modernity: Ritual Transformations and the Reconstruction of Space and Time. Social & Cultural Geography, 1(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knott, K. (2010). Religion, Space, and Place: The Spatial Turn in Research on Religion. Religion and Society, 1(1), 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knott, K., & Franks, M. (2007). Secular Values and the Location of Religion: A Spatial Analysis of an English Medical Centre. Health & Place, 13(1), 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Knott, K., Krech, V., & Meyer, B. (2016). Iconic Religion in Urban Space. Material Religion, 12(2), 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kong, L. (2010). Global Shifts, Theoretical Shifts: Changing Geographies of Religion. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 755–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lefebrve, H. (1967). Le droit à la ville. L’Homme et la Société, 6, 29–35.Google Scholar
  39. Lefebrve, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford and Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Lefebrve, H. (2000). Writings on Cities (Selected, Trans. and Introduced by E. Kofman & E. Lebas, Trans., 4th ed.). Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Legacy, C., March, A., & Mouat, C. M. (2014). Limits and Potentials to Deliberative Engagement in Highly Regulated Planning Systems: Norm Development Within Fixed Rules. Planning Theory & Practice, 15(1), 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Luz, N. (2015). Planning with Resurgent Religion: Informality and Gray Spacing of the Urban Landscape. Planning Theory & Practice, 16(2), 278–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mansouri, F., Lobo, M., & Johns, A. (2016). Grounding Religiosity in Urban Space: Insights from Multicultural Melbourne. Australian Geographer, 47(3), 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mansouri, F., Lobo, M., Turner, B. S., & Johns, A. (2017). Islamic Religiosity in the West: Belonging and Political Engagement in Multicultural Cities. Retrieved December 13, 2018, from www.deakin.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/1029981/Islamic_Religiosity_220x275mm_FA.pdf.
  45. March, A. (2012). The Democratic Plan: Analysis & Diagnosis. Farhham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  46. Marcuse, P. (2014). Reading the Right to the City. City, 18(1), 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Medhora, S. (2015, December 8). Tony Abbott Says Political Future Not ‘Entirely Resolved’, But Hints He Will Stay in Parliament. The Guardian. Retrieved December 13, 2018, from http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/dec/08/tony-abbott-political-future-not-resolved-but-hints-he-will-stay-in-parliament.
  48. Mouat, C., Legacy, C., & March, A. (2013). The Problem is the Solution: Testing Agonistic Theory’s Potential to Recast Intractable Planning Disputes. Urban Policy and Research, 31(2), 150–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Osborn, W. C. J., & Santamaria, J. J. A. (2015). Hoskin & ANOR v Greater Bendigo City Council & ORS [2015] VSCA 350. Melbourne: Supreme Court of Victoria—Court of Appeal.Google Scholar
  50. Porteous, J. D. (1977). Environment & Behaviour: Planning and Everyday Urban Life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
  51. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical World Socialization of the Self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Qadeer, M. A. (1997). Pluralistic Planning for Multicultural Cities: The Canadian Practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(4), 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Radford, D. (2017). Space, Place and Identity: Intercultural Encounters, Affect and Belonging in Rural Australian Spaces. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 38(5), 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rudner, J. (2017). Social Cohesion in Bendigo: Understanding Community Attitudes to the Mosque in 2015. Melbourne: Victorian Multicultural Commission.Google Scholar
  55. Saint-Blancat, C. (2002). Islam in Diaspora: Between Reterritorialization and Extraterritoriality. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(1), 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shahani, F., de Cotta, T., & Rudner, J. (2017). An Imagined Islamic Space in Multicultural Melbourne: A Focus on Lefebrve’s Representational Space. Spaces and Flows, 9(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  57. Spohn, U. (2015). A Difference in Kind? Jürgen Habermas and Charles Taylor on Post-secularism. The European Legacy, 20(2), 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Taylor, C. (2007). A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Tremlett, P.-F. (2013). Religion and Spatial Analysis. Material Religion, 9(1), 116–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tse, J. K. H. (2013). Grounded Theologies: ‘Religion’ and the ‘Secular’ in Human Geography. Progress in Human Geography, 38(2), 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tuan, Y.-F. (1980). Rootedness Versus Sense of Place. Landscape, 24, 3–8.Google Scholar
  62. Valverde, M. (2005). Taking Landuse Seriously. Law and Culture, 9, 34–59.Google Scholar
  63. Verkaaik, O. (2014). Religious Architecture: Anthropological Perspectives. In O. Verkaaik (Ed.), Religious Architecture: Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 7–24). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Waller, L., Hess, K., & Demetrious, K. (2016). Twitter Feeders: An Analysis of Dominant ‘Voices’ and Patterns in a Local Government Mosque Controversy. Australian Journalism Review, 38(2), 47–60.Google Scholar
  65. Watson, S. (2009). Performing Religion: Migrants, the Church and Belonging in Marrickville, Sydney. Culture and Religion, 10(3), 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Watson, S. (2017). Making Multiculturalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(15), 2635–2652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Watson, S., & Zanetti, O. (2016). Religion as Practices of Attachment and Materiality: The Making of Buddhism in Contemporary London. Culture and Religion, 17(3), 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zwilling, A.-L. (2012). L’architecture des mosquées en France: Construire ou édifier? Revue des Sciences Religieuses, 86(3), 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Community Planning and DevelopmentLa Trobe UniversityBendigoAustralia

Personalised recommendations