Advertisement

Delamination Detection via Reconstructed Frequency Response Function of Composite Structures

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Online damage detection technologies could reduce the weight of structures by allowing the use of less conservative margins of safety. They are also associated with high economical benefits by implementing a condition-based maintenance system. This paper presented a damage detection and location technique based on the dynamic response of glass fibre composite laminate structures (frequency response function). Glass fibre composite laminate plates of \(200 \times 200 \times 2.64\) mm, which had a predefined delamination, were excited using stationary random vibration waves of 500 Hz band-limited noise input at \(\approx {1.5}\) g. The response of the structure was captured via Micro-ElectroMechanical System (MEMS) accelerometer to detect damage. The frequency response function requires data from damaged structures only, assuming that healthy structures are homogeneous and smooth. The frequency response of the composite structure was then reconstructed and fitted using the least-squares rational function method. Delamination as small as 20 mm was detected using global changes in the natural frequencies of the structure, the delamination was also located with greater degree of accuracy due to local changes of frequency response of the structure. It was concluded that environmental vibration waves (stationary random vibration waves) can be utilised to monitor damage and health of composite structures effectively.

Keywords

Frequency response function (FRF) Structural health monitoring (SHM) Structural integrity Damage assessment 

References

  1. 1.
    Balageas, D., Fritzen, C.P., Güemes, A. (eds.): Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 90. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Worden, K., Farrar, C.R., Manson, G., Park, G.: The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 463(2082), 1639–1664 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu, W.Y., Tang, B.P., Han, J.G., Lu, X.N., Hu, N.N., He, Z.Z.: The structure healthy condition monitoring and fault diagnosis methods in wind turbines: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 44, 466–472 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farrar, C.R., Lieven, N.A.: Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365(1851), 623–632 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sohn, H., Czarnecki, J.A., Farrar, C.R.: Structural health monitoring using statistical process control. J. Struct. Eng. 126(11), 1356–1363 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang, F.K.: Structural health monitoring: a summary report on the first international workshop on structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, 18–20 September 1997. Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1999 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Niezrecki, C.: Structural health monitoring & damage detection, vol. 7Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B., Shevitz, D.W.: Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review (No. LA-13070-MS). Los Alamos National Lab., NM, USA (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alamdari, M.M., Li, J., Samali, B.: FRF-based damage localization method with noise suppression approach. J. Sound Vib. 333(14), 3305–3320 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peng, Z.K., Lang, Z.Q., Billings, S.A.: Crack detection using nonlinear output frequency response functions. J. Sound Vib. 301(3–5), 777–788 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Broch, J.T.: Mechanical vibration and shock measurements (1980)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trampe Broch, J.: Mechanical Vibration and Shock Measurements, 2nd edn. Bruel & Kjaer, Naerum (1984)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rao, S.S., Yap, F.F.: Mechanical Vibrations, vol. 4. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Welch, P.: The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 15(2), 70–73 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ozdemir, A., Gumussoy, S.: Transfer function estimation in system identification toolbox via vector fitting. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50(1), 6232–6237 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of ChesterChesterEngland, UK

Personalised recommendations