Advertisement

Promoting Online Learning Community with Identity Transparency

  • Na SunEmail author
  • Mary Beth Rosson
  • John M. Carroll
Chapter
  • 793 Downloads
Part of the Smart Computing and Intelligence book series (SMCOMINT)

Abstract

This book chapter is a synthesis of several empirical user studies of online learners enrolled in degree-earning educational programs. Our findings are drawn from interviews with both online students and instructors, regarding their perceptions and strategies of fostering an online community of learners. In contrast to traditional formal education that takes place in a residential campus, or informal learning communities that are often light-weight and transient, we have been studying the nature and role of community within the growing arena of online education. In this chapter, we present and discuss our findings from multiple standpoints, offering design implications that might help designers of information systems to support socially mediated learning experiences, especially with regards to online students’ identity cues.

Keywords

Online community Online learning Social connections 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the many students of World Campus who responded to the survey, and instructors who either participated in our interview study, or helped recruit participants in their classes. This research was partially supported by a Research Initiation Grant from Penn State’s Center for Online Innovation and Learning, and by the College of Information Sciences and Technology.

References

  1. Appiah-Kubi, K., & Rowland, D., PEER support in MOOCs: The role of social presence. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 237–240). ACM.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2876034.2893423.
  2. Ashar, H., & Skenes, R. (1993). Can Tinto’s student departure model be applied to nontraditional students? Adult Education Quarterly, 43(2), 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benda, K., Bruckman, A., & Guzdial, M. (2012). When Life and Learning Do Not Fit. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 12(4), 1–38.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2382564.2382567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borge, M., & Goggins, S. (2014). Towards the facilitation of an online community of learners: Assessing the quality of interactions in Yammer. In Proceedings of ICLS (Vol. 14, pp. 753–761).Google Scholar
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, D. J., McHugh, D., Standen, P., Evett, L., Shopland, N., & Battersby, S. (2011). Designing location-based learning experiences for people with intellectual disabilities and additional sensory impairments. Computers & Education, 56(1), 11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, R. E. (2001). The process of community-building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 5(2), 18–35.Google Scholar
  8. Cao, X., Sellen, A., Brush, A. J. B., Kirk, D., Edge, D., & Ding, X. (2010). Understanding family communication across time zones, in Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work—CSCW’10, p. 155.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718947.
  9. Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of Higher Education, A39–A41.Google Scholar
  10. Clegg, T., Yip, J. C., Ahn, J., Bonsignore, E., Gubbels, M., Lewittes, B., et al. (2013). When face-to-face fails: Opportunities for social media to foster collaborative learning. Citeseer: In Tenth international conference on computer supported collaborative learning.Google Scholar
  11. Coetzee, D., Fox, A., Hearst, M. A., & Hartmann, B. (2014). Chatrooms in MOOCs : All Talk and No Action. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference—L@S’14, 127–136.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566242.
  12. Du, H., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2012). Augmenting classroom participation through public digital backchannels. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP’12), pp. 155–164.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2389176.2389201.
  13. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.Google Scholar
  14. Ferguson, E., & Cox, T. (1993). Exploratory Factor Analysis : A Users’ Guide, 1(2), 84–94.Google Scholar
  15. Ferschke, O., Howley, I., Tomar, G., Yang, D., Liu, Y., & Rosé, C. P. (2015). Fostering discussion across communication media in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, in review.Google Scholar
  16. Gašević, D., Zouaq, A., & Janzen, R. (2013). Choose your classmates, your GPA is at stake! American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1460–1479.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goggins, S. P., Laffey, J., & Gallagher, M. (2011). Completely online group formation and development: small groups as socio-technical systems. Information Technology & People, 24(2), 104–133.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09593841111137322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guo, Z., Tan, F. B., & Cheung, K. (2010). Students’ uses and gratifications for using computer-mediated communication media in learning contexts students’ uses and gratifications for using computer -mediated communication media in learning contexts students’ uses and gratifications for using C. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27(20), 339–378.Google Scholar
  19. Hallberg, L. R. M. (2006). The “core category” of grounded theory: Making constant comparisons. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 1(3), 141–148.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620600858399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haythornthwaite, C. (2000). Online personal networks: Size, composition and media use among distance learners. New Media and Society.  https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440022225779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M., Robins, J., & Shoemaker, S. (2000). Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 6(1), 0.Google Scholar
  22. Kena, G., Musu-Gillette, L., Robinson, J., Wang, X., Rathbun, A., Zhang, J., … Velez, E. D. V. (2015). The condition of education 2015. NCES 2015-144. National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  23. Kizilcec, R. F., & Halawa, S. (2015). Attrition and achievement gaps in online learning. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale - L@S ’15, (pp 57–66). https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724680.
  24. Koh, M. H., Barbour, M., & Hill, J. R. (2010). Strategies for instructors on how to improve online groupwork. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(2), 183–205.  https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.43.2.c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kulkarni, C. Nmay, Cambre, J., Kotturi, Y., Bernstein, M. S., & Klemmer, S. R. (2015). Talkabout: making distance matter with small groups in massive classes. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing—CSCW’15, pp. 1116–1128.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675166.
  26. Lampe, C., Wash, R., Velasquez, A., & Ozkaya, E. (2010). Motivations to participate in online communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1927–1936.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753616.
  27. Liebman, N., & Gergle, D. (2016). It’s (Not) simply a matter of time: The relationship between CMC cues and interpersonal affinity. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 570–581.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819945.
  28. Marlow, J., & Dabbish, L. (2012). Designing interventions to reduce psychological distance in globally distributed teams. Cscw’12, 163–166.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2141512.2141568.
  29. Mcelrath, E., & Mcdowell, K. (2008). Pedagogical strategies for building community in graduate level distance education courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  30. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass Inc Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  32. Mustafaraj, E., & Bu, J. (2015). The visible and invisible in a MOOC discussion forum. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale—L@S’15, 351–354.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2728691.
  33. Peterson, N. A., Speer, P. W., & McMillan, D. W. (2008). Validation of a brief sense of community scale: Confirmation of the principal theory of sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1), 61–73.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rovai, A. P., Wighting, M. J., & Lucking, R. (2004). The classroom and school community inventory: Development, refinement, and validation of a self-report measure for educational research. Internet and Higher Education, 7(4), 263–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shachar, M., & Neumann, Y. (2003). Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances : A meta-analytic approach. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2).Google Scholar
  36. Shelley, M. (2008). Considering students’ perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model Ismail Sahin. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 216–223.  https://doi.org/10.2307/jeductechsoci.11.3.216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Soller, A., Wiebe, J., & Lesgold, A. (2002). A machine learning approach to assessing knowledge sharing during collaborative learning activities. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Foundations for a CSCL Community—CSCL’02, (1), 128.  https://doi.org/10.3115/1658616.1658635.
  38. Stahl, G. (2011). Theories of cognition in CSCW. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2011) (pp. 193–212).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-913-0_11.Google Scholar
  39. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Strijbos, J. W., & De Laat, M. F. (2010). Developing the role concept for computer-supported collaborative learning: An explorative synthesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 495–505.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stuart, H. C., Dabbish, L., Kiesler, S., Kinnaird, P., & Kang, R. (2012). Social transparency in networked information exchange. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW’12, 451.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145275.
  42. Sun, N., & Rosson, M. B. (2017). Finding the community in online education: It’s in the instructors’ eyes. Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  43. Sun, N., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2018). Where is community among online learners?: Identity, efficacy and personal ties. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 292). ACM.Google Scholar
  44. Sun, N., Wang, X., & Rosson, M.B. (2019). How do distance learners connect? In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19) (p.12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Paper 432. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300662.
  45. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research Winter, 45(1), 89–125.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.Google Scholar
  47. Walther, J. B. (2002). Time effects in computer-mediated groups: Past, present, and future. Distributed Work, 235–257.Google Scholar
  48. Williams, B. A. (2015). Peers in MOOCs: Lessons based on the education production function, collective action, and an experiment. In 2nd ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, L@S 2015, 287–292.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2728677.
  49. Xing, W., Kim, S., & Goggins, S. (2015). Modeling performance in asynchronous CSCL: An exploration of social ability, collective efficacy and social interaction. Exploring the Material Conditions of Learning: Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2015), International Society of the Learning Sciences, 276–283. Retrieved from https://www.isls.org/cscl2015/papers/MC-0268-FullPaper-Goggins.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Information Sciences and TechnologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.College of Information Sciences and TechnologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  3. 3.College of Information Sciences and TechnologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations