The GlobalEd 2 Project: Interdisciplinary Simulations Promoting Students’ Socio-scientific Literacy
- 760 Downloads
Problem-based learning (PBL) is an instructional design approach designed to facilitate student learning in context-rich settings. GlobalEd2 (GE2) is a PBL curriculum intervention that combines face-to-face and online learning environments into a 14-week multi-player (N > 400) simulation of international negotiations among students in the roles of science delegates on global socio-scientific issues. Although GE2 focuses on science and written argumentation, it is implemented within social science classes that can span time zones, geographic and social boundaries while engaging 400+ middle-grade students in an authentically rich and engaging learning environment. This chapter describes the structural components that have made GE2 successful in promoting student learning across middle school grades, high school, college, and professional education. Further, the GE2 provides a multiyear set of data revealing GE2’s impact on students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors (KABs). Implications are discussed regarding the instructional framework that has enabled GE2 to successfully evolve over the past 15 years and the future plans for development.
KeywordsProblem-based learning Simulations Interdisciplinary learning
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1992). Theory into practice: How do we link? In T. M. Duffy & D. J. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
- Boyer, M. A., Florea, N., Butler, M., Brown, S. W., Meng, L., Johnson, P. R., & Lima, C., (2005). Understanding security through the eyes of the young, in The IPE yearbook published by Lynne Reinner Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, S. W. (2007, January). The GlobalEd project goes international: The Cyprus Project. Presentation at The Doves Olympic Movement Leadership Conference, Agros, Cyprus.Google Scholar
- Brown, S. W., Boyer, M. A., Johnson, P. R., Lima, C. O., Butler, M., Florea, N., & Rich, J. (2004). The GlobalEd Project: Problem-solving and decision making in a web-based PBL. In Conference Proceedings of Edu-Media, June 24, 2004. Lugano, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Brown, S. W., Boyer, M. A., Mayall, H. J., Johnson, P. R., Meng, L., Butler, M. J., ... Reis, S. (2003). The GlobalEd project: Gender differences in a problem-based learning environment of international negotiations. Instructional Science, 31(4–5), 255–276.Google Scholar
- Brown, S. W., & Lawless, K. A. (2014). Promoting students’ writing skills in science through an educational simulation: The GlobalEd 2 project. In P. Zaphiris (Ed.) Human-computer interaction, Part I, HCII 2014, LNCS 8523 (pp. 371–379). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Brown, S. W., Lawless, K. A., & Boyer, M. A., (2009, October). The GlobalEd 2 Project: Expanding the science and literacy curricular space. In T. Bastiaens et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2009 (pp. 160–164). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/32449.
- Brown, S. W., Lawless, K. A., & Boyer, M. A. (2013). Promoting positive academic dispositions using a web-based PBL environment: The GlobalEd 2 Project. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 7(1), 67–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1389.
- Brown, S. W., Lawless, K. A., & Boyer, M. A. (2015). The GlobalEd 2 simulations: Promoting positive academic dispositions in middle school students in a web-based PBL environment (pp. 147–159). In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. Hmelo-Silver, & P. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, S. W., Lawless, K. A., Rhoads, C., Newton, S. D., & Lynn, L. (2016, October). Increasing students’ science writing skills through a PBL simulation. In D. Sampson, J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, & P. Isaias (Eds.), Proceedings of The 13th IADIS International Conference Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA) (pp. 86–94). Mannheim, Germany: International Association for Development of the Information Society.Google Scholar
- Brown, S. W., Lawless, K. A., Newton, S. D., Lynn, L., Riel, J., Song, S., & Oren, J. (2018, February 9). Increasing students’ engagement with STEM through a PBL simulation. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Clearwater, FL.Google Scholar
- Dede, C. (2009). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. Harvard Graduate School of Education. Retrieved December 7, 2018, from http://sttechnology.pbworks.com/f/Dede_(2010)_Comparing%20Frameworks%20for%2021st%20Century%20Skills.pdf.
- Fadel, C. (2008). 21st century skills: How can you prepare students for the new global economy? Paper presented at the OECD/CERI Conference in Paris, France in May 2008.Google Scholar
- Florea, N., Boyer, M. A., Brown, S. W., Butler, M. J., Hernandez, M., Weir, K. ... Lima, C. (2003). Negotiating from Mars to Venus: Some findings on gender’s impact in simulated international negotiations. Simulation and Games, 34(2), 226–248.Google Scholar
- Goodnough, K. C., & Hung, W. (2008). Engaging teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge: Adopting a nine-step problem-based learning model. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 2(2), 61–90.Google Scholar
- Graham, S. (2015, April 26). Preparing for the 21st century: Soft skills matter. Huffington Post. Retrieved December 8, 2018, from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/stedman-graham/preparing-for-the-21st-ce_b_6738538.html.
- Greening, T. (1998). Scaffolding for success in problem-based learning. Medical Education Online, 3(4), 1–15.Google Scholar
- Jonassen, D. H. (2009). Assembling and analyzing the building blocks of problem-based learning environments. In K. H. Silber & W. R. Foshay (Eds.), Handbook of improving performance in the workplace, volume one: Instructional design and training delivery. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
- Koschmann, T. D., Kelson, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1996). Computer-supported problem-based learning: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 83–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (in press). Promoting global citizenship and STEM literacies with a GlobalEd simulation. In C. Wright-Maley (Ed.), Teaching life itself: Simulations as powerful and purposeful social studies. Information Age Publishing; Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Lawless, K. A., Brown, S. W., & Boyer, M. A. (2016). Educating students for STEM literacy: GlobalEd 2. In R. D. Lansiquot (Ed.), Technology, theory and practice in interdisciplinary STEM programs: Connecting STEM and non-STEM approaches (pp. 53–82). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-56738-3. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56739-0.Google Scholar
- Lawless, K. A., Brown, S. W., Rhoads, C., Lynn, L., Newton, S. D., Brodowiska, K. B., … Song, S. (2017). Promoting students’ science literacy skills through a simulation of international negotiations: The GlobalEd 2 project. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mansilla, V. B., Jackson, A., & Jacobs, I. H. (2013). Educating for global competence: Learning redefined for an interconnected world. In Mastering global literacy (pp. 5–27). New York: Solution Tree.Google Scholar
- Midgette, E., Haria, P., & MacArthur, C. (2008). The effects of content and audience awareness goals for revision on the persuasive essays of fifth- and eighth-grade students. Reading and Writing, 21(1–2), 131–151.Google Scholar
- Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College, School of Education. Retrieved from http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/Beyond%202000.pdf.
- National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (NRC). (2011). Retrieved June 15, 2012, from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_idD13165.
- Newcombe, N. S., Ambady, N., Eccles, J., Gomez, L., Klahr, D., Linn, M., Miller, K., & Mix, K. (2009). Psychology’s role in mathematics and science education. American Psychologist, 64(6), 538–550.Google Scholar
- Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). (2013). Retrieved January 12, 2018, from https://www.nextgenscience.org/.
- Osborne, J. F., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Ideas, evidence and argument in science: In-service training pack, resource pack and video. London: Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
- Riel, J., Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (2016). Listening to the teachers: Using weekly online teacher logs for ROPD to identify teachers’ persistent challenges when implementing a blended learning curriculum. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(2), 169–200.Google Scholar
- Riel, J., Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (2017). Defining and designing responsive online professional development (ROPD): A framework to support curriculum implementation. In T. Kidd & L.R. Morris, Jr. (Eds.), Handbook of research on instructional systems and technology (Chapter 10, pp. 104–115). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. ISBN 9781522523994.Google Scholar
- Riel, J., Lawless, K., & Brown, S. W. (2018). Timing matters: Approaches for measuring and visualizing behaviours of timing and spacing of work in self-paced online teacher professional development courses. Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2018.51.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (1996). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design educational technology (2nd printing ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610–645.Google Scholar
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Published in The Systems Thinker. Retrieved from https://thesystemsthinker.com/communities-of-practice-learning-as-a-social-system/.
- Yukhymenko, M. (2011). Students’ interest in social studies and negotiation self-efficacy: A meta-analysis of the GlobalEd project. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(3), 369–392.Google Scholar
- Zhao, Y. (2009). Catching up or leading the way: American education in the age of globalization. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar