Quantitative Fire Risk Assessment and Management

  • Jeom Kee PaikEmail author
Part of the Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality book series (TSRQ, volume 37)


Fire hazards exist in natural and industrial environments and in people’s homes. Fire is one of the most significant accident types that result in catastrophe in terms of personnel, assets, and the environment. This chapter presents a procedure for the quantitative assessment and management of fire risks in structures and infrastructures, with a focus on industrial applications associated with hydrocarbons. An illustrative example of fire risk assessment for offshore installations is presented. This quantitative procedure contrasts the prescriptive procedures associated with the rules and qualitative approaches of risk assessment and management.


  1. 1.
    Cameron IT, Raman R (2005) Process systems risk management. Elsevier, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crawley F, Tyler B (2003) Hazard identification methods. Institution of Chemical Engineers, Warwickshire, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Drysdale D (2011) An introduction to fire dynamics, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Franssen JM, Real PV (2010) Fire design of steel structures. ECCS Eurocode design manuals. Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hare J, Goff R, Burrell G, McGillivray (2017) Offshore accident and failure frequency data sources—review and recommendations. Health and Safety Executive, Research Report RR1114, Derbyshire, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mannan S (2005) Lees’ loss prevention in the process industries—hazard identification, assessment and control, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    NFPA-921 (2017) Guide for fire and explosion investigations. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    NIST (2018) National Institute of Standards and Technology. U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nolan DP (1996) Handbook of fire and explosion protection engineering principles for oil, gas, chemical, and related facilities. Noyes Publications, Westwood, NJ, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    NORSOK (2010) Risk and emergency preparedness assessment. Z-013, 3rd edn, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Novozhilov V (2001) Computational fluid dynamics modeling of compartment fires. Prog Energy Combust Sci 27:611–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paik JK, Kim JH, Park SI, Islam S, Lee DH (2013) A new procedure for the nonlinear structural response analysis of offshore installations in fires. SNAME Maritime Convention, The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 6–8 November, Bellevue, WA, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Purkis JA (2006) Fire safety engineering—design of structures, 2nd edn. Elsevier, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spouge J (1999) A guide to quantitative risk assessment for offshore installations. DNV Technica, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vinnem JE (2007) Offshore risk assessment—principles, modelling and application of QRA studies. Springer, Stavanger, NorwayzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.The Korea Ship and Offshore Research Institute (Lloyd’s Register Foundation Research Centre of Excellence)Pusan National UniversityBusanKorea (Republic of)

Personalised recommendations