Skip to main content

Why Use Social, Critical and Political Theories in Educational Leadership?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social, Critical and Political Theories for Educational Leadership

Part of the book series: Educational Leadership Theory ((ELT))

Abstract

This chapter provides the rationale for the book and why it is important to consider a range of theoretical approaches to the study of educational leadership. The book sets out to build on previous critical traditions but also draws on a different set of theoretical resources to generate new and different ways of understanding educational leadership and, more importantly, the context in which such a phenomenon is analysed. The chapter sets out to address the need for an understanding of context in education in different ways from how it has traditionally been used or promoted as simply important but lacking any critical analysis of what this means or entails. In doing so, the chapter argues the need for theoretical work in educational leadership. Further discussions in relation to post-structuralism are explored as well as the use of voice and positionality in writing a co-authored text. The final section then provides an overview of the book.

What is important in a text is not what it means, but what it does and incites to do. What it does: the charge of affect it contains and transmits. What it incites to do: the metamorphoses of this potential energy into other things…

Lyotard (1984, pp. 9–10)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although we acknowledge the work of Bernard Stiegler in certain texts has engaged with educational issues (see Stiegler, 2010, 2015).

  2. 2.

    Derrida famously uttered ‘This (therefore) will not have been a book’ (Derrida, 1981, p. 3) at the start of the book Dissemination. Derrida then proceeds to deconstruct the functioning and purpose of the preface and its role in a book. Derrida also included introductions in this section so we have reworded this quote to reflect this instance.

References

  • Adorno, T. W. (1991). In J. M. Bernstein (Ed.), The culture industry: Selected essays on mass culture. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity. Human Relations, 65(3), 367–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and poststructural approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (1999). Troubling women: Feminism, leadership and educational change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2017). Educational leadership and Nancy Fraser. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherryholmes, C. H. (1988). Power and criticism: Poststructural investigations in education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2013). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. London/New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (1993). Poststructuralist theory and classroom practice. Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1981). Dissemination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eacott, S. (2015). Educational leadership relationally: A theory and methodology for educational leadership, management and administration. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • English, F. W. (2002). The point of scientificity, the fall of the epistemological dominos, and the end of the field of educational administration. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21, 109–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, F. W. (2003). The postmodern challenge to the practice of educational administration. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (2013). Methodological individualism, educational administration and leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(2), 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, T. (2003a). Interrogating orthodox voices: Gender, ethnicity and educational leadership. School Leadership & Management, 23(4), 431–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, T. (2003b). Changing the deafening silence of indigenous women’s voices in educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(1), 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). What is an author? In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault (pp. 113–138). New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2000). Polemics, politics and problematizations. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Ethics, essential works of Foucault 1954–1984: Volume 1 (pp. 111–119). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, D. (2013). Michel Foucault and educational leadership. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gowlett, C. (2013). Deterritorialising the dominant assemblage of social justice research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(1), 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowlett, C., & Rasmussen, M. L. (2014). The cultural politics of queer theory in education research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(3), 331–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.888838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowlett, C., & Rasmussen, M. L. (Eds.). (2016). The cultural politics of queer theory in education research. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2003). Leadership: Who needs it? School Leadership and Management, 23(3), 267–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H. (2001). Leaders and leadership in education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H. (2010). A sociological approach to educational leadership. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(4), 519–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H. (2012). Leadership and the reform of education. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H. (2013). Educational leadership and Hannah Arendt. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H. (2016). An intellectual history of school leadership practice and research. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H., & Ribbins, P. (2002). Leadership studies in education: Towards a map of the field. Educational Management and Administration, 30(4), 387–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (9th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, B. (2012). The end of leadership. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakomski, G. (2005). Managing without leadership: Towards a theory of organizational functioning. London: Elsevier.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakomski, G., Eacott, S., & Evers, C. W. (Eds.). (2017). Questioning leadership: New directions for educational organisations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1984). Driftworks. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1988). The differend: Phrases in dispute. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxcy, S. (1991). Educational leadership: A critical pragmatic perspective. New York: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxcy, S. (Ed.). (1994). Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niesche, R. (2011). Foucault and educational leadership: Disciplining the principal. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niesche, R. (2013). Deconstructing educational leadership: Derrida and Lyotard. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niesche, R. (2018). Critical perspectives in educational leadership: A new ‘theory turn’? Journal of Educational Administration and History, 50, 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niesche, R., & Gowlett, C. (2015). Advocating a post-structuralist politics for educational leadership. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(4), 372–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niesche, R., & Keddie, A. (2016). Leadership, ethics and schooling for social justice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, R. J., Gore, J. M., & Elsworth, W. (2010). After poststructuralism: Rethinking the discourse of social justice pedagogy. In T. Chapman & N. Hobbel (Eds.), Language, culture and teaching: Social justice pedagogy across the curriculum (pp. 164–182). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A. (Ed.). (1998). Naming the multiple: Poststructuralism and education. New York: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A., & Burbles, N. C. (2004). Poststructuralism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (2010). Taking care of youth and the generations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (2011). The decadence of industrial democracies: Disbelief and discredit, volume 1. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (2015). States of shock: Stupidity and knowledge in the 21st century. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P. (2017). Educational leadership and Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp, M. (2003). The school leadership literature in managerialist times: Exploring the problem of textual apologism. School Leadership and Management, 23(2), 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, R., & Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and education. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. (2008). Good intentions are not enough: A critical examination of diversity and educational leadership scholarship. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 40(2), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youdell, D. (2011). School trouble: Identity, power and politics in education. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. (2018). What works may hurt: Side effects in education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Niesche, R., Gowlett, C. (2019). Why Use Social, Critical and Political Theories in Educational Leadership?. In: Social, Critical and Political Theories for Educational Leadership. Educational Leadership Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8241-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8241-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8240-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8241-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics