Abstract
This chapter provides the rationale for the book and why it is important to consider a range of theoretical approaches to the study of educational leadership. The book sets out to build on previous critical traditions but also draws on a different set of theoretical resources to generate new and different ways of understanding educational leadership and, more importantly, the context in which such a phenomenon is analysed. The chapter sets out to address the need for an understanding of context in education in different ways from how it has traditionally been used or promoted as simply important but lacking any critical analysis of what this means or entails. In doing so, the chapter argues the need for theoretical work in educational leadership. Further discussions in relation to post-structuralism are explored as well as the use of voice and positionality in writing a co-authored text. The final section then provides an overview of the book.
What is important in a text is not what it means, but what it does and incites to do. What it does: the charge of affect it contains and transmits. What it incites to do: the metamorphoses of this potential energy into other things…
Lyotard (1984, pp. 9–10)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Derrida famously uttered ‘This (therefore) will not have been a book’ (Derrida, 1981, p. 3) at the start of the book Dissemination. Derrida then proceeds to deconstruct the functioning and purpose of the preface and its role in a book. Derrida also included introductions in this section so we have reworded this quote to reflect this instance.
References
Adorno, T. W. (1991). In J. M. Bernstein (Ed.), The culture industry: Selected essays on mass culture. London/New York: Routledge.
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity. Human Relations, 65(3), 367–390.
Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and poststructural approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Blackmore, J. (1999). Troubling women: Feminism, leadership and educational change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Blackmore, J. (2017). Educational leadership and Nancy Fraser. London: Routledge.
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.
Cherryholmes, C. H. (1988). Power and criticism: Poststructural investigations in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2013). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. London/New York: Verso Books.
Davies, B. (1993). Poststructuralist theory and classroom practice. Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Derrida, J. (1981). Dissemination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eacott, S. (2015). Educational leadership relationally: A theory and methodology for educational leadership, management and administration. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
English, F. W. (2002). The point of scientificity, the fall of the epistemological dominos, and the end of the field of educational administration. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21, 109–136.
English, F. W. (2003). The postmodern challenge to the practice of educational administration. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publishing Ltd.
Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (2013). Methodological individualism, educational administration and leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(2), 159–173.
Fitzgerald, T. (2003a). Interrogating orthodox voices: Gender, ethnicity and educational leadership. School Leadership & Management, 23(4), 431–444.
Fitzgerald, T. (2003b). Changing the deafening silence of indigenous women’s voices in educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(1), 9–23.
Foucault, M. (1977). What is an author? In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault (pp. 113–138). New York: Cornell University Press.
Foucault, M. (2000). Polemics, politics and problematizations. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Ethics, essential works of Foucault 1954–1984: Volume 1 (pp. 111–119). London: Penguin Books.
Gillies, D. (2013). Michel Foucault and educational leadership. London: Routledge.
Gowlett, C. (2013). Deterritorialising the dominant assemblage of social justice research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(1), 145–154.
Gowlett, C., & Rasmussen, M. L. (2014). The cultural politics of queer theory in education research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(3), 331–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.888838
Gowlett, C., & Rasmussen, M. L. (Eds.). (2016). The cultural politics of queer theory in education research. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Gronn, P. (2003). Leadership: Who needs it? School Leadership and Management, 23(3), 267–290.
Gunter, H. (2001). Leaders and leadership in education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Gunter, H. (2010). A sociological approach to educational leadership. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(4), 519–527.
Gunter, H. (2012). Leadership and the reform of education. Bristol: Policy Press.
Gunter, H. (2013). Educational leadership and Hannah Arendt. London: Routledge.
Gunter, H. (2016). An intellectual history of school leadership practice and research. London: Bloomsbury.
Gunter, H., & Ribbins, P. (2002). Leadership studies in education: Towards a map of the field. Educational Management and Administration, 30(4), 387–416.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (9th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research. London/New York: Routledge.
Kellerman, B. (2012). The end of leadership. New York: HarperCollins.
Lakomski, G. (2005). Managing without leadership: Towards a theory of organizational functioning. London: Elsevier.
Lakomski, G., Eacott, S., & Evers, C. W. (Eds.). (2017). Questioning leadership: New directions for educational organisations. London: Routledge.
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). Driftworks. New York: Semiotext(e).
Lyotard, J. F. (1988). The differend: Phrases in dispute. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Maxcy, S. (1991). Educational leadership: A critical pragmatic perspective. New York: Bergin and Garvey.
Maxcy, S. (Ed.). (1994). Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Niesche, R. (2011). Foucault and educational leadership: Disciplining the principal. London: Routledge.
Niesche, R. (2013). Deconstructing educational leadership: Derrida and Lyotard. London: Routledge.
Niesche, R. (2018). Critical perspectives in educational leadership: A new ‘theory turn’? Journal of Educational Administration and History, 50, 145–158.
Niesche, R., & Gowlett, C. (2015). Advocating a post-structuralist politics for educational leadership. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(4), 372–386.
Niesche, R., & Keddie, A. (2016). Leadership, ethics and schooling for social justice. London: Routledge.
Parkes, R. J., Gore, J. M., & Elsworth, W. (2010). After poststructuralism: Rethinking the discourse of social justice pedagogy. In T. Chapman & N. Hobbel (Eds.), Language, culture and teaching: Social justice pedagogy across the curriculum (pp. 164–182). London: Routledge.
Peters, M. A. (Ed.). (1998). Naming the multiple: Poststructuralism and education. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
Peters, M. A., & Burbles, N. C. (2004). Poststructuralism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Stiegler, B. (2010). Taking care of youth and the generations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Stiegler, B. (2011). The decadence of industrial democracies: Disbelief and discredit, volume 1. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Stiegler, B. (2015). States of shock: Stupidity and knowledge in the 21st century. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Thomson, P. (2017). Educational leadership and Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.
Thrupp, M. (2003). The school leadership literature in managerialist times: Exploring the problem of textual apologism. School Leadership and Management, 23(2), 149–172.
Usher, R., & Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and education. London/New York: Routledge.
Wilkinson, J. (2008). Good intentions are not enough: A critical examination of diversity and educational leadership scholarship. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 40(2), 101–112.
Youdell, D. (2011). School trouble: Identity, power and politics in education. London/New York: Routledge.
Zhao, Y. (2018). What works may hurt: Side effects in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Niesche, R., Gowlett, C. (2019). Why Use Social, Critical and Political Theories in Educational Leadership?. In: Social, Critical and Political Theories for Educational Leadership. Educational Leadership Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8241-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8241-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8240-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8241-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)