Abstract
Complex civil litigation, such as private monopolization and patent infringement, often involves monetary remedies that must be quantified. This chapter analyzes a Tokyo High Court case decision on damages calculation in the private monopolization of Nipro Corporation (Nipro).
This Chapter is based on Koki Arai (2014) “Damage Calculation in Private Monopolization: A Case Study in Japan. “Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 10 (2), 505–516.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
see Zitzewitz (2012).
- 2.
see Ireland (1997).
- 3.
see Gregory Sidak (2013).
- 4.
see Gavil (2000).
- 5.
see Wright (2012).
- 6.
see Davis and Garces (2009).
- 7.
see Maier-Rigaud and Schwalbe (2013).
- 8.
see Walle (2013).
- 9.
see Porter (1983).
- 10.
see Arai (2013).
- 11.
see Miwa and Mark Ramsever (2013).
- 12.
see Miwa and Mark Ramsever (2005).
References
Arai K (2013) Cartel identification by price analysis at the Asian meeting of the econometric society
Davis P, Garces E (2009) Quantitative techniques for competition and antitrust analysis. Princeton Univ. Press
Gavil AI (2000) Defining reliable forensic economics in the Post-Daubert/Kumho tire era: case studies from antitrust. Wash Lee L Rev 57: 831
Gregory Sidak J (2013) Court-appointed neutral economic experts. J Compet Law Econ 9: 359
Ireland TR (1997) The Daubert decision and forensic economics. J Forensic Econ 10:121
Maier-Rigaud F, Schwalbe U (2013) Quantification of antitrust damages. IESEG working paper series, 2013-EOC-09. http://www.ieseg.fr/wp-content/uploads/2013-ECO-09_Maier-Rigaud.pdf
Miwa Y, Mark Ramsever J (2005) Toward a theory of jurisdictional competition: the case of the Japanese FTC. J Compet Law Econ 1:247
Miwa Y, Mark Ramsever J (2013) Naigai/Nipro Songai Baisho Seikyu Jiken ni miru “Shiteki Dokusen” Kinshi Kitei no Houteki Yu-ko-sei [Legal effectiveness on the article of prohibition of “Private Monopolization” in the damages lawsuit of Naigai/Nipro]. Law Tech 1:60
Porter R (1983) A study of cartel stability: the joint executive committee, 1880–1886. Bell J Econ 14:301
Walle SV (2013) Private antitrust litigation in the European Union and Japan: a comparative perspective. Maklu Publishers
Wright J (2012) Abandoning antitrust’s Chicago obsession: the case for evidence-based antitrust. Antitrust L J 78:241
Zitzewitz E (2012) Forensic economics. J Econ Lit 50:731
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arai, K. (2019). Damages Calculations in Private Monopolization. In: Law and Economics in Japanese Competition Policy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8188-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8188-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8187-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8188-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)