Applications of GIS in Management of Water Resources to Attain Zero Hunger

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 39)


The sustainable development goals as proposed by United Nations give huge importance to ending hunger and attaining food security for all by 2030. According to World Health Organization (WHO), food security can be achieved if everyone has access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food throughout the year. Every one in nine persons is deprived of sufficient and safe food. To meet the growing population demand, United Nations aims to double the productivity in agriculture by 2030. Though, by 2015 there is around 10% reduction in critically hungry population of world, yet, the food security for all is a far-sighted dream. Crunch of land and water resources is posing the biggest threat in meeting this target. Per capita availability of land has been decreased with the increase in population, and the water resources are either unavailable or polluted. For sustainable agriculture, there is a need to identify and map locations having adequate water and land resources. GIS models help in analyzing ground profiles, soil water content, rainfall patterns, and geographical terrain and crop conditions. Thus, GIS technologies can help in developing models for water resource management. Continuous monitoring and assessment of natural water resources can help in capacity building, mapping and/or monitoring of cultivable land. Advances in GIS technologies could be an efficient tool to achieve the “zero hunger” goal. The present chapter covers various developments in GIS for water resource modeling across the globe.


Resource management Water resource Food security Remote sensing Hydrology 


  1. 1.
    Bruinsma J (2009) The resources outlook: by how much do land, water and crop yields need to increase by 2050? In: Looking ahead in world food and agriculture: perspectives to 2050. FAO, Rome, pp 233–278. Retrieved from
  2. 2.
    Chen Z, Grasby S, Osadetz MK (2002) Prediction of average annual groundwater levels from climate variables: an empirical model. J Hydrol 260:102–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chowdary VM, Ramakrishnan D, Srivastava YK, Chandran V, Jeyaram A (2009) Integrated water resource development plan for sustainable management of Mayurakshi watershed, India using remote sensing and GIS. Water Resour Manage 23(8):1581–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Deus LAB, de Britto FGA, dos Santos CSM, de Melo França CASS, Andrade CD, Ferreira VJRP, de Berrêdo Viana D, de Freitas MAV (2016) GeoAmazonas—GIS for water resources management. J Geogr Inf Syst 8:558–577Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    du Plessis Anja (2017) Freshwater challenges of south africa and its upper vaal river: current state and outlook. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jaiswal RK, Mukherjee S, Krishnamurthy J, Saxena R (2003) Role of remote sensing and GIS techniques for generation of groundwater prospect zones towards rural development-an approach. Int J Remote Sens 24(5):993–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kalogirou S (2002) Expert systems and GIS: an application of land suitability evaluation. Comput Environ Urban Syst 26(2–3):89–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kløve B, Ala-Aho P, Bertrand G, Gurdak JJ, Kupfersberger H, Kværner J, Muotka T, Mykrä H, Preda E, Rossi P, Uvo CB, Velasco E, Pulido-Velazquez, M (2014) Climate change impacts on groundwater and dependent ecosystems. J Hydrol 518:250–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lokesh N, Gopalakrishna GS, Mahesh MJ (2007) Hydrogeomorphological studies in Kallambella watershed, Tumkur district, Karnataka State, India using remote sensing techniques and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 35(1):97–105Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mattikalli NM, Richards KS (1996) Estimation of surface water quality changes in response to land use change: application of the export coefficient model using remote sensing and geographical information system. J Environ Manage 48(3):263–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murthy KSR (2000) Groundwater potential in a semi-arid region of Andhra Pradesh: a geographical information system approach. Int J Remote Sens 21(9):1867–1884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Obi Reddy GP, Chandra Mouli K, Srivastav SK, Srinivas CV, Maji AK (2000) Evaluation of groundwater potential zones using remote sensing data—a case study of Gaimukh watershed, Bhandara district, Maharashtra. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 28(1):19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pratap K, Ravindran KV, Prabakaran B (2000) Groundwater prospect zoning using remote sensing and geographical information system: a case study in Dala-Renukoot area, Sonbhadra district Uttar Pradesh. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 28(4):249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rao YS, Jugran DK (2003) Delineation of groundwater potential zones and zones of groundwater quality suitable for domestic purposes using remote sensing and GIS. Hydrol Sci J 48(5):821–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saraf AK, Choudhury PR (1998) Integrated remote sensing and GIS for groundwater exploration and identification of artificial recharge sites. Int J Remote Sens 19(10):1825–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh AK, Prakash SR (2003) An integrated approach of remote sensing, geophysics and GIS to evaluation of groundwater potentiality of Ojhala sub watershed, Mirzapur District, U. P. India.
  17. 17.
    Singh AK, Panda SN, Kumar KS (2013) Artificial groundwater recharge zones mapping using remote sensing and GIS: a case study in Indian Punjab. Environ Earth Sci 62(4):871–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tiwari AK, De Maio M, Singh PK, Mahato MK (2015) Evaluation of surface water quality by using GIS and a heavy metal pollution index (HPI) model in a coal mining area, India. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 95(3):304–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tong ST, Chen W (2002) Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality. J Environ Manage 66(4):377–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van der Kamp G, Maathuis H (1991) Annual fluctuations of groundwater levels as a result of loading by surface moisture. J Hydrol 127:137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Verro R, Calliera M, Maffioli G, Auteri D, Sala S, Finizio A, Vighi, M (2002) GIS-based system for surface water risk assessment of agricultural chemicals. 1. Methodological approach. Environ Sci Technol 36(7):1532–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    World Bank (2018) Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters), FAO AQUASTAT DATA. Retrieved from:

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringChandigarh UniversityGharuan, MohaliIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiologySD College BarnalaBarnalaIndia
  3. 3.Amity UniversityNoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations