Skip to main content

Towards Inclusive Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Perspectives, Challenges, and Opportunities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Artificial Intelligence and Inclusive Education

Abstract

In the West and other parts of the world, the ideal of an individualised, personalised education system has become ever more influential in recent times. Over the last 30 years, research has shown how effective, individually tailored approaches can be achieved using artificial intelligence techniques and intelligent learning environments (ILE). As new audiences of learners are exposed daily to ILEs through mobile devices and ubiquitous Internet access, significantly different challenges to the original goal of personalised instruction are presented. In particular, learners have cultural backgrounds and preferences that may not align with most mainstream educational systems. When faced with practical cultural issues, the transfer of successful research and ILEs to underserved contexts has been naturally quite low. This chapter first takes a step back and analyses perspectives on how intelligent learning environments have transitioned from focusing on instructional rigour to focusing more deeply on the learner. Next, it examines some major challenges faced when ILEs aim to integrate culturally sensitive design features. The chapter then discusses several opportunities for dealing with these challenges from novel perspectives such as teacher modelling, the use of educational robots and empathic systems and highlights important concerns such as machine ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://luxai.com/.

  2. 2.

    http://moralmachine.mit.edu/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.ethicsnet.com/.

References

  • Alavi, H. S., & Dillenbourg, P. (2012). An ambient awareness tool for supporting supervised collaborative problem solving. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 5(3), 264–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. E. (1991). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allessio, D., Woolf, B., Wixon, N., et al. (2018). Ella me ayudó (she helped me): Supporting Hispanic and English language learners in a Math ITS. In C. Penstein Rosé, et al. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 10948, Artificial intelligence in education. AIED 2018. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • English Oxford Living Dictionaries (2018). Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/artificial_intelligence.

  • Aylett, R., Paiva, A., Vannini, N., et al. (2009). But that was in another country: Agents and intercultural empathy. In: K. S. Decker, J. S. Sichman, C. Sierra, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, Budapest, Hungary, 10–15 May 2009 (pp. 329–336). Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. S. (2016). Stupid tutoring systems, intelligent humans. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 600–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. J. (1986). A development approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (2018). This happy robot helps kids with autism, Techcrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2018/08/13/this-happy-robot-helps-kids-with-autism/. Accessed October 22, 2018.

  • Blanchard, E. G. (2012). Is it adequate to model the socio-cultural dimension of e-learners by informing a fixed set of personal criteria? In 12th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), USA (pp. 388–392).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E. G. (2015). Socio-cultural imbalances in AIED research: Investigations, implications and opportunities. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 25(2), 204–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E. G., & Ogan, A. (2010). Infusing cultural awareness into intelligent tutoring systems for a globalized world. In Advances in intelligent tutoring systems, SCI 308 (pp. 485–505). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E. G., & Mizoguchi, R. (2014). Designing culturally-aware tutoring systems with MAUOC, the more advanced upper ontology of culture. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(1), 41–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E. G., Karanasios, S., & Dimitrova, V. (2013). A conceptual model of intercultural communication: Challenges, development method and achievements. In E. G. Blanchard & I. Gasparini (Eds.), 4th International Workshop on Culturally-Aware Tutoring Systems (CATS)—AIED 2013 Workshops Proceedings (Vol. 5, pp. 1–10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgadus Cortez, M. (2017). AI in education will grow exponentially by 2021. Edtech, Focus on K-12. https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2017/07/ai-education-will-grow-exponentially-2021. Accessed October 22, 2018.

  • Bray, B. A., & McClaskey, K. A. (2016). How to personalize learning: A practical guide for getting started and going deeper. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brusilovsky, P. (1994). Student model centered architecture for intelligent learning environments. In Proceeding of 4th International Conference on User Modeling, Hyannis, MA, USA, August 15–19, 1994 (pp. 31–36). http://www.pitt.edu/~peterb/papers/UM94.html.

  • Cambridge advanced learner’s dictionary. (2003). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, J. (2009). Social practice: Becoming enculturated in human-computer interaction. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 5616, Proceeding of 5th International Conference on Universal Access in HCI, San Diego, CA, USA, July 19–24, 2009 (pp. 303–313). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellano, G., Paiva, A., Kappas, A., et al. (2013). Towards empathic virtual and robotic tutors. In H. C. Lane, K. Yacef, J. Mostow, et al. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 7926, Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~ruth/Papers/planning/AIED13-EMOTE-sub.pdf.

  • Chandramouli, K., Stewart, C., Brailsford, T., et al. (2008). CAE-L: An ontology modelling cultural behaviour in adaptive education. In P. Mylonas, M. Wallace, & M. Angelides (Eds.), 3rd International Workshop on Semantic Media Adaptation and Personalization (pp. 183–188). Washington, USA: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • De-Arteaga, M., Herlands, W., Neill, D. B., et al. (2018). Machine learning for the developing world. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 9(2), Article 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, M., & Warmelink, H. (2017). OASISTAN: An intercultural role-playing simulation game to recognize cultural dimensions. Simulation & Gaming, 48(2), 178–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dial, M. (2018). Heartificial empathy: Putting heart into business and artificial intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2016). The evolution of research on digital education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 544–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, P. J., Blanchard, N., Samei, B., et al. (2016). Automatic teacher modeling from live classroom audio. In Proceedings of 24th ACM International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP) (pp. 45–53). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druga, S. (2018). The story of Cognimates. In Proceedings of 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC), Trondheim, Norway, June 19–22, 2018. New York, USA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druga, S., Williams, R., Breazeal, C., et al. (2017). Hey Google is it OK if I eat you? Initial explorations in child-agent interaction. In 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Stanford, California, USA, June 27–30, 2017 (pp. 595–600). ACM. http://robotic.media.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2017/06/idcwp0180-drugaACR.pdf.

  • DuBoulay, B., Avramides, K. A., Luckin, R., et al. (2010). Towards systems that care: A conceptual framework based on motivation, metacognition and affect. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 20(3), 197–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Empathy. (2018). https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/empathy. Accessed October 22, 2018.

  • Endrass, B., André, E., & Rehm, M. (2011). Towards culturally-aware virtual agent systems. In E. G. Blanchard & D. Allard (Eds.), The handbook of research on culturally-aware information technology: Perspectives and models (pp. 412–428). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, B. (2014). Learning from the intersection of education and technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., Yarzebinski, E., Vaughn, C., Ogan, A., & Cassell, J. (2013). The effects of culturally congruent educational technologies on student achievement. In H. C. Lane, K. Yacef, J. Mostow, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED, Memphis (pp. 493–502). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finland schools are testing out robot teachers. (2018). https://nypost.com/2018/03/27/finland-schools-are-testing-out-robot-teachers/. Accessed October 22, 2018.

  • Gasparini, I., Pimenta, M. S., & Moreira de Oliveira, J. P. (2011). How to apply context awareness in an adaptive e-learning environment to improve personalization capabilities? In G. Acuña, J. A. Baier (Eds.), Proceedings of 30th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Society, SCCC, Curico, Chile, November 9–11, 2011 (pp. 161–170). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand Challenges—Advanced Personalised Learning. (2018). http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges/learning.aspx. Accessed October 22, 2018.

  • Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, Y. (2018). Gaze feedback and pedagogical suggestions in collaborative learning investigation of explanation performance on self’s concept in a knowledge integration task. In C. Rosé, R. Martínez-Maldonado, H. U. Hoppe, et al. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence: Vol. 10947, Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) (pp. 78–87). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, N., & Heffernan, C. (2014). The ASSISTments ecosystem: Building a platform that brings scientists and teachers together for minimally invasive research on human learning and teaching. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 470–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., & Rudolph, S. (2010). Foundations of semantic web technologies. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, K., McLaren, B., & Aleven, V. (2018). Student learning benefits of a mixed-reality teacher awareness tool in AI-enhanced classrooms. In C. Rosé, R. Martínez-Maldonado, H. U. Hoppe, et al. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence: Vol. 10947, Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) (pp. 154–168). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICT Facts and Figures. (2017). https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2017.pdf. Accessed October 22, 2018.

  • Janakiram, M. S. V. (2018). https://www.forbes.com/sites/janakirammsv/2018/04/02/nvidia-pushes-its-gpu-technology-to-the-front-and-center-of-artificial-intelligence/#173c7a32abc9. Accessed October 22, 2018.

  • Johnson, S. (1979). A dictionary of the english language (Vol. 1). London: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. L., & Lester, J. C. (2016). Face-to-Face interaction with pedagogical agents, twenty years later. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. L., Beal, C., Fowles-Winkler, A., et al. (2004). Tactical language training system: An interim report. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 3220, 7th International conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil, August 30–September 3, 2004 (pp. 336–345). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, P. H. Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., et al. (2012). Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 303. https://depts.washington.edu/hints/publications/Robovie_Closet_Study_Developmental_Psych_2012.pdf. Accessed October 22, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J., & McCalla, G. (2003). The careful double vision of self. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugrin, B., Frommel, J., & Andre, E. (2018). Combining a data-driven and theory-based approach to generate culture-dependent behaviours for virtual characters. In C. Faucher (Ed.), Intelligent Systems Reference Library: Vol. 134, Advances in culturally-aware intelligent systems and in cross-cultural psychological studies (pp. 111–142). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenas, S., Degens, N., Paiva, A., et al. (2016). Modeling culture in intelligent virtual agents from theory to implementation. Autonomous Agent Multi-Agent Systems, 30, 931–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrikis, M., Holme, W., Zhang, J., et al. (2018). Fractions lab goes east: Learning and interaction with an exploratory learning environment in China. In C. Rosé, R. Martínez-Maldonado, H. U. Hoppe, et al. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence: Vol. 10947, Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) (pp. 209–214). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, C., & Oliver, R. (2000). Designing learning environments for cultural inclusivity: A case study of indigenous online learning at tertiary level. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 58–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melis, E., Goguadze, G., Libbrecht, P., et al. (2011). Culturally-aware mathematics education technology. In E. G. Blanchard & D. Allard (Eds.), The handbook of research on culturally-aware information technology: Perspectives and models (pp. 543–557). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster Inc. (1983). Webster’s ninth new collegiate dictionary. MA: Springfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizoguchi, R., & Bourdeaux, J. (2016). Using ontological engineering to overcome AI-ED problems: Contribution, impact and perspectives. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, P. S. (2017). Dynamic cultural contextualisation of intelligent learning environments (Ph.D. thesis). The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, P. S. (2018). Ontological support for the cultural contextualisation of intelligent learning environments for inclusive education. Paper presented at the international workshop on context and culture in intelligent tutoring systems at intelligent tutoring systems, Montreal, Canada, June 12, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, P., & Mohan, P. (2013). Contextualised student modelling for enculturated systems. In E. G. Blanchard, I. Gasparini (Eds.), 4th International Workshop on Culturally-Aware Tutoring Systems (CATS)—AIED 2013 Workshops Proceedings (Vol. 5, pp. 20–29).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, P., & Mohan, P. (2015). Dynamic cultural contextualisation of educational content in intelligent learning environments using ICON. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 25(2), 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nouri, E., Georgila, K., & Traum, D. (2017). Culture-specific models of negotiation for virtual characters: Multi-attribute decision-making based on culture-specific values. Culture AI & Society, 32(1), 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, B. D. (2015). Intelligent tutoring systems by and for the developing world: A review of trends and approaches for educational technology in a global context. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 25(2), 177–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogan, A., Walker, E., Baker, R., et al. (2015a). Towards understanding how to assess help-seeking behaviour across cultures. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 25, 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogan, A., Yarzebinski, E., Fernández, P., et al. (2015b). Cognitive tutor use in Chile: Understanding classroom and lab culture. In C. Conati, et al. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence: Vol. 9112, Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) (pp. 318–327). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham, P., & Wang, J. (2018). Predicting learners’ emotions in mobile MOOC learning via a multimodal intelligent tutor. In C. Rosé, R. Martínez-Maldonado, H. U. Hoppe, et al. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence: Vol. 10947, Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) (pp. 150–159). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkwart, N. (2016). Another 25 years of AIED? Challenges and opportunities for intelligent educational technologies of the future. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 771–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehm, M. (2010). Developing enculturated agents: Pitfalls and strategies. In E. G. Blanchard & D. Allard (Eds.), The handbook of research on culturally-aware information technology: Perspectives and models (pp. 362–386). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehm, M. (2018). Affective body movements (for robots) across cultures. In C. Faucher (Ed.), Intelligent Systems Reference Library: Vol. 134, Advances in culturally-aware intelligent systems and in cross-cultural psychological studies (pp 165–188). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehm, M., Andre, E., Nakano, Y., et al. (2007). The CUBE-G approach—Coaching culture-specific nonverbal behavior by virtual agents. In: I. Mayer & H. Mastik (Eds.), ISAGA 2007: Organizing and learning through gaming and simulation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, R. A. (2015). MOOCS, high technology and higher learning. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rise of the robots: Mady Delvaux on why their use should be regulated, EU Parliament. (2017). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/economy/20170109STO57505/rise-of-the-robots-mady-delvaux-on-why-their-use-should-be-regulated. Accessed October 22, 2018.

  • Robbins, C. (2006). Providing cultural context with educational multimedia in the South Pacific. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 202–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 582–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosé, C. P., & Ferschke, O. (2016). Technology support for discussion based learning: From computer supported collaborative learning to the future of massive open online courses. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 660–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudovic, O., Utsumi, Y., Lee, J., et al. (2018). CultureNet: A deep learning approach for engagement intensity estimation from face images of children with autism. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Madrid, Spain, October 1–5, 2018. IEEE Xplore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savard, I., & Mizoguchi, R. (2016). Ontology of culture: A procedural approach for cultural adaptation in ITSs. In W. Chen, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Computers in Education. India: Asia Pacific Society for Computers in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, D. (2018). By the numbers: MOOCS in 2017. https://www.class-central.com/report/mooc-stats-2017/. Accessed October 22, 2018.

  • Sharifian, F. (2003). On cultural conceptualisations. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3(3), 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Six key benefits of adaptive learning. (2013). http://www.dreambox.com/blog/six-benefits-of-adaptive-learning. Accessed October 22, 2018.

  • Thakker, D., Karanasios, S., Blanchard, E., et al. (2017). Ontology for cultural variations in interpersonal communication: Building on theoretical models and crowdsourced knowledge. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(6), 1411–1428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The IEEE global initiative on ethics of autonomous and intelligent systems. Affective computing. (2018). https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-standards/standards/web/documents/other/ead_affective_computing_v2.pdf. Accessed October 22, 2018.

  • The US National Academy of Engineering. (2018). https://www.scientia.global/the-usnational-academy-of-engineering/. Accessed October 22, 2018.

  • Tims, M. J. (2016). Letting artificial intelligence in education out of the box: Educational cobots and smart classrooms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 701–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1997). Riding the waves of culture. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchidiuno, J., Yarzebinski, E., Madaio, M., et al. (2018). Designing appropriate learning technologies for school versus home settings in Tanzanian rural villages. In Proceedings of 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies, Menlo Park and San Jose, CA, USA, June 20–22, 2018. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartak, M. P., Almeida, S. F., & Heffernan, N. T. (2008). Extending ITS authoring tools to be culturally-aware. In E. G. Blanchard & D. Allard (Eds.), Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Culturally-Aware Tutoring Systems (CATS 2008)—ITS 2008 Workshops Proceeding, Montreal, Canada, June 23–27, 2008 (pp. 101–105).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. (2018). AI robots are transforming parenting in China, CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/28/health/china-ai-early-education/index.html. Accessed 22 Oct 2018.

  • Wang, N., Shapiro, A., Feng, A., et al. (2018). Learning by explaining to a digital doppelganger. In R. Nkambou, R. Azevedo, & J. Vassileva (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 10858, Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 256–264). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R., Vazquez, C., Druga, S., et al. (2018). My doll says it’s OK: Voice-enabled toy influences children’s moral decisions. In Proceedings of 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Trondheim, Norway, June 19–22, 2018 (pp. 625–631). New York: USA, ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodie, A. (2018). https://www.datanami.com/2018/03/13/jeff-dean-thinks-ai-can-solve-grand-challenges-heres-how/. Accessed October 22, 2018.

  • Woolf, B. P. (2009). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadollahi, E., Johal, W., Paiva, A., et al. (2018). When deictic gestures in a robot can harm child-robot collaboration. In Proceedings of 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Trondheim, Norway, June 19–22, 2018 (pp. 195–206). New York: USA, ACM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phaedra S. Mohammed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mohammed, P.S., ‘Nell’ Watson, E. (2019). Towards Inclusive Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Perspectives, Challenges, and Opportunities. In: Knox, J., Wang, Y., Gallagher, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Inclusive Education. Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8161-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8161-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8160-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8161-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics