Advertisement

A Study on Gaming of Participatory Evacuation Planning in Tourist Areas Using Agent Simulation

Chapter
  • 397 Downloads
Part of the Translational Systems Sciences book series (TSS, volume 18)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to show the effectiveness of a gaming of participatory evacuation planning in tourist areas using agent simulation from the viewpoint of legitimate peripheral participation. This study conducted an experiment of the gaming to take a pre- and post-questionnaire survey of 32 students. We got two findings including two of the central components of legitimate peripheral participation. First, this gaming using agent simulation can function as a practical disaster prevention activity. Second, participants can join this gaming from their standpoint without special knowledge and skills. This study confirms that this gaming using agent simulation can facilitate collaboration between researchers and members of the public, which is an essential component of community disaster prevention.

Keywords

Gaming Evacuation planning Participatory Tourist area Agent simulation Earthquake 

References

  1. 1.
    Yamori K (2013) Improving disaster risk communication: a paradigm shift in disaster information research, 2nd edn. Minerva Publishing, Kyoto (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sakai K, Honda A, Mongkonkerd S et al (2014) A study on evacuation simulation for guiding tourists in Himeji Castle based on a survey of tourists’ intentions in evacuation after earthquake. ASEAN J Hosp Tour 13:137–150Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sugiyama T, Okubo T, Kim D, Hayashi M (2015) Study of the evacuation plan for the concerning stranded tourists on arounded area of Kiyomizu Temple, Kyoto. J Disaster Mitig Hist Cities 9:127–134Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Futagami T, Akizuki K, Matsuyama Y, Kunikata Y (2013) Development of the vulnerable people supporting system for a tsunami refuge area. J Japan Soc Civil Eng Ser F6 (Saf Probl) 69:I_1–I_6.  https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejsp.69.I_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gotoh H, Harada E, Maruyama Y et al (2008) Contribution of crowd refuge simulator to town planning against tsunami flood. Proc Coast Eng JSCE 55:1371–1375.  https://doi.org/10.2208/proce1989.55.1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hatayama M, Nakai F, Yamori K (2014) Tsunami evacuation evaluation system for plan development of community based evacuation. IPSJ J 55:1498–1508. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Takayanagi H, Kurita Y, Yamada S, Kimura T (2014) A study on regional urban disaster prevention plans of Otsu City, Shiga prefecture by using of evacuation simulation and multi-agent pedestrian model. AIJ J Technol Des 20:1091–1094.  https://doi.org/10.3130/aijt.20.1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katada T, Kuwasawa N, Kanai M, Hosoi K (2004) Disaster education for Owase citizen by using Tsunami scenario simulator and evaluation of that method. For Soc 2:199–208.  https://doi.org/10.3392/sociotechnica.2.199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuwasawa N, Hosoi K, Katada T (2015) Study on proper location in consideration of guidance effect of tsunami shelter. J Japan Soc Civil Eng Ser D3 (Infrastruct Plan Manag) 71:117–126.  https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejipm.71.117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kawashima K, Tatano H, Hatayama M (2006) A flood risk communication support system to promote safe autonomous evacuation. Infrastruct Plan Rev 23:309–318.  https://doi.org/10.2208/journalip.23.309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakai F, Hatayama M, Yamoori Y (2013) Construction of tsunami evacuation evaluation system for support to make evacuation planning. IPSJ SIG Notes 2013:1–8Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tanuma H, Deguchi H (2007) Development of agent-based social simulation language: SOARS. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 90:2415–2422Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sakai K, Honda A, Monkonkerd S et al (2014) A study on evacuation behavior pattern of tourists after earthquake in Himeji Castle: a survey of consciousness based on multi criteria decision making. J Disaster Mitig Hist Cities 8(1):89–194Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Open Innovation & Collaboration Research OrganizationRitsumeikan UniversityIbarakiJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Policy ScienceRitsumeikan UniversityIbarakiJapan
  3. 3.College of Policy ScienceRitsumeikan UniversityIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations