Skip to main content

Disrupting Traditional Business Studies Testing by Internet-Based Simulation Game

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 18))

Abstract

Simulation has become a very popular teaching tool in business studies. However, there are few previous studies that have investigated its uses as a testing tool in the area. This study aims to investigate its validity as a testing tool and the possible biases that can occur. Data was obtained from 259 MBA students from Thammasat Business School. The results showed that there is a positive correlation between simulation game scores and students’ GPA, their grades in each subject, and students’ perception of their abilities. Therefore, its validity is arguably confirmed. Further investigation revealed that there is no statistical differences between the simulation game scores among different organizations where students work, different sectors of their organization, or the different positions in an organization. Nevertheless, some differences in simulation game scores were found among the different areas of specialization and the ages of students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson C (2008) Simulation game playing – a nursing instructional strategy. Clin Simul Nurs 4(1):7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oţoiu C, Oţoiu G (2012) Testing a simulation game as a potential teaching method for a master’s course in human resources management. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 33:845–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hauge J, Riedel J (2012) Evaluation of simulation games for teaching engineering and manufacturing. Procedia Comput Sci 15:210–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reise C, Müller B, Seliger G (2014) Resource efficiency learning game – electric scooter game. Procedia CIRP 15:355–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Randel J, Morris B, Wetzel C, Whitehill B (1992) The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: a review of recent research. Simul Gaming 25:261–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sitzmann T (2011) A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Pers Psychol 64:489–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Driskell J, Dwyer D (1984) Microcomputer videogame based training. Educ Technol 24:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gredler M (1996) Educational games and simulations: a technology in search of a research paradigm. In: Jonassen DH (ed) Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tobias S, Fletcher J (2007) What research has to say about designing computer games for learning. Educ Technol 47:20–29

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vogel J, Vogel D, Cannon-Bowers J, Bowers C, Muse K, Wright M (2006) Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: a meta-analysis. J Educ Comput Res 34:229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Romme AG, Micro worlds for management: education and learning. www.unice.fr/sg/resourcesindex/html. Last visited on 2018/01/05

  12. Hyman R (1974) Ways of teaching. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  13. Malone TW (1981) Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cogn Sci 4:333–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruner J (1962) On knowing: essays for the left hand. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Piaget J (1951) Psychology of intelligence. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garris R, Ahlers R, Driskell JE (2002) Games, motivation, and learning: a research and practice model. Simul Gaming 33:441–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tennyson RD, Jorczak RL (2008) A conceptual framework for the empirical study of instructional games. In: O’Neil HF, Perez RS (eds) Computer games and team and individual learning. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 39–54

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bell BS, Kanar AM, Kozlowski SWJ (2008) Current issues and future directions in simulation-based training in North America. Int J Hum Resour Manag 19:1416–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Frese M, Brodbeck FC, Heinbokel T, Mooser C, Schleiffenbaum E, Thiemann P (1991) Errors in training computer skills: on the positive function of errors. Hum Comput Interact 6:77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Neil HF, Wainess R, Baker EL (2005) Classification of learning outcomes: evidence from the computer games literature. Curric J 16:455–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Prensky M (2001) Digital game-based learning. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bell BS, Kozlowski SWJ (2008) Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. J Appl Psychol 93:296–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Federation of American Scientists (2006) Summit on educational games: harnessing the power of video games for learning, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  25. North MM, Sessum J, Zakalev A (2003) Immersive visualization tool for pedagogical practices of computer science concepts, a pilot study. JCSC 19:207–215

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shute VJ, Glaser R (1990) A large-scale evaluation of an intelligent discovery world: Smithtown. Interact Learn Environ 1:51–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Taylor RS, Chi MTH (2006) Simulation versus text: acquisition of implicit and explicit information. J Educ Comput Res 35:289–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nopadol Rompho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pattamaroj, K., Rompho, N. (2019). Disrupting Traditional Business Studies Testing by Internet-Based Simulation Game. In: Hamada, R., et al. Neo-Simulation and Gaming Toward Active Learning. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 18. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8039-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8039-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8038-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8039-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics