Skip to main content

Confucian Self-cultivation and the Paradox of Moral Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Moral Education and the Ethics of Self-Cultivation

Abstract

Self-cultivation 修其身 (xiu qishen) is a perennial concern in Confucianism. All Confucian scholars affirm the primacy of self-cultivation although they differ in their specific formulations and recommended ways to achieve it. In this chapter, I examine and compare the educational thought of two eminent Confucian philosophers: Mencius (Mengzi) 孟子 (372–289 B.C.E.) and Xunzi 荀子 (310–235 B.C.E). These two philosophers are the two foremost thinkers after Confucius in classical/early Confucianism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ames, R. T., & Hall, D. L. (2001). Focusing the familiar: A translation and philosophical interpretation of the Zhongyong. University of Hawai'i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, G. A. (1983). Does the need for socialisation in morality imply that we must indoctrinate? In Philosophy of education: Proceedings of the Thirty-ninth annual meeting of the philosophy of education society in normal, IL, 1983, by the Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (1991). Educating the virtues. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, W. -C. (2014). Philosophical thought of Mencius. In V. Shen (Ed.), Dao companion to classical Confucian philosophy. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, V. M. Y. (2004). Progress from traditional to creativity education in Chinese societies. In S. Lau, A. N. N. Hui, & G. Y. C. Ng (Eds.), Creativity: When east meets west. World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C. -Y. (2014). Xunzi as a systematic philosopher: Towards organic unity of nature, mind and reason. In V. Shen (Ed.), Dao companion to classical Confucian philosophy. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuypers, S. (2009). Educating for authenticity: The paradox of moral education revisited. In S. Cuypers & H. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of education. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. (1989). Neutrality in education. In R. E. Goodin & A. Reeve (Eds.), Liberal neutrality. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, D. K. (2007). The four books: The basic teachings of the later Confucian tradition. Hackett Publishing Co Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giarelli, J. (1981). R.M. Hare’s Universal prescriptivism and moral education: A critique. In Philosophy of education: Proceedings of the thirty-seventh annual meeting of the philosophy of education society in normal, IL, 1981, by the Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. L., & Ames, R. T. (1987). Thinking through confucius. Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, L. H., & Ames, R. T. (1998). Thinking from the Han: Self, truth, and transcendence in Chinese and Western culture. State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead J. M. (2010). Moral education. In C. S. Clauss-Ehlers (ed.), Encyclopaedia of cross-cultural school psychology. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haydon, G. (2009). Reason and virtues: The paradox of R. S. Peters on moral education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43, 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. (2011). Can virtue be taught and how? Confucius on the paradox of moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 40(2), 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, E. L. (2014). Xunzi: The complete text. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jonathan, R. (1995). Education and moral development: The role of reason and circumstance. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 29, 333–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonathan, R. (1997). Special issue: Illusory freedoms: Liberalism, education and the market. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 31, 1–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazepides, T. (1969). What is the paradox of moral education? In Philosophy of education: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Philosophy of education society, in edwardsville, Ill., 1969, by the Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoblock, J. (1988). Xunzi: A translation and study of the complete works. (Vol. 1). Sanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. (2006). Habituated reason: Aristotle and the ‘paradox of moral education.’ Theory and Research in Education, 4(1), 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer, J. (1994). Education, indoctrination, and moral character. In T. Magnell (Ed.), Values and education. Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni, P. (2014). The philosophy of Confucius. In V. Shen (Ed.), Dao companion to classical Confucian philosophy, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. S. (1966). Reason and habit: The paradox of moral education. In I. Scheffler (Ed.), The philosophy of education. Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaks, A. H. (2014). The Daxue (Great Learning) and the Zhongyong (Doctrine of the Mean). In V. Shen (Ed.), Dao companion to classical Confucian philosophy. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, H. (2010). Actor-network theory of cosmopolitan education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(3), 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, A. M. (1984). Philosophical teaching as moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 13, 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, A. (2010). Virtue as mastery in early confucianism. Journal of Religious Ethics, 38(3), 404–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suttle, B. B. (1981). The need for and inevitability of moral indoctrination. Educational Studies, 12, 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2004). Michael Hand, indoctrination and the inculcation of belief. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(2), 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2008). Teaching without indoctrination: Implications for values education. Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2014). Indoctrination. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.) Encyclopedia of educational theory and philosophy. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2015). Beyond rote-memorisation: Confucius’ concept of thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(5), 428–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2017). A Confucian perspective of self-cultivation in learning: Its implications for self-directed learning. Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, 23(2), 250–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2018a). Mencius’ extension of moral feelings: Implications for cosmopolitan education. Ethics and Education, 14(1), 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2018b). Confucius. In P. Smeyers (Ed.), International handbook of philosophy of education. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2019). A Confucian interpretation of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.398,1-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2021). Mindful education: Insights from Confucian and Christian traditions. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2013). Confucius. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (1985). Children and other barbarians. Southwest Philosophy Review, 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, W.-M. (1985). Confucian thought: Selfhood as creative transformation. State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, W.-M. (1998). Confucius and confucianism. In W. H. Slote & G. A. DeVos (Eds.), Confucianism and the family (pp. 3–36). State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, B. W. (2001). Mengzi (Mencius). In P. J. Ivanhoe & B. W. Van Norden (Eds.), Readings in classical Chinese philosophy, 2nd ed. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waks, L. J. (2009). Reason and culture in cosmopolitan education. Educational Theory, 59(5), 589–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F. (2004). Confucian thinking in traditional moral education: Key ideas and fundamental features. Journal of Moral Education, 33(4), 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. B. (1991). Is there a distinction between reason and emotion in Mencius? Philosophy East and West, 41(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlene Tan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tan, C. (2021). Confucian Self-cultivation and the Paradox of Moral Education. In: Peters, M.A., Besley, T., Zhang, H. (eds) Moral Education and the Ethics of Self-Cultivation. East-West Dialogues in Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8027-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8027-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8026-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8027-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics