Image Transformation

  • Courage KamusokoEmail author
Part of the Springer Geography book series (SPRINGERGEOGR)


Image transformation refers to the processing of spectral bands into “new” images in order to highlight image features of interest. Remote sensing literature review indicates that spectral and spatial indices can improve land use/cover classification accuracy. In this workbook, selected vegetation and texture indices will be computed from Landsat 5 TM imagery. The selected vegetation and texture indices will be used for image classification in Chap.  5.


Image transformation Vegetation indices Texture Landsat 5 TM imagery 

Supplementary material (19 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (ZIP 19459 kb).


  1. Berberoglu S, Lloyd CD, Atkinson PM, Curran PJ (2000) The integration of spectral and textural information using neural networks for land cover mapping in the Mediterranean. Comput Geosci 26:385–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-3(6):610–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Herold M, Goldstein NC, Clarke KC (2003) The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: measurement, analysis and modelling. Remote Sens Environ 86:286–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Huete AR (1988) Soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sens Environ 25:295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Leutner B, Horning N (2016) Package ‘RStoolbox’. Accessed on 2 April 2017
  6. Mather PM (1999) Computer processing of remotely-sensed images-an introduction. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Qi J, Chehbouni A, Huete AR, Kerr YH, Sorooshian S (1994) A modified soil adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sens Environ 48:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rouse JW Jr, Haas R, Schell J, Deering, DW (1974) Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS. In: Third ERTS symposium, NASA, 351, pp 309–317Google Scholar
  9. Shaban MA, Dikshit O (2001) Improvement of classification in urban areas by the use of textural features: the case study of Lucknow City, Uttar Pradesh. Int J Remote Sens 22(4):565–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Tso B, Mather PM (2001) Classification methods for remotely-sensed data. Taylor and Francis, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wegmann M, Leutner B, Dech S (2016) Remote sensing and GIS for ecologists: using open source software. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Zvoleff A (2016) Package ‘glcm’. Accessed on 22 June 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Asia Air Survey Co., Ltd.KawasakiJapan

Personalised recommendations