Advertisement

Sports Mega-Events and the Concept of Soft Power

  • Jonathan GrixEmail author
  • Paul Michael Brannagan
  • Donna Lee
Chapter
  • 295 Downloads
Part of the Mega Event Planning book series (MEGAEP)

Abstract

‘Soft power’ is becoming a very popular term used by academics, politicians, journalists and commercial organisations. Its widespread use has added to its lack of clarity and obfuscated its meaning. Combining it with sports mega-events—large-scale sporting spectacles—has added to the confusion. This chapter sets about explaining both sports mega-events and the concept of soft power. Moreover, we show how the latter can be used to understand the former through the development of an ideal type of a state’s soft power package. Such a package consists of five interlinked dimensions: culture, tourism, branding, diplomacy and trade. This—the first attempt to develop a heuristic to assess a state’s soft power package—enables us to understand the mechanisms at work behind states’ attempts at pursuing policies to promote their interests.

Keywords

Sports mega-events Soft power Soft power package 

References

  1. Bason, T. (2019). Every Loser Wins: Leveraging the Olympic Bid. Unpublished PhD thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
  2. BBC. (2016, October 2). Theresa May’s Conservative Conference Speech: Key Quotes [online]. Retrieved January 6, 2017, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37535527.
  3. Black, D. (2008). Dreaming Big: The Pursuit of ‘Second Order’ Games as a Strategic Response to Globalization. Sport in Society, 11(4), 467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brannagan, P. M., & Giulianotti, R. (2014). Qatar, Global Sport and the 2022 FIFA World Cup. In Leveraging Legacies from Sports Mega-Events: Concepts and Cases (pp. 154–165). London: Palgrave Pivot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brannagan, P. M., & Giulianotti, R. (2015). Soft Power and Soft Disempowerment: Qatar, Global Sport and Football’s 2022 World Cup Finals. Leisure Studies, 34(6), 703–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cull, N. J. (2008). The Public Diplomacy of the Modern Olympic Games and China’s Soft Power Strategy. In M. E. Price & D. Dayan (Eds.), Owning the Olympics: Narratives of the New China (pp. 117–144). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  7. Durkheim, E. (1912/1995) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, trans. K.E. Fields, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ernst and Young. (2012). Rapid-Growth Markets Soft Power Index. Retrieved July 19, 2018, from https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Rapid-growth_markets:_Soft_power_index/$FILE/Rapid-growth_markets-Soft_Power_Index-Spring_2012.pdf.
  9. Fan, Y. (2008). Soft Power: Power of Attraction or Confusion? Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 4(2), 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giulianotti, R. (2015). Sport: A Critical Sociology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Grix, J. (2012). The Politics of Sports Mega-events. Political Insight, 3(1), 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grix, J., & Brannagan, P. M. (2016). Of Mechanisms and Myths: Conceptualising States’ “Soft Power” Strategies Through Sports Mega-events. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 27(2), 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grix, J., & Houlihan, B. (2014). Sports Mega-Events as Part of a Nation’s Soft Power Strategy: The Cases of Germany (2006) and the UK (2012). The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(4), 572–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grix, J., & Kramareva, N. (2017). The Sochi Winter Olympics and Russia’s Unique Soft Power Strategy. Sport in Society, 20(4), 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grix, J., & Lee, D. (2013). Soft Power, Sports Mega-Events and Emerging States: The Lure of the Politics of Attraction. Global Society, 27(4), 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grix, J., Brannagan, P. M., & Houlihan, B. (2015). Interrogating States’ Soft Power Strategies: A Case Study of Sports Mega-Events in Brazil and the UK. Global Society, 29(3), 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grix, J., Brannagan, P. M., Wood, H., & Wynne, C. (2017). State Strategies for Leveraging Sports Mega-events: Unpacking the Concept of ‘Legacy’. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 9(2), 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grix, J., Giulianotti, R., & Brannagan, P. M. (2019). Re-Thinking ‘Soft Power’ for the 21st Century. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  19. Hocking, B., Melissen, J., Riordan, S., & Sharp, P. (2012). Futures for Diplomacy-Integrative Diplomacy in the 21st Century. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’.Google Scholar
  20. Horne, J. (2007). The Four ‘Knowns’ of Sports Mega-events. Leisure Studies, 26(1), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horton, P., & Saunders, J. (2012). The ‘East Asian’ Olympic Games: What of Sustainable Legacies? The International Journal of the History of Sport, 29(April), 887–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ikenberry, G. J., & Slaughter, A. M. (2006). Forging a World of Liberty Under Law (p. 17). US National Security in the 21st Century.Google Scholar
  23. Jentleson, B. W. (2003). Tough Love Multilateralism. Washington Quarterly, 27(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kellett, P., Hede, A. M., & Chalip, L. (2008). Social Policy for Sports Events: Leveraging (Relationships with) Teams from Other Nations for Community Benefit. European Sport Management Quarterly, 8(2), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keohane, K., & Nye, J. (1998). Power and Interdependence in the Information Age. Foreign Affairs, 77(5), 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lebow, R. N. (2005). Power, Persuasion and Justice. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 551–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, G. (2009). A Theory of Soft Power and Korea’s Soft Power Strategy. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 21(2), 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manzenreiter, W. (2010). The Beijing Games in the Western Imagination of China: The Weak Power of Soft Power. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 34(1), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matheson, V. (2009). Economic Multipliers and Mega-event Analysis. International Journal of Sport Finance, 4, 63–70.Google Scholar
  30. Mesure, S. (2014, August 17). Move Over, Psy! Here Comes G-Dragon Style. The Independent. Retrieved July 13, 2015, from http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/move-over-psy-here-comes-gdragon-style-9673768.html.
  31. Monocle ‘Soft Power Survey’. (2018). Monocle. Retrieved July 19, 2018, from http://monocle.com/search/soft-power.
  32. Müller, M. (2015). What Makes an Event a Mega-event? Definitions and Sizes. Leisure Studies, 34(6), 627–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nye, J. (1990). Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. Nye, J. (2002). The Information Revolution and American Soft Power. Asia-Pacific Review, 9(1), 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nye, J. (2004). Soft Power and American Foreign Policy. Political Science Quarterly, 119(2), 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nye, J. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Brien, D. (2007). Points of Leverage: Maximizing Host Community Benefit from a Regional Surfing Festival. European Sport Management Quarterly, 7(2), 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olaveson, T. (2001). Collective Effervescence and Communitas: Processual Models of Ritual and Society in Emile Durkheim and Victor Turner. Dialectical Anthropology, 26(2), 89–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Perlez, J. (2014, November 30). Leader Asserts China’s Growing Importance on Global Stage. The New York Times. Retrieved July 17, 2015, from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/01/world/asia/leader-asserts-chinas-growing-role-on-global-stage.html?_r=0.
  40. Portland Communications. (2018). The Soft Power 30. Retrieved July 19, 2018, from http://softpower30.portland-communications.com/.
  41. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. In Culture and Politics (pp. 223–234). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Qobo, M. (2013). The Newly Emerging Powers and South Africa’s Global Strategy. Global Summitry Journal, 1(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roche, M. (1994). Mega-events and Urban Policy. Annals of Tourism Research, 21(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Slaughter, A.-M. (2005). Governing the Global Economy Through Government Networks. In F. V. Kratochwil & E. D. Mansfield (Eds.), International Organization and Global Governance: A Reader (pp. 124–140). New York: Pearson/Longman.Google Scholar
  45. Snow, N., & Taylor, P. M. (Eds.). (2008). Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Szondi, G. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual Similarities and Differences. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’.Google Scholar
  47. Turner, V. (1969). Liminality and Communitas. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure, 94, 130.Google Scholar
  48. Umekawa, T. (2015, March 12). Japan Budgets Over $15 million for Overseas Universities in Soft Power Push. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2015, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/13/us-japan-diplomacy-idUSKBN0M905M20150313.
  49. Vuving, A. L. (2009, September 3). How Soft Power Works. Paper presented at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, ON, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.apcss.org/Publications/Vuving%20How%20soft%20power%20works%20APSA%202009.pdf.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Grix
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paul Michael Brannagan
    • 1
  • Donna Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Business and Law FacultyManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations