Advertisement

CFD-Based Overpressure Prediction for Single Modules-Extended GAME Correlation

  • Guowei MaEmail author
  • Yimiao Huang
  • Jingde Li
Chapter
  • 223 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter, a newly developed correlation for estimation of boundary overpressures in and around congested regions subject to vapour gas explosions is presented. The developed model (confinement specific correlation), which consists of parameters of volume blockage ration, the density of the gas, the flame path distance, the confinement ratio and the laminar flame speed of the flammable, shows a closer correlation with detailed CFD simulation in general, especially for realistic geometries.

References

  1. Alfred, S. (1976). The phenomenology of the social world. London: Heineman Educational Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bradley, D., Lawes, M., & Liu, K. X. (2008). Turbulent flame speeds in ducts and the deflagration/detonation transition. Combustion and Flame, 154(1–2), 96–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.03.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjerketvedt, D., Bakke, J. R., & van Wingerden, K. (1997). Gas explosion handbook. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 52(1), 1–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edmund, H. (1989). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Second book: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  5. Eggen, J. B. M. M. (1998). GAME: Development of guidance for the application of the multi-energy method. TNO Report PML 1995-C44, HSE Books.Google Scholar
  6. EMEG. (1997). Explosion Model Evaluation Group, specifications of test cases for gas explosions—Test case C1. EME project, DGXII, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  7. GexCon. (2011). FLACS v9.1 user’s manual. Norway: Doxygen.Google Scholar
  8. Gurwitsch, A., & Garcia-Gomez, J. (2009). The foundation of phenomenology: Edmund Husserl and the quest for a rigorous science of philosophy. Collected works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901–1973) (Vol. 1, Series Volume 192, pp. 463–470).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2831-0_17.Google Scholar
  9. Harris, R. J., & Wickens, M. J. (1989). Understanding vapour cloud explosions—An experimental study. In 55th Autumn Meeting of The Institution of Gas Engineers.Google Scholar
  10. Harrison, A. J., & Eyre, J. A. (1987). The effect of obstacle arrays on the combustion of large premixed gas air clouds. Combustion Science and Technology, 52(1–3), 121–137.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208708952572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li, J. D., Abdel-jawad, M., & Ma, G. W. (2014). New correlation for vapor cloud explosion overpressure calculation at congested configurations. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 31, 16–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2014.05.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, J. D., Ma, G. W., Abdel-jawad, M., & Hao, H. (2014). Evaluation of gas explosion overpressures at configurations with irregularly arranged obstacles. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, B4014003.Google Scholar
  13. Mays, G. C., & Smith, P. D. (1995). Blast effects on buildings—Design of buildings to optimize resistance to blast loading. London, UK: Thomas Telford Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Mercx, W. P. M., Johnson, D. M., & Puttock, J. (1995). Validation of scaling techniques for experimental vapor cloud explosion investigations. Process Safety Progress, 14(2), 120–130.  https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.680140206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mercx, W. P. M., van den Berg, A. C., & van Leeuwen, D. (1998). Application of correlations to quantify the source strength of vapour cloud explosions in realistic situations. Final report for the project: ‘GAMES’. TNO Report PML 1998-C53.Google Scholar
  16. Moen, I. O., Donato, M., Knystautas, R., & Lee, J. H. (1980). Flame acceleration due to turbulence produced by obstacles. Combustion and Flame, 39(1), 21–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(80)90003-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schumann, S., Haas, W., & Schmittberger, H. (1993). Dust explosion venting—Investigation of the secondary explosion for vessel volumes from 0.3 M(3) to 250 M(3). Staub Reinhaltung Der Luft, 53(12), 445–451.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, P. D., & Hetherington, J. G. (1994). Blast and ballistic loading of structures. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  19. van den Berg, A. C., & Mos, A. L. (2005). Research to improve guidance on separation distance for the multi-energy method. TNO Prins Maurits Laboratory Research Report 369.Google Scholar
  20. Vanwingerden, C. J. M. (1988). Investigation into the blast produced by vapour cloud explosions in partially confined areas. TNO Prins Maurits Laboratory Report No. PML 1988-C195.Google Scholar
  21. Vanwingerden, C. J. M. (1989). Experimental investigation into the strength of blast waves generated by vapour cloud explosions in congested areas. In 6th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil and Transportation EngineeringHebei University of TechnologyTianjinChina
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, School of EngineeringUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Infrastructural Monitoring and ProtectionCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations