Advertisement

Standard-Based Lifecycle Risk Management of Explosion Events

  • Guowei MaEmail author
  • Yimiao Huang
  • Jingde Li
Chapter
  • 226 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter outlines the prevailing explosion risk management methods based on worldwide industrial standards. Wherein, a lifecycle risk management procedure for explosion accidents based on structural integrity management (SIM) is introduced. A quantitative risk assessment process including frequency analysis and consequence modelling is explained, and risk reduction methods including explosion risk reduction and structural strengthening are demonstrated.

References

  1. API. (2005). Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms—Working stress design. Section 17: Assessment of existing platforms. Washington, D.C.: American Petroleum Institute. Google Scholar
  2. API. (2006). Recommended practice for the design of offshore facilities against fire and blast loading (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Petroleum Institute.Google Scholar
  3. API, API RP 2SIM. (2014). Structural integrity management of fixed offshore structures (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Petroleum Institute.Google Scholar
  4. El-Reedy, M. A. (2012). Offshore structures design, construction and maintenance. Waltham, MA, U.S.A.: Gulf Professional Publishing, imprint of Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. HSE. (2003). Fire, explosion and risk assessment topic guidance, Issue no. 1.Google Scholar
  6. HSE. (2006). Structural strengthening of offshore topsides structures as part of explosion risk reduction methods. The steel Construction Institute.Google Scholar
  7. HSE. (2017a). ‘ALARP “at a glance”’. Available at http://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/theory/alarpglance.htm.
  8. HSE. (2017b). ‘Guidance on ALARP Decisions in COMAH’. Available at http://www.hse.gov.uk/foi/internalops/hid_circs/permissioning/spc_perm_37/.
  9. ISO 13702. (2015). Petroleum and natural gas industries—Control and mitigation of fires and explosions on offshore production installations—Requirements and guidelines.Google Scholar
  10. ISO 31000. (2009). Risk management—Principles and guidelines (1st ed.). Switzerland.Google Scholar
  11. ISO 6184/4. (1985). Determination of the efficacy of explosion suppression systems.Google Scholar
  12. Spouge, J. (1999). A guide to quantitative risk assessment for offshore installations. CMPT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil and Transportation EngineeringHebei University of TechnologyTianjinChina
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, School of EngineeringUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Infrastructural Monitoring and ProtectionCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations