On the Volume of Redistribution: Across Income Levels and Across Groups

Abstract

The optimal income taxation literature focuses on the tradeoff between the equity gains of higher progressivity versus its greater incentive costs at the individual level. This paper highlights a neglected aspect of redistribution—greater progressivity requires a higher volume of gross redistributive flows, across income levels. If these flows are costly to manage, administratively, or politically, then progressivity will be lower. Moreover, if redistribution across income levels implies redistribution across sociopolitically salient groups because of the way in which these groups line up relative to the income distribution, this can be an added cost in the objective function and progressivity is further disadvantaged. The paper develops a simple framework in which these questions can be addressed. Among the many interesting results is that when the capacity for the volume of redistributive flows, across income levels or across sociopolitical groups, is reached, an increase in market inequality can lead to a fall in progressivity in the tax-transfer regime without any change in the government’s preferences for equity. A focus on the volume of redistribution thus opens up an important set of theoretical and empirical questions for analysis and for policy.

Paper written as contribution to Festschrift for Satya Chakravarty upon his retirement from the Indian Statistical Institute. This chapter has been published by the author under (i) the ECINEQ Society for the Study of Economic Inequality Working Paper Series as ECINEQ WP 2018–462, (ii) the CEPR Discussion Paper Series as DP 12816, and (iii) Dyson Cornell Working Papers Series as 18–03.