Abstract
In the literature on polarization, an increasing map of the between-group expression and a decreasing map of the within-group expression with respect to a population subgroup-decomposable inequality index is known as an abbreviated or reduced form monotonic polarization index. The between-group expression is said to represent the alienation characteristic of polarization and the within-group expression negatively reflects the identification characteristic. Chakravarty and Maharaj (2011) developed an ordering for ranking alternative distributions of income based on such type of polarization indices. They also characterized several polarization indices of the said type using axioms which are easily comprehensible and intuitive. In this paper, we consider some alternative formulations of the axioms used in Chakravarty and Maharaj (2011) from a more primitive standpoint. A general nature of a polarization map is derived and the setup is extended to consider pooling of two populations. An empirical illustration of polarization indices using Indian National Sample Survey data is presented.
The authors thank Hitesh Tripathi for computational assistance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amiel Y, Cowell FA (2003) Inequality, welfare and monotinicity. Res Econ Inequal 9:35–46
Chakravarty SR (2009a) Inequality, polarization and poverty: advances in distributional analysis. Springer, New York
Chakravarty SR (2009b) Equity and efficiency as components of a social welfare function. Int J Econ Theory 5:181–199
Chakravarty SR, Maharaj B (2011) Subgroup decomposable inequality indices and reduced-form indices of polarization. Keio Econ Stud 47:57–83
Donaldson D, Weymark JA (1980) A single parameter generalization of the Gini indices of inequality. J Econ Theory 22:67–86
Ebert U (1987) Size and distribution of income as determinants of social welfare. J Econ Theory 41:25–33
Esteban JM, Ray D (1994) On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica 62:819–851
Foster JE (1985) Inequality measurement in fair allocation by Young HP (ed) American Mathematical Society: Providence
Rodriguez J, Salas R (2003) Extended bipolarization and inequality measures. Res Econ Inequal 9:69–83
Shorrocks AF (1980) The class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econometrica 48:613–625
Silber J, Deutsch J, Hanoka M (2007) On the link between the concepts of kurtosis and bipolarization. Econ Bull 4:1–6
Zhang X, Kanbur R (2001) What differences do polarization measures make? Appl China J Dev Stud 37:85–98
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maharaj, B., Chattopadhyay, N. (2019). Reduced Form Polarization Index: Alternative Formulations and Extensions. In: Dasgupta, I., Mitra, M. (eds) Deprivation, Inequality and Polarization. Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7944-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7944-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7943-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7944-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)