Advertisement

Integrated Global Red Meat

  • Joseph William Holloway
  • Jianping Wu
Chapter

Abstract

The general conclusion found by audits of consumer acceptance of North American beef is that the USDA Beef Quality Grading System and the Canadian Beef Quality System, although perhaps the best in the world, allow too much variation in eating quality. Because grading systems are, at best, indirect methods for assessing eating quality and because many of the traits associated with eating quality are highly heritable and also influenced by known elements of the production system (both pre- and post-harvest), it appears that the only realistic method to guarantee consistent, quality beef eating experiences involves identification of system elements impacting the eating quality of the final product and orchestration of these elements into coherent systems designed to produce these products consistently.

References

  1. Belk, K.E., D.R. Woerner, R.J. Delmore, J.D. Tatum, H. Yang, and J.N. Sofo. 2014. The meat industry: Do we think and behave globally or locally? Meat Science 98: 556–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloomberg. 2014. Industry leaderboard. Accessed 22 Mar 2014 at: http://www.bloomberg.com/visual-data/industries/detail/restaurants.
  3. Clyma, K. 2014. Successful sales: Ranking the industry’s top processors, 16–24. Meat & Poultry Magazine.Google Scholar
  4. Degen, R. J., and K.M. Wong. 2012. An examination of the resource-based horizontal acquisition strategy of JBS — The biggest meat packer in the world, ed. R. Vogel. Proceedings New York State Economics Association 65th Annual Meeting, Vol. 5, 37–46).Google Scholar
  5. Dikeman, M.E. 1987. Fat reduction in animals and the effects on palatability and consumer acceptance of meat products. In Proceedings American meat science association, national livestock and meat board, 93–103.Google Scholar
  6. Igo, J.L., D.L. Van Overbeke, D.R. Woerner, J.D. Tatum, D.L. Pendell, L.L. Vedral, G.G. Mafi, M.C. Moore, R.O. McKeith, G.D. Gray, D.B. Griffin, D.S. Hale, J.W. Savell, and K.E. Belk. 2013. Phase I of The National Beef Quality Audit-2011: Quantifying willingness-to-pay, best-worst scaling, and current status of quality characteristics in different beef industry marketing sectors. Journal of Animal Science 91: 1907–1919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. JBS. 2014. Investor relations. Accessed 22 Mar 2014 at: http://jbss.infoinvest.com.br/.
  8. Mateescu, R.G., P.A. Oltenacu, A.J. Garmyn, G.G. Mafi, and D.L. Van Overbeke. 2016. Strategies to predict and improve eating quality of cooked beef using carcass and meat composition traits in Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 94: 2160–2171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McDonald’s. 2012. McDonald’s 2012 Annual Report. Available at: http://www.aboutmcdonalds.com/content/dam/AboutMcDonalds/Investors/. Accessed 22 Mar 2014.
  10. Miller, M.F., K.L. Huffman, S.Y. Gilbert, L.L. Hamman, and C.B. Ramsey. 1995a. Retail consumer acceptance of beef tenderized with calcium chloride. Journal of Animal Science 73: 2308–2314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Miller, M.F., L.C. Hoover, K.D. Cook, A.L. Guerra, K.L. Huffman, K.S. Tinney, C.B. Ramsey, H.C. Brittin, and L.M. Huffman. 1995b. Consumer acceptability of beef steak tenderness in the home and restaurant. Journal of Food Science 60: 963–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rovai, R., M.R. Piscopo, and E.A. Maccari. 2013. Innovation in the strategies of internationalization of the Brazilian multinationals: Evaluation of the cultural national dimensions: A study case of the meat processing sector. International Journal of Innovation 1: 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Salvage, B. 2013. Mega acquisitions keep stunning the industry: Acquisitions have transformed the US meat and poultry industry in just a little over a decade. Meat Poultry.Com. Available at: http://www.meatpoultry.com/Writers/Bryan%20Salvage.aspx?page=2. Accessed 18 Mar 2014.
  14. Savell, J.W., R.E. Branson, H.R. Cross, D.M. Stiffler, J.W. Wise, D.B. Griffin, and G.C. Smith. 1987. National consumer retail beef study: Palatability evaluations of beef loin steaks that differed in marbling. Journal of Food Science 52: 517–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Savell, J.W., C.L. Lorenzen, T.R. Neely, R.K. Miller, J.D. Tatum, J.W. Wise, J.F. Taylor, M.J. Buyck, and J.O. Reagan. 1999. Beef customer satisfaction: Cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top sirloin steak. Journal of Animal Science 77: 645–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Walmart. 2014. Walmart facts. Available at: http://news.walmart.com/walmart-facts/. Accessed 17 Mar 2014.
  17. Watson, R., A. Gee, R. Polkinghorne, and M. Porter. 2008. Consumer assessment of eating quality—Development of protocols for Meat Standards Australia (MSA) testing. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48: 1360–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Science Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph William Holloway
    • 1
  • Jianping Wu
    • 2
  1. 1.Animal ScienceTexas A&M UniversityUvaldeUSA
  2. 2.Gansu Academy of Agricultural SciencesLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations