Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Can I Gain Access to Data Sources?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surviving and Thriving in Postgraduate Research

  • 1715 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss issues and considerations associated with negotiating and gaining access to data sources, something that many research texts are relatively circumspect about. Difficulty in obtaining access, restrictions placed on access, or withdrawal of support can be devastating to a postgraduate researcher and can cause not only considerable emotional upheaval, but such a setback can also have ramifications on project quality as well as completion. Data access could involve digital and/or personal interaction with participants as well as access to documents and other artefacts and access to these may be controlled by one or more gatekeepers. Negotiating access is, essentially, an ongoing process of determining what is required, getting into an organisation or community and gaining their permission, obtaining access to physical materials/artefacts and/or participant involvement and then possibly doing this all over again with another organisation or community. We suggest a ten-step process for successfully gaining access to data sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, D. G., & Hatton, D. C. (2000). Accessing vulnerable populations for research. Western Journal of Nursing, 22(2), 244–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard to reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, Summer 33. Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford UK. Retrieved January 19, 2019, from http://citizenresearchnetwork.pbworks.com/f/accessing%2Bhard%2Bto%2Breach%2Bpopulations%2Bfor%2Bresearch.doc.

  • Ball, J., & Janyst, P. (2008). Enacting research ethics in partnerships with indigenous communities in Canada: “Do it in a good way”. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(2), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2004). Internet data collection. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broadhead, R. S., & Rist, R. C. (1976). Gatekeepers and the social control of social research. Social Problems, 23(3), 325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, D., Boddy, D., & McCalman, J. (1988). Getting in, getting on, getting out and getting back. In A. Bryman (Ed.), Doing research in organisations (pp. 63–77). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, M. (2013). Demystifying the institutional repository for success. Amsterdam: Chandos Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R. (1984). In the field. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge University Press. (2015). Data access and research transparency (DA-RT): A joint statement by political science journal editors. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(3), 421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, R., Collins, M., Green, G., & Candy, A. (1998). Managing yourself: A competence approach to supervisory management (2nd ed.). London: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2012). Digital libraries and information access: Research perspectives. London: Facet Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2014). Managing and sharing research data: A guide to good practice. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram, F. (2001). Rangahau Māori : Tona tika, tona pono—The validity and integrity of Māori  research. In M. Tolich (Ed.), Research ethics in Aotearoa New Zealand: Concepts, practice, critique (pp. 5–52). Auckland, NZ: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (2000). The doctoral experience success and failure in graduate school. London: Falmer Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denscombe, M. (2017). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (6th ed.). London: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devers, K. J., & Frankel, R. M. (2000). Study design in qualitative research—(part 2): Sampling and data collection strategies. Education for Health, 13(2), 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, T., & Scrimgeour, M. (2006). Ethics in indigenous research—Connecting with community. Journal of Bioethical Inquriy, 3(3), 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, B. C., Coon, D. W., & Crogan, N. L. (2007). Personalismo and breaking barriers: Accessing Hispanics populations for clinical services and research. Geriatric Nursing, 28(5), 289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feijen, M., Horstmann, W., Mangho, P., Robinson, M., & Russell, R. (2007). Driver: Building the network for accessing digital repositories across Europe. Ariadne, 53. Retrieved January 19, 2019, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/53/feijen-et-al/.

  • Feldman, M. S., Bell, J., & Berger, M. Y. (2003). Gaining access: A practical and theoretical guide for qualitative researchers. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, N. G., Lee, R. M., & Blank, G. (2008). The Sage handbook of online research methods. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. E., Martin, M. E., & Straf, M. L. (1985). Sharing research data. Washington, DC: National Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. (2002). Shared fantasy: Role playing games as social worlds (2nd ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfpenny, P., & Procter, R. (2015). Innovations in digital research methods. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harron, K., Goldstein, H., & Dibben, C. (Eds.). (2015). Methodological developments in data linkage. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. (2005). Gaining access to data sources in statutory social work agencies: The long and winding road. British Journal of Social Work, 35(7), 1193–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P., Duberley, J., Close, P., & Cassell, C. (1999). Negotiating field roles in manufacturing management research: The need for reflexivity. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(12), 1234–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. B., O’Rourke, N., & DeLongis, A. (2014). Social media recruitment and online data collection: A beginner’s guide and best practices for accessing low-prevalence and hard-to-reach populations. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 55(4), 240–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J., Stodden, V., Bender, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (Eds.). (2014). Privacy, big data, and the public good: Frameworks for engagement. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, M., & Walby, K. (2012). Brokering access: Power, politics and freedom of information process in Canada. Vancouver, BC, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maginn, P. J. (2007). Negotiating and securing access: Reflections from a study into urban regeneration and community participation in ethnically diverse neighborhoods in London, England. Field Methods, 19(4), 425–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschan-Piekkari, R., & Welch, C. (2011). Rethinking the case study in international business and management research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, J. K., & Richter, A. W. (2007). Negotiating access: Foot in the door or door in the face? Psychologist, 20(3), 144–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauthner, M. (2006). Methodological aspects of collecting data from children: Lessons from three research projects. Children and Society, 11(1), 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mochmann, E., de Guchteneire, P., & Guchteneire, P. F. A. (1990). Data protection and data access: Reports from ten countries on data protection and data access in social research, with an annotated international bibliography. International Federation of Data Organizations for the Social Sciences, Sociaal-Wetenschappelijk Informatie- en Documentatiecentrum (Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Amsterdam: North-Holland [for] SWIDOC/IFDO.

    Google Scholar 

  • NaCTeM. (2016). The National Centre for Text Mining. University of Manchester. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from http://www.nactem.ac.uk/.

  • Norcera, J. L. A. (2002). Ethnography and hermeneutics in cyber cultural research accessing virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(2) JCNC721. Retrieved January 19, 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00146.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okumus, F., Altinay, L., & Roper, A. (2007). Gaining access for research: Reflections from experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OSSWATCH. (2014). Open Source Options for Education. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from http://oss-watch.ac.uk/.

  • Polonsky, J. M., & Waller, S. D. (2015). Designing and managing a research project: A business student’s guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesch, S. K., Tosi, C. B., & Thurston, C. (2007). Accessing young adolescents and their families. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 31(4), 323–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, L. I. (2006). Indigenist research and aboriginal Australia. In J. Kunnie & N. I. Goduka (Eds.), Indigenous peoples’ wisdom and power: Affirming our knowledge through narratives (pp. 61–77). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (1998). Entering the field. In G. B. Rossman & S. F. Rallis (Eds.), Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapsford, R., & Jupp, V. (2006). Data collection and analysis. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scholarly Editions. (2013). Algorithms—Advances in research and application (2013th ed.). Atlanta: Scholarly Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, K. B. (2018). Crowdsourcing research: Data collection with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 140–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1997). Indigenous research ethics: Policy, protocol and practice. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 25(1), 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonising methodologies, research and indigenous peoples. Dunedin, NZ: University of Otago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumathi, S., & Sivanandam, S. N. (2006). Introduction to data mining and its applications. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, W. (2008). Chapter 1: Research methods for business students. Retrieved November 7, 2018, from http://site.iugaza.edu.ps/walhabil/files/2010/02/Chapter_1.pdf.

  • Thomas, M. R., & Brubaker, D. L. (2007). Theses and dissertations: A guide to planning, research, and writing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolich, M., & Davidson, C. (1999). Starting fieldwork: Introduction to qualitative research in New Zealand. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Data Archive. (2018). Retrieved November 9, 2018, from http://data-archive.ac.uk/.

  • UK Data Service. (2018). ESRC Economic & Social Research Council. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/.

  • Valli, L. (1986). Becoming clerical workers (critical social thought). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanat, C. L. (2008). Getting past the gatekeepers: Differences between access and cooperation in public school research. Field Methods, 20(2), 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia

    Ray Cooksey

  2. RMIT University Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Gael McDonald

Authors
  1. Ray Cooksey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gael McDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ray Cooksey .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cooksey, R., McDonald, G. (2019). How Can I Gain Access to Data Sources?. In: Surviving and Thriving in Postgraduate Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7747-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7747-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7746-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7747-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation