Advertisement

Woven Military Fabrics from the Aspect of the Microbial Barrier Permeability

Conference paper
  • 441 Downloads

Abstract

Functionality is of utmost importance for fabrics designed for military purposes, where woven fabric structural parameters and finishing processes greatly affect the definition and achievement of high set properties demands. Considering the application conditions of military fabrics and the high exposure to microorganisms from environment, as well as from the direct and indirect transfer between users, the possibility of contamination is unavoidable. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to determine whether and to what extent military fabrics have the properties of microbial barrier permeability. Determination of microbial barrier permeability was conducted according to the newly developed method. The most resistant forms of microorganisms were used, the bacterial endospores of apatogenic species: Geobacillus stearothermophilus and Bacillus atrophaeus. The analysis of the obtained results and the analysis of correlations between some relevant fabric properties confirm the extremely complex structural aspect of the woven fabrics. Tested woven fabrics designed for military purposes show a very good microbial barrier permeability with a different adhesion of microorganisms, conditioned by the complex woven fabric structure, based on which can be approached to further targeted functional designing of specific elements.

Keywords

Microbial barrier permeability Military purposes Woven fabric structures 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support was provided within the framework, Support scientific research 2017, “Natural Fibres Agrotextile” (TP 12/17), financed by the University of Zagreb.

References

  1. 1.
    Wilusz, E.: Military textiles. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sparks, E.: Advances in military textiles and personal equipment. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Winterhalter, C.A., Lomba, R.A., Tucker, D.W., Martin, O.D.: Novel approach to soldier flame protection. J. ASTM Int. 2(2), 227–232 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mijović, B., Skenderi, Z., Salopek, I.: Comparison of subjective and objective measurement of sweat transfer rate. Coll. Antropol. 33(2), 315–320 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thiry, M.C.: Prescription textile protection. AATCC Rev. 10, 30–36 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Teufel, L., Redl, B.: Improved methods for the investigation of the interaction between textiles and microorganisms. Lenzing. Ber. 85, 54–60 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beck, W.C., Carlson, W.W.: Aseptic barriers. Arch. Surg. 112(2), 2240–2244 (1981)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borkow, G., Gabbay, J.: Biocidal textiles can help fight nosocomial infections. Med. Hypotheses 70, 990–994 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duraković, S.: Opća mikrobiologija. Prehrambeno-tehnološki inženjering, Zagreb (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rogina-Car, B., Budimir, A., Katović, D.: Microbial barrier properties of healthcare professional uniforms. Text. Res. J. 87(15), 1860–1868 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rogina-Car, B., Budimir, A., Turčić, V., Katović, D.: Do multi-use cellulosic textiles provide safe protection against the contamination of sterilized items? Cellulose 21(3), 2101–2109 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Textile TechnologyUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations