• Ibolya LosonczEmail author


This chapter brings the threads of the previous chapters together and locates the two broad systemic malfunctions within government contributing to the experience of institutional disrespect among South Sudanese, and potentially all refugee groups within the resettlement context. The first of these concerns the way policies and social structures (re)produce social and economic insecurities among refugee migrants by failing to provide accessible means towards their goals of participation in their new social space. The second relates to the presence of highly bureaucratic institutional procedures which are unresponsive to the needs of refugee migrants and other marginalised groups. The chapter concludes by identifying implications for policy development and programme delivery emerging from the study.


Institutional disrespect Responsive governance Resettlement Goals and means 


  1. Advisory Group on Reform of Australian Government Administration. (2009). Reform of Australian Government administration: Building the world’s best public service. Canberra, ACT: Attorney-General’s Department.Google Scholar
  2. Advisory Group on Reform of Australian Government Administration. (2010). Ahead of the game: Blueprint for the reform of Australian Government administration. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.Google Scholar
  3. Braithwaite, V. (2009). Defiance in taxation and governance: Resisting and dismissing authority in a democracy. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  4. Children and Young People Act. (2008). ACT, A2008–19 Stat.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, T., & Klettner, A. (2013). Targets and quotas: A two-pronged approach to increase board diversity. The Conversation. Retrieved from
  6. Gebre-Selassie, H. (2008). Integration strategies of migrants and refugees: The Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia
  7. Hall, E. T. (1989). Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  8. Honneth, A. (1992). Integrity and disrespect. Principles of a conception of morality based on the theory of recognition. Political Theory, 20(2), 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jupp, J. (2011). Politics, public policy and multiculturalism. In J. Jupp & M. Clyne (Eds.), Multiculturalism and integration: A harmonious relationship (pp. 41–52). Canberra, ACT: ANU E Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Sturgess, G. L. (2001). Beating the bureaucracy: Humanising modern government. In P. Botsman & M. Latham (Eds.), The enabling state: People before bureaucracy (pp. 187–217). Sydney, NSW: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  12. Tyler, T. R. (2008). Psychology and institutional design. Review of Law and Economics, 4(3), 801–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. UNHCR. (2013). The integration of resettled refugees: Essential for establishing a resettlement programme and fundamentals for sustainable resettlement programmes. Geneva, Switzerland: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  14. Westoby, P. (2009). The sociality of refugee healing: In dialogue with Southern Sudanese refugees resettling within Australia – Towards a social model of healing. Brisbane, QLD: Common Ground.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian National UniversityActonAustralia

Personalised recommendations