Advertisement

Methodology

  • Ibolya LosonczEmail author
Chapter
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter introduces the design of the research project. It starts out by outlining my research design, including my theoretical lens as a researcher, my methodology and the methods used in the study. The section ‘Data Collection and Analysis’ reports on data collection and analysis, including locating myself in the research. It concludes by discussing the limitations of the research and also how the validity of both the participant accounts and the conclusions reached were ensured throughout the research.

Keywords

Methodology Interdisciplinary design Critical realism Grounded theory 

References

  1. Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Brighton, UK: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  4. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, A. E. (2003). Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 553–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Danermark, B., Ekström, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (2002). Explaining society. Critical realism in the social sciences. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Firestone, W. A. (1993). Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22(4), 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gorman, J. (1995). Being and doing: Practicing a secret profession. Reflections, 4(1), 35–40.Google Scholar
  9. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  10. Hart, C., & Maiden, S. (2007). Race to point finger of blame. The Australian. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22538228-28737,00.html
  11. Iosifides, T. (2012). Migration research between positivistic scientism and relativism: A critical realist way out. In C. Vargas-Silva (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in migration (pp. 26–49). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  12. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalist inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Losoncz, I. (2014). Absence of respect: South Sudanese experiences of Australian government and social institutions. PhD, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.Google Scholar
  14. Losoncz, I. (2017). Methodological approaches and considerations in regulatory research. In P. Drahos (Ed.), Regulation, institutions and networks (pp. 77–96). Canberra, ACT: ANU Press.Google Scholar
  15. Marlowe, J. M. (2009). Accessing ‘authentic’ knowledge: Being and doing with the Sudanese community. The Australian Community Psychologist, 21(1), 39–49.Google Scholar
  16. Marlowe, J. M. (2010). ‘Walking the Line’: Southern Sudanese narratives and responding to trauma. PhD dissertation, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.Google Scholar
  17. Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller, K. (2004). Beyond the frontstage: Trust, access, and the relational context in research with refugee communities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33(3/4), 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oliver, C. (2012). Critical realist grounded theory: A New approach for social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 42(2), 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Schaffer, F. (2006). Ordinary language interviewing. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 150–160). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Vauxhall, UK: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  23. van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Westoby, P. (2009). The sociality of refugee healing: In dialogue with Southern Sudanese refugees Resettling within Australia – Towards a social model of healing. Seaholme, Australia: Common Ground.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian National UniversityActonAustralia

Personalised recommendations