Advertisement

ACMSM25 pp 745-753 | Cite as

Numerical Analysis of Reinforced Corbel Width Using High Strength Concrete

Conference paper
  • 1.3k Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 37)

Abstract

High strength concrete corbels are becoming a frequent attribute in the building construction industry, however design formulas of current concrete structures codes often require iterative design processes. This study furthers the research of Chilvers and Fragomeni (Aust J Struct Eng 4:169–175, 2003, [3]) by using their design chart to design corbels of varying widths and strength, and evaluate the corbel using the Finite Element Method. Three-dimensional finite element models are developed with non-linear material properties and Young’s Moduli of 70–90 MPa. Six different corbel designs are modelled with varying widths from 300 to 900 mm. Results show that increasing the width of the corbel leads to a decrease in the magnitude of tensile stress and stress peaks. More specifically, increasing the width from 300 to 600 mm results in a more significant decrease in compressive stress as compared to increasing the width from 600 to 900 mm. Increasing the concrete strength from 70 to 90 MPa also increases the stress magnitude, however the safety factor is increased. Overall, the results of this study confirms that the design chart is accurate for the design of corbels ranging in widths from 300 to 900 mm for concrete strengths of 70–90 MPa.

Keywords

Corbel High strength concrete Finite element method 

References

  1. 1.
    AS3600-2009 (2009) Australian Standards for Concrete Structures (Incorporating Amendment No. 1 and 2). Standards AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Canha RMF, Kuchma DA, Debs MKE, Souza RAD (2014) Numerical analysis of reinforced high strength concrete corbels. Eng StructGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chilvers M, Fragomeni S (2003) Corbel design chart for 20–100 MPa concrete. Aust J Struct Eng 4:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cook PD, Ronald A, Allen, DT, Ansley PE, Marcus H, Stiffness evaluation of neoprene bearing pads under long term loads. University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hughes S, Crisp B (2008) Structural precast concrete in Melbourne, Australia. In: Structural engineering conference 2008: engaging with structural engineering. MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khalifa E (2012) Macro-mechanical strut and tie model for analysis of fibrous high-strength concrete corbelsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Loo Y-C, Chowdhury SH (2010) Reinforced and prestressed concrete. Cambridge University Press, SydneyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mindess S (2014) Developments in the formulation and reinforcement of concrete. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strand7 (2004) Strand7 theoretical manual, JournalGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Syroka E, Bobiński J, Tejchman J (2011) FE analysis of reinforced concrete corbels with enhanced continuum models. Finite Elem Anal Des 47(9):1066–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yong Y-K, Balaguru P (1994) Behavior of reinforced high strength concrete corbelsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yong Y, McCloskey DH, Nawy EG (1985) Reinforced corbels of high-strength concrete, Special Publication 87:197–212Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Engineering and Science, Structural Mechanics and Sustainable Materials Research GroupVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations