Advertisement

ACMSM25 pp 605-613 | Cite as

Moisture Damage in Asphalt Pavements at Aggregate-Asphalt Interface—A Finite Element Study

  • R. C. Van StadenEmail author
  • S. Fragomeni
Conference paper
  • 1k Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 37)

Abstract

Moisture is detrimental to pavement performance. This is especially evident during high intensity rainfall events, where it is common to observe rapid deterioration of flexible pavement systems. Both experimental and numerical studies have evaluated the impact of moisture on pavement deterioration. However, these have not accurately defined the adhesive and cohesive failure at aggregate scale. A three-dimensional (3D) finite element model is developed with non-linear material properties based on realistic aggregate geometry. Boundary condition are obtained from finite element models of a pavement system under repeated dynamic heavy vehicle axle wheel loading. The tensile stress is measured within the asphalt and at the aggregate-asphalt interface. Results show that cohesive film failure may occur at 14,946 loading cycles at several locations where the film thickness is reduced. Adhesive failure at the aggregate-asphalt interface, is also predicted at locations where the aggregates geometrical edges cause stress concentrations.

Keywords

Pavement Finite element method Climate change 

References

  1. 1.
    AS2008-1997 (1997) Residual bitumen for pavements. Standards AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Austroads (2004) A guide to the structural design of road pavements. AustroadsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Austroads (2012) Guide to pavement technology part 2: pavement structural design. Austroads, 275Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chatti K, Lysmer J, Monismith CL (1994) Dynamic finite-element analysis of jointed concrete pavements. University of California Transportation Center, 1, 90Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deng Q, Zhang C (2008) Three-dimensional finite element simulated on vertical dynamic responses to semi rigid pavement under dynamic load effect. Highw Eng 3:15Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dondi G (1994) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of a reinforced paved road. In: Fifth international conference on geotextiles, geomembranes, and related topics, vol 1, pp 95–100Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hagen M, Cochran G (1996) Comparison of pavement drainage systems. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 1519:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hefer AW (2005) Adhesion in bitumen-aggregate systems and quantification of the effect of water on the adhesive bond. Texas A&M University, TexasGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hicks RG (1991) Moisture damage in asphalt concrete. Transportation Research BoardGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hossain MI, Tarefder RA (2014) Quantifying moisture damage at mastic–aggregate interface. Int J Pavement Eng 15(2):174–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kakar MR, Hamzah MO, Valentin J (2015) A review on moisture damages of hot and warm mix asphalt and related investigations. J Clean Prod 99:39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim H, Buttlar WG (2009) Discrete fracture modeling of asphalt concrete. Int J Solids Struct 46(13):2593–2604zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim H, Wagoner MP, Buttlar WG (2008) Simulation of fracture behavior in asphalt concrete using a heterogeneous cohesive zone discrete element model. J Mater Civ Eng 20(8):552–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim Y-R, Little D, Lytton R (2004) Effect of moisture damage on material properties and fatigue resistance of asphalt mixtures. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 1891:48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim Y-R, Little D, Song I (2003) Effect of mineral fillers on fatigue resistance and fundamental material characteristics: mechanistic evaluation. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 1832:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim YR, Lee H-J, Little DN (1997) Fatigue characterization of asphalt concrete using viscoelasticity and continuum damage theory (with discussion). J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 66Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Little DN, Jones D (2003) Chemical and mechanical processes of moisture damage in hot-mix asphalt pavements. In: National seminar on moisture sensitivity of asphalt pavementsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lytton R (2004) Adhesive fracture in asphalt concrete mixtures. In: Youtcheff J (ed). PressGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mallela J, George K (1994) Three-dimensional dynamic response model for rigid pavements. Transp Res Rec 1(1448):92–99Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marek CR, Herrin M (1968) Tensile behavior and failure characteristics of asphalt cements in thin films. In: Association of asphalt paving technologists-proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Masad E, Tashman L, Little D, Zbib H (2005) Viscoplastic modeling of asphalt mixes with the effects of anisotropy, damage and aggregate characteristics. Mech Mater 37(12):1242–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mills B, Tighe S, Andrey J, Smith J, Huen K (2009) Climate change implications for flexible pavement design and performance in southern Canada. J Transp Eng 135(10):773–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Santucci L (2002) Moisture sensitivity of asphalt pavements. Tech TopicsGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Strand7 (2004) Strand7 theoretical manual. JournalGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tarefder RA, Ahmad M (2014) Evaluating the relationship between permeability and moisture damage of asphalt concrete pavements. J Mater Civ EngGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Uddin W, Zhang D, Fernandez F (1994) Finite element simulation of pavement discontinuities and dynamic load response. Transp Res Rec 1(1448):100–106Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    van Staden RC, Fragomeni S, Chen Y (2016) Full-depth flexible pavement performance impacted by rainfall: finite element analysis. In: Conference on the mechanics of structures and materials (ACMSM24), Perth, Western Australia. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vardy M, Oppenheimer M, Dubash NK, O’Reilly J, Jamieson D (2017) The intergovernmental panel on climate change: challenges and opportunities. Annu Rev Environ Resour 42:55–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    VicRoads (2012) VicRoads supplement to the Austroads guide to road design. Part 3—geometric design. Journal 58Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang H, Wang J, Chen J (2014) Micromechanical analysis of asphalt mixture fracture with adhesive and cohesive failure. Eng Fract Mech 132:104–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wu C-P, Shen P-A (1996) Dynamic analysis of concrete pavements subjected to moving loads. J Transp Eng 122(5):367–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yapp MT, Durrani AZ, Finn FN (1993) Review of state and industry reports on asphalt properties and relationship to pavement performance. Strategic Highway Research Program report SHRP-A-623. JournalGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yin H, Solaimanian M, Kumar T, Stoffels S (2007) The effect of loading time on flexible pavement dynamic response: a finite element analysis. Mech Time-Depend Mater 11(3–4):265–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zaghloul S, White T, Drnevich V, Coree B (1994) Dynamic analysis of FWD loading and pavement response using a three-dimensional dynamic finite-element program. ASTM Special Technical Publication 1198(1), pp 125–138Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zollinger CJ (2005) Application of surface energy measurements to evaluate moisture susceptibility of asphalt and aggregates. Texas A&M University, TexasGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Structural Mechanics and Sustainable Materials Research GroupCollege of Engineering and Science, Victoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations