Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of Classifiers in the Context of Papaya Disease Recognition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Algorithms for Intelligent Systems ((AIS))

Abstract

Nowadays, machine learning techniques have been effectively being applied to a wide area of applications. Although a large number of state-of-the-art classification algorithms have been applied in different applications, they are infrequently tested in the same classification problem domain. In this paper, nine (9) prominent classification algorithms are compared in index of six (6) performance metrics in a computer vision context. Machine vision based papaya disease recognition can help to build an online agro-medical expert system that recognizes the defects of fruit by diseases from an image that is taken using mobile or another handheld device in order to distantly help both beginner and professional growers in the agriculture-based country like Bangladesh. In this context, since a classifier is required, the merits of prominent classification algorithms need to be thoroughly assessed. So, we compare the performances of SVM, C4.5, naïve Bayes, logistic regression, kNN, random forest, backpropagation neural network, counterpropagation neural network, and RIPPER classifiers. SVM outperforms all other classifiers achieving more than 95% accuracy, whereas kNN performs worst showing 71.11% accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bangladesh – agriculture, https://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/economies/Asia-and-the-Pacific/Bangladesh-AGRICULTURE.html. Accessed 04 Oct 2018

  2. Habib MT, Majumder A, Jakaria AZM, Akter M, Uddin MdS, Ahmed F (2018) Machine vision based papaya disease recognition. J King Saud Univ – Comput Inf Sci https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.06.006

  3. Entezari-Maleki R, Rezaei A, Minaei B (2009) Comparison of classification methods based on the type of attributes and sample size. JCIT 4:94–102. https://doi.org/10.4156/jcit.vol4.issue3.14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Robles-Granda PD, Belik I (2010) A comparison of machine learning classifiers applied to financial data sets

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li C, Wang J, Wang L, Hu L, Gong P (2014) Comparison of classification algorithms and training sample sizes in urban land classification with landsat thematic mapper imagery. Remote Sens 6:964–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaithiyanathan V, Rajeswari K, Tajane K, Pitale R (2013) Comparison of different classification techniques using different data sets. Int J Adv Eng Technol (IJAET) 6(2):769–779

    Google Scholar 

  7. Noi PT, Kappas M (2017) Comparison of random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification using sentinel-2 imagery. 22 Dec 2017

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rahman R, Afroz F (2013) Comparison of various classification techniques using different data mining tools for diabetes diagnosis. J Softw Eng Appl 6(3):85–97. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2013.63013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan PN, Steinbach M, Kumar V (2006) Introduction to data mining. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  10. Han J, Kamber M, Pei J (2012) Data mining concepts and techniques. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Logistic regression, https://www.medcalc.org/manual/logistic_regression.php. Accessed 04 Oct 2018

  12. Logistic regression, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_regression. Accessed 04 Oct 2018

  13. Rojas R (1996) Neural networks: a systematic introduction. Springer, Berlin

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson D, McNeill G (1992) Artificial neural networks technology. Contract report, for Rome laboratory, contract no. F30602-89-C-0082

    Google Scholar 

  15. Confusion matrix, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confusion_matrix. Accessed 04 Oct 2018

  16. Rozario LJ, Rahman T, Uddin MS (2016) Segmentation of the region of defects in fruits and vegetables. Int J Comput Sci Inf Secur 14(5):399–406

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Tarek Habib .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Habib, M.T., Majumder, A., Nandi, R.N., Ahmed, F., Uddin, M.S. (2020). A Comparative Study of Classifiers in the Context of Papaya Disease Recognition. In: Uddin, M., Bansal, J. (eds) Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7564-4_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics