Abstract
The industrial waste which is rich in silica and alumina activated with alkaline activators such as sodium silicate (NS) or potassium silicate combined with sodium hydroxide (NH) or potassium hydroxide forms geopolymer cement. The present investigation aims to utilize the fly ash in an innovative way that is to activate it using alkaline activators. The use of environmentally friendly cement can reduce greenhouse effect, solve disposal problems, and improve waste utilization. The main objective of this study was to investigate the effects of activator and curing conditions on the compressive strength and microstructure of alkali-activated fly ash mortar or geopolymer mortar. Two different activators were used to activate the binder such as NS and NH solutions. Six separate mixes were designed with different NaOH concentrations (8M–18M). Furthermore, the effect of the solution-to-binder ratio on the compressive strength (CS) of fly ash (FA) geopolymer mortar (GPM) was investigated. The outcome of the present study revealed that the compressive strength was found to be enhanced with NaOH concentration up to 14M, and after that, this strength reduced. Further, the compressive strength was increased up to solution-to-binder ratio of 0.6, and beyond that, this strength decreased. Heat-cured specimen was more strengthened than ambient-cured specimen.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aliabdo AA, Elmoaty MA, Salem HA (2016) Effect of water addition, plasticizer and alkaline solution constitution on fly ash based geopolymer concrete performance. Constr Build Mater 121:694–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.062
Lloyd RR, Provis JL, van Deventer JS (2009) Microscopy and microanalysis of inorganic polymer cements. 1: Remnant fly ash particles. J Mater Sci 44(2):608–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-3077-0
Kotwal AR, Kim YJ, Hu J, Sriraman V (2009) Characterization and early age physical properties of ambient cured geopolymer mortar based on class C fly ash. Int J Concr Struct Mater 9(1):35–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-014-0085-0
Okoye FN, Durgaprasad J, Singh NB (2016) Effect of silica fume on the mechanical properties of fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Ceram Int 42:3000–3006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.10.084
Reddy DV, Edouard JB, Sobhan K (2012) Durability of fly ash-based geopolymer structural concrete in the marine environment. J Mater Civ Eng 25(6):781–787. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000632
Topark-Ngarm P, Chindaprasirt P, Sata V (2014) Setting time, strength, and bond of high-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 27(7):04014198. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001157
Boonserm K, Sata V, Pimraksa K, Chindaprasirt P (2012) Improved geopolymerization of bottom ash by incorporating fly ash and using waste gypsum as additive. Cem Concr Compos 34:819–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.04.001
Chindaprasirt P, Jaturapitakkul C, Chalee W, Rattanasak U (2009) Comparative study on the characteristics of fly ash and bottom ash geopolymers. Waste Manag 29:539–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.023
Albitar M, Visintin P, Ali MMS, Drechsler M (2015) Assessing behaviour of fresh and hardened geopolymer concrete mixed with class-F fly ash. KSCE J Civ Eng 19(5):1445–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-1254-z
Part WK, Ramli M, Cheah CB (2015) An overview on the influence of various factors on the properties of geopolymer concrete derived from industrial by-products. Constr Build Mater 77:370–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.065
IS 383:1970 Indian standard code “specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
-
1.
Table 1. Elemental analysis of fly ash
-
2.
Table 2. Physical properties of fine aggregate
-
3.
Table 3. Mix proportions of geopolymer mortar
-
4.
Fig. 1. Sodium hydroxide flakes
-
5.
Fig. 2. Variation of the CS in different NH concentrations
-
6.
Fig. 3. Variation of the CS in different solution-to-FA ratios
-
7.
Fig. 4. Variation in the CS in different curing processes
-
8.
Fig. 5. SEM of geopolymer mortar with solution-to-binder ratio of 0.45
-
9.
Fig. 6. SEM of geopolymer mortar with solution-to-binder ratio of 0.5
-
10.
Fig. 7. SEM of geopolymer mortar with solution-to-binder ratio of 0.6
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jena, S., Panigrahi, R. (2020). Experimental Investigations on Fly Ash Geopolymer Mortar. In: Shukla, S., Barai, S., Mehta, A. (eds) Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials and Geotechnical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 35. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7480-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7480-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7479-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7480-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)