Abstract
This chapter reviews the rates and predictors of return to work (RTW) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in Denmark, and compares RTW rates across numerous countries. While differences can be attributed to a multitude of methodological differences, including how RTW is defined and the type of data available, we argue that countries can be roughly categorized in terms of RTW performance. The comparative assessment discusses studies from Northern European countries representing social democratic (Denmark and Norway) and conservative-corporatist models (France and the Netherlands), as well as available data from a liberal welfare state overseas (USA). Complementing studies from these Global North countries, a study from Brazil is also included. The analysis reveals that RTW is lower in Denmark and Norway compared to other countries. One plausible explanation is that the welfare state institutional setting partly exempts employers from responsibilities towards job seekers with disabilities. We address the RTW challenges for severe TBI survivors in the context of inappropriate work opportunities and an increasing requirement for highly skilled workers in the labour market. Finally, we propose potential strategies for Nordic countries to improve RTW outcomes after severe TBI.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We used the following search string: ‘Craniocerebral Trauma’ [MeSH] AND (‘Employment, Supported’ [MeSH] OR ‘Employment’ [MeSH] OR ‘Return to Work’ [MeSH] OR ‘Rehabilitation, Vocational’ [MeSH]).
- 2.
The flexicurity model is primarily associated with the Danish system, but a broader perspective on flexibility, considering not only degrees of employment protection but also the general regulatory system for doing business, suggests that all the Nordic countries are characterized by flexicurity. The flexicurity label is also applied to the Dutch case, but here the element of flexibility concerns the deregulation of part-time, fixed-term, and agency work, as well as the encouragement of leave schemes (Wilthagen and Tros 2004). These differences may be important, as we shall discuss later in this chapter.
References
Access Economics. (2009). The economic cost of spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury in Australia. Report by Access Economics for the Victorian Neurotrauma Initiative (p. 31). Canberra: Access Economics.
Andelic, N., Hammergren, N., Bautz-Holter, E., Sveen, U., Brunborg, C., & Røe, C. (2009). Functional outcome and health-related quality of life 10 years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 120(1), 16–23.
Annenkov, A., & Madaschi, C. (2005). Labour productivity in the Nordic EU countries: A comparative overview and explanatory factors 1980–2004. ECB occasional paper no. 39.
Arango-Lasprilla, J. C., Ketchum, J. M., Lewis, A. N., Krch, D., Gary, K. W., & Dodd, B. A., Jr. (2011). Racial and ethnic disparities in employment outcomes for persons with traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal investigation 1–5 years after injury. PM&R: The Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation, 3(12), 1083–1091.
Berglund, T., & Madsen, P. K. (2010). Nordic labour market and welfare systems from a flexicurity perspective. In Labour market mobility in Nordic welfare states (pp. 37–60). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
Biering, K., Hjøllund, N. H., & Lund, T. (2013). Methods in measuring return to work: A comparison of measures of return to work following treatment of coronary heart disease. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 23(3), 400–405.
Corrigan, J. D., Harrison-Felix, C., Bogner, J., Dijkers, M., Terrill, M. S., & Whiteneck, G. (2003). Systematic bias in traumatic brain injury outcome studies because of loss to follow-up. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(2), 153–160.
Corrigan, J. D., Lineberry, L. A., Komaroff, E., Langlois, J. A., Selassie, A. W., & Wood, K. D. (2007). Employment after traumatic brain injury: Differences between men and women. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88(11), 1400–1409.
Corrigan, J. D., Cuthbert, J. P., Whiteneck, G. G., Dijkers, M. P., Coronado, V., Heinemann, A. W., et al. (2012). Representativeness of the traumatic brain injury model systems national database. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 27(6), 391–403.
Cuthbert, J. P., Corrigan, J. D., Whiteneck, G. G., Harrison-Felix, C., Graham, J. E., Bell, J. M., & Coronado, V. G. (2012). Extension of the representativeness of the traumatic brain injury model systems national database: 2001 to 2010. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 27(6), E15–E27.
Dex, S., & McCulloch, A. (1998). The reliability of retrospective unemployment history data. Work, Employment and Society, 12(3), 497–509.
Diaz, A. P., Schwarzbold, M. L., Thais, M. E., Cavallazzi, G. G., Schmoeller, R., Nunes, J. C., et al. (2014). Personality changes and return to work after severe traumatic brain injury: A prospective study. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 36(3), 213–219.
Dillahunt-Aspillaga, C., Nakase-Richardson, R., Hart, T., Powell-Cope, G., Dreer, L. E., Eapen, B. C., et al. (2017). Predictors of employment outcomes in veterans with traumatic brain injury: A VA traumatic brain injury model systems study. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 32(4), 271–282.
Doctor, J. N., Castro, J., Temkin, N. R., Fraser, R. T., Machamer, J. E., & Dikmen, S. S. (2005). Workers’ risk of unemployment after traumatic brain injury: A normed comparison. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11(6), 747–752.
Donker-Cools, B. H. P. M., Daams, J. G., Wind, H., & Frings-Dresen, M. H. W. (2015). Effective return-to-work interventions after acquired brain injury: A systematic review. Brain Injury, 30(2), 1–19.
Engelstad, F. (1999). Demokrati og makt – samfunn og bedrift [Democracy and power – Society and enterprise]. In Ø. Østerud (Ed.), Mot en ny maktutredning [Towards a new investigation of power in Norway] (pp. 19–42). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Grauwmeijer, E., Heijenbrok-Kal, M. H., Haitsma, I. K., & Ribbers, G. M. (2012). A prospective study on employment outcome 3 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(6), 993–999.
Grauwmeijer, E., Heijenbrok-Kal, M. H., Haitsma, I. K., & Ribbers, G. M. (2017). Employment outcome ten years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Neurotrauma, 34(17), 2575–2581.
Griep, Y., Kinnunen, U., Nätti, J., De Cuyper, N., Mauno, S., Mäkikangas, A., & De Witte, H. (2016). The effects of unemployment and perceived job insecurity: A comparison of their association with psychological and somatic complaints, self-rated health and life satisfaction. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 89(1), 147–162.
Hankemeier, A., & Rollnik, J. D. (2015). The Early Functional Abilities (EFA) scale to assess neurological and neurosurgical early rehabilitation patients. BMC Neurology, 15(1), 207.
Harsløf, I., Scarpa, S., & Andersen, S. N. (2013). Changing population profiles and social risk structures in the Nordic countries. In I. Harsløf & R. Ulmestig (Eds.), Changing social risks and social policy responses in the Nordic welfare states (pp. 25–49). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hjollund, N. H., Larsen, F. B., & Andersen, J. H. (2007). Register-based follow-up of social benefits and other transfer payments: Accuracy and degree of completeness in a Danish interdepartmental administrative database compared with a population-based survey. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 35(5), 497–502.
International Labour Organization. (2016). Key indicators of the Labour market: Unemployment rate. https://www.ilo.org/ilostat/. Accessed 1 July 2018.
Jourdan, C., Bosserelle, V., Azerad, S., Ghout, I., Bayen, E., Aegerter, P., et al. (2013). Predictive factors for 1-year outcome of a cohort of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI): Results from the PariS-TBI study. Brain Injury, 27(9), 1000–1007.
Jourdan, C., Bayen, E., Bahrami, S., Ghout, I., Darnoux, E., Azerad, S., et al. (2016). Loss to follow-up and social background in an inception cohort of patients with severe traumatic brain injury: Results from the PariS-TBI study. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 31, E42.
Ketchum, J. M., Almaz Getachew, M., Krch, D., Banos, J. H., Kolakowsky-Hayner, S. A., Lequerica, A., et al. (2012). Early predictors of employment outcomes 1 year post traumatic brain injury in a population of Hispanic individuals. NeuroRehabilitation, 30(1), 13–22.
Ministry of Children, Gender Equality, Integration and Social Affairs. (2014). Social security. http://sm.dk/en/responsibilites/social-security. Accessed 15 June 2015.
Odgaard, L., Poulsen, I., Kammersgaard, L. P., Johnsen, S. P., & Nielsen, J. F. (2015). Surviving severe traumatic brain injury in Denmark: Incidence and predictors of highly specialized rehabilitation. Clinical Epidemiology, 7, 225–234.
Odgaard, L., Johnsen, S. P., Pedersen, A. R., & Nielsen, J. F. (2017a). Return to work after severe traumatic brain injury: A nationwide follow-up study. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 32(3), E57–E64.
Odgaard, L., Johnsen, S. P., Stubbs, P. W., Pedersen, A. R., & Nielsen, J. F. (2017b). Alternative measures reveal different but low estimates of labour market attachment after severe traumatic brain injury: A nationwide cohort study. Brain Injury, 31(10), 1–9.
Odgaard, L., Pedersen, A. R., Poulsen, I., Johnsen, S. P., & Nielsen, J. F. (2018). Return to work predictors after traumatic brain injury in a welfare state. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 137(1), 44–50.
OECD. (2006). Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers: Norway, Poland and Switzerland (Vol. 1). Paris: OECD Publishing. Tables available at: https://www.oecd.org/norway/sicknessdisabilityandworkvol1norwaypolandandswitzerland.htm
OECD. (2008). Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers: Denmark, Finland, Ireland and the Netherlands (Vol. 3). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264049826-en.
OECD. (2010a). Executive summary and policy conclusions. In Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers: A synthesis of Findings across OECD countries. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264088856-en.
OECD. (2010b). Insufficient labour market integration of people with disability. In Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers: A synthesis of finding across OECD countries. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264088856-en.
OECD. (2010c). Sickness, disability and work: Improving social and labour-market integration of people with disability. Fact sheet based on Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/els/soc/46488022.pdf
Ponsford, J. L., Downing, M. G., Olver, J., Ponsford, M., Acher, R., Carty, M., & Spitz, G. (2014). Longitudinal follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury: Outcome at two, five, and ten years post-injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 31(1), 64–77.
Sherer, M., Madison, C. F., & Hannay, H. J. (2000). A review of outcome after moderate and severe closed head injury with an introduction to life care planning. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15(2), 767–782.
Tillin, L., & Pereira, A. W. (2017). Federalism, multi-level elections and social policy in Brazil and India. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 55(3), 328–352.
Tschanz, C., & Staub, I. (2017). Disability-policy models in European welfare regimes: Comparing the distribution of social protection, labour-market integration and civil rights. Disability & Society, 32(8), 1199–1215.
Van Voorhis, R. A. (2002). Different types of welfare states? A methodological deconstruction of comparative research. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 29, 3.
Wilthagen, T., & Tros, F. (2004). The concept of ‘flexicurity’: A new approach to regulating employment and labour markets. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 10(2), 166–186.
Young, A. E., Wasiak, R., Roessler, R. T., McPherson, K. M., Anema, J. R., & van Poppel, M. N. (2005). Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: Stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 543–556.
Acknowledgements
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Odgaard, L., Harsløf, I., Stubbs, P.W. (2019). Return to Work After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Diverse Labour Market and Welfare State Contexts. In: Harsløf, I., Poulsen, I., Larsen, K. (eds) New Dynamics of Disability and Rehabilitation. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7346-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7346-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7345-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7346-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)