Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Adler, P. S., Kwon, S.-W., & Heckscher, C. (2008). Perspective–professional work: The emergence of collaborative community. Organization Science, 19(2), 359–376.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organizational structure. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217–230.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Andelic, N., Hammergren, N., Bautz-Holter, E., Sveen, U., Brunborg, C., & Røe, C. (2009). Functional outcome and health-related quality of life 10 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 120(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01116.x.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Andelic, N., Soberg, H. L., Berntsen, S., Sigurdardottir, S., & Roe, C. (2014). Self-perceived health care needs and delivery of health care services 5 years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. PM&R, 6(11), 1013–1021.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Antunes, V., & Moreira, J. P. (2011). Approaches to developing integrated care in Europe: A systematic literature review. Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare, 4(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1179/175330311X13016677137743.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Battilana, J., & D’Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 31–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Carvalho, T. (2014). Changing connections between professionalism and managerialism: A case study of nursing in Portugal. Journal of Professions and Organization, 1(2), 176–190.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Evetts, J. (2003). The sociological analysis of professionalism: Occupational change in the modern world. International Sociology, 18(2), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580903018002005.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. London: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Garrow, E. E., & Grusky, O. (2012). Institutional logic and street-level discretion: The case of HIV test counseling. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 103–131.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069285.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Gröne, O., & Garcia-Barbero, M. (2001). Integrated care: A position paper of the WHO European office for integrated health care services. International Journal of Integrated Care, 1(2), e21.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Harsløf, I., Håvold, O. K., & Slomic, M. (2019). Establishing individual care plans for rehabilitation patients: Traces of self-targeting in the Norwegian, universal welfare state. Nordic Journal of Social Research 10(1).
Google Scholar
Håvold, O. K. (2018). Opportunity talk, work talk and identity talk: Motivating strategies used by the Norwegian labour and welfare offices. Nordic Social Work Research, 8(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2017.1405836.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Håvold, O. K. (2019). All roads lead to Rome: Discretionary reasoning on medically objective injuries at the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Offices. Professions & Professionalism, 9(1). http://doi.org/10.7577/p2283.
Håvold, O. K., Harsløf, I., & Alm Andreassen, T. (2017). Externalizing an ‘asset model’ of activation: Creative institutional work by frontline workers in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service. Social Policy and Administration, 52(1), 178–196.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Kellogg, K. C. (2014). Brokerage professions and implementing reform in an age of experts. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 912–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414544734.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 215–254). London: SAGE.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Lindsay, C., & Dutton, M. (2012). Promoting healthy routes back to work? Boundary spanning health professionals and employability programmes in Great Britain. Social Policy & Administration, 46(5), 509–525.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Mur-Veeman, I., van Raak, A., & Paulus, A. (2008). Comparing integrated care policy in Europe: Does policy matter? Health Policy, 85(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.008.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Muzio, D., & Kirkpatrick, I. (2011). Introduction: Professions and organizations – A conceptual framework. Current Sociology, 59(4), 389–405.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Muzio, D., Brock, D. M., & Suddaby, R. (2013). Professions and institutional change: Towards an institutionalist sociology of the professions. Journal of Management Studies, 50(5), 699–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12030.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Nolte, E., Knai, C., & McKee, M. (Eds.). (2008). Managing chronic conditions: Experience in eight countries. Brussels/Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies/World Health Organization.
Google Scholar
Noordegraaf, M. (2007). From ‘pure’ to ‘hybrid’ professionalism: Present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains. Administration and Society, 39(6), 761–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707304434.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Noordegraaf, M. (2011). Risky business: How professionals and professional fields (must) deal with organizational issues. Organization Studies, 32(10), 1349–1371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611416748.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Noordegraaf, M. (2013). Reconfiguring professional work: Changing forms of professionalism in public services. Administration and Society, 48(7), 783–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713509242.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Phillips, N., & Oswick, C. (2012). Organizational discourse: Domains, debates, and directions. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 435–481.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2000). Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00171.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents. Organization Studies, 29(2), 219–238.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Slomic, M., Soberg, H. L., Sveen, U., & Christiansen, B. (2017). Transitions of patients with traumatic brain injury and multiple trauma between specialized and municipal rehabilitation services – Professionals’ perspectives. Cogent Medicine, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2017.1320849.
Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Los Angeles: SAGE.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Thornton, P., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Wade, D. T., & de Jong, B. A. (2000). Recent advances in rehabilitation. British Medical Journal, 320(7246), 1385–1388. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1385.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Williams, P. (2002). The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration, 80(1), 103–124.
CrossRef
Google Scholar