Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Infrastructure Delivery Systems: An Organisational Viability Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Infrastructure Delivery Systems

Part of the book series: Management in the Built Environment ((MABUEN))

  • 307 Accesses

Abstract

Advocates have continued to lament the inability of infrastructure investments in those climes to contribute to socio-economic upliftment for most of the populace. Previous studies have attributed this deficiency to improper planning, lack of relevant skills and finance, poor regulation, etc. These studies have proposed solutions, but these solutions remain at best, perfunctory as the challenges persist. One area that has been consistently overlooked is the absence of a real-time, monitoring and evaluation system entrenched within the infrastructure delivery system to provide for self-governance within the system. The process of infrastructure procurement and delivery takes place over an extensive duration. Often, monitoring and evaluation as well as an appraisal of the system’s performance is carried out upon commissioning and close out of the project. Indeed, this is considered problematic. In this chapter, a conceptual framework for performing real-time monitoring and evaluation, process control and co-ordination has been proposed. This framework is predicated on the concept of systems viability. As such, the viable systems model (VSM) is deployed towards framework development. The advantages of the VSM as well as its utility in providing a tool for diagnosing infrastructure delivery systems is highlighted in this chapter. Also, the component parts of an infrastructure delivery system, the relationship between these parts and, the influence of the nature of these relationships on the performance of the delivery systems vis-à-vis local content development policies (LCDP) implementation is discussed in more detail in the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Checkland, P. 1999. Systems thinking. In Rethinking management information systems: An interdisciplinary perspective, ed. W. Currie, R. Galliers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Espejo, R. 1994. What is systemic thinking? System Dynamics Review 10 (2–3): 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Polese, F., R. Giuseppe, and L. Carrubbo. 2009. The contribute of viable system approach in directing and managing inter-firm relationships. In 2nd annual EuroMed conference of EuroMed academy of business ‘Managerial and Entrepreneurial Developments in the Mediterranean Area’, ed. V. Demetris et al., 2052–2074. Salerno, Italy: EuroMed Press, University of Salerno.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Checkland, P. 1984. Rethinking a systems approach. In Rethinking the process of operational research & systems analysis, ed. R. Tomlinson, and I. Kiss, 43–60. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vrijhoef, R., and H. De Ridder. 2007. A systems approach for developing a model of construction supply chain integration. In Proceedings of 4th Nordic conference on construction economics and organisation: Development processes in construction management, ed. B. Atkin, and J. Borgbrant. Luleå, Sweden: Luleå University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kast, F.E., and J.E. Rosenzweig. 1972. General systems theory: Applications for organization and management. Academy of Management Journal 15 (4): 447–465.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Panagiotakopoulos, P.D. 2005. A systems and cybernetics approach to corporate sustainability in construction. Heriot-Watt University.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson, M. 1988. Systems methods for organizational analysis and design. Systems Research 5 (3): 201–210.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Leonard, A., and S. Beer. 1994. The systems perspective: Methods and models for the future. AC/UNU Project.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hill, M., and P. Hupe. 2003. The multi-layer problem in implementation research. Public Management Review 5 (4): 471–490.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pask, G. 1961. An approach to cybernetics, vol. 8. Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wood, H.L., and P. Ashton. 2010. Modelling project complexity. In Proceedings 26th annual ARCOM conference, ed. C.O. Egbu, and E.C.W. Lou. Leeds, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell, M. 2009. Complexity: A guided tour. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mason, R.B. 2007. The external environment’s effect on management and strategy: A complexity theory approach. Management Decision 45 (1): 10–28.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Baccarini, D. 1996. The concept of project complexity—A review. International Journal of Project Management 14 (4): 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gidado, K.I. 1996. Project complexity: The focal point of construction production planning. Construction Management & Economics 14 (3): 213–225.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bertelsen, S. 2003. Complexity-construction in a new perspective. In IGLC-11. Blacksburg: International Group for Lean Construction.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rhee, Y.P. 2000. Complex systems approach to the study of politics. Systems Research and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research 17 (6): 487–491.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beeson, I., and C. Davis. 2000. Emergence and accomplishment in organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management 13 (2): 178–189.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sherif, K. 2006. An adaptive strategy for managing knowledge in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management 10 (4): 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paraskevas, A. 2006. Crisis management or crisis response system? A complexity science approach to organizational crises. Management Decision 44 (7): 892–907.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Espejo, R. 2003. The viable system model: A briefing about organisational structure.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hoverstadt, P. 2008. The fractal organisation: Creating sustainable organisations with the viable system model. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schwaninger, M. 2006. Theories of viability: A comparison. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 23 (3): 337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Orengo, M. 2018. Theoretical notes regarding the practical application of Stafford Beer’s viable system model. Kybernetes 47 (2): 262–272.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schwaninger, M. 2015. Organizing for sustainability: A cybernetic concept for sustainable renewal. Kybernetes 44 (6/7): 935–954.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Beer, S. 1979. The heart of enterprise. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schwaninger, M. 2006. Design for viable organizations: The diagnostic power of the viable system model. Kybernetes 35 (7/8): 955–966.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Schwaninger, M. 2012. Making change happen: Recollections of a systems professional. Kybernetes 41 (3/4): 348–367.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Leonard, A. 2000. The viable system model and knowledge management. Kybernetes 29 (5/6): 710–715.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Espejo, R., and Z. M. Bendek. 2011. An argument for active citizenship and organisational transparency. Kybernetes 40 (3/4): 477–493.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Espejo, R. and A. Gill. 1997. The viable system model as a framework for understanding organizations. Phrontis Ltd. & SYNCHO Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rezaee, Z., et al. 2018. Application of viable system model in diagnosis of organizational structure. Systemic Practice and Action Research 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Brocklesby, J., and S. Cummings. 1996. Designing a viable organization structure. Long Range Planning 29 (1): 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pfiffner, M. 2010. Five experiences with the viable system model. Kybernetes 39 (9/10): 1615–1626.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Davies, J. 2002. Models of governance—A viable systems perspective. Australasian Journal of Information Systems 9 (2): 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schwaninger, M., and C. Scheef. 2016. A test of the viable system model: Theoretical claim vs. empirical evidence. Cybernetics and Systems 47 (7): 544–569.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Polese, F., et al. 2017. The viable system perspective of actors in eco-systems. The TQM Journal 29 (6): 783–799.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jackson, M.C. 1988. An appreciation of Stafford Beer’s ‘Viable System’viewpoint on managerial practice. Journal of Management Studies 25 (6): 557–573.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Scott, W.R., R.E. Levitt, and R.J. Orr. 2011. Global projects: Institutional and political challenges. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gallagher, K., et al. 1997. People in organisations: An active learning approach. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Packendorff, J. 1995. Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management 11 (4): 319–333.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Carroll, T.N., and R.M. Burton. 2012. A contingency approach to designing project organizations: Theory and tools. Engineering Project Organization Journal 2 (1–2): 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Child, J. 1984. Organisation: A guide to problems and practice. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Daft, R.L. 2009. Organisation theory and design. Mason, USA: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Miles, R.E., et al. 1978. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review 3 (3): 546–562.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lahdenperä, P., and T. Koppinen. 2009. Financial analysis of road project delivery systems. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction 14 (1): 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wallace, L., M. Keil, and A. Rai. 2004. How software project risk affects project performance: An investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sciences 35 (2): 289–321.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Saussier, S. 2000. Transaction costs and contractual incompleteness: The case of Électricité de France. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 42 (2): 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Nickerson, J.A., and T.R. Zenger. 2004. A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organization Science 15 (6): 617–632.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Simkoko, E. 1992. Managing international construction projects for competence development within local firms. International Journal of Project Management 10 (1): 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tawiah, P., and A. Russell. 2005. The influence of procurement mode on innovation potential in infrastructure project delivery. In Proceedings of 33rd CSCE annual conference, construction specialty conference.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Stringer, J. 1967. Operational research for “multi-organizations”. Operation Research 105–120.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies, p. 2630. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Stoker, G. 1998. Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal 50 (155): 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Türke, R.-E. 2008. Governance: Systemic foundation and framework. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Abednego, M.P., and S.O. Ogunlana. 2006. Good project governance for proper risk allocation in public–private partnerships in Indonesia. International Journal of Project Management 24 (7): 622–634.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Crawford, L.H., and J. Helm. 2009. Government and governance: The value of project management in the public sector. Project Management Journal 40 (1): 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Milward, H.B., K.G. Provan, and B.A. Else. 1993. What does the hollow state look like. Public Management: The State of the Art 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kooiman, J. 1993. Governance and governability: Using complexity, dynamics and diversity.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hill, M., and P. Hupe. 2002. Implementing public policy: Governance in theory and in practice. London, Thousand Oaks, California.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Walker, A., and C. Kwong Wing. 1999. The relationship between construction project management theory and transaction cost economics. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 6 (2): 166–176.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Williamson, O.E. 1998. The institutions of governance. The American Economic Review 88 (2): 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Jin, X.-H. 2009. Determinants of efficient risk allocation in privately financed public infrastructure projects in Australia. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 136 (2): 138–150.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Jooste, S.F., and W.R. Scott. 2012. The public–private partnership enabling field: Evidence from three cases. Administration & Society 44 (2): 149–182.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Mahalingam, A., and R.E. Levitt. 2007. Institutional theory as a framework for analyzing conflicts on global projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 133 (7): 517–528.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Barley, S.R., and P.S. Tolbert. 1997. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies 18 (1): 93–117.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Scott, W.R. 2008. Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society 37 (5): 427.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ho, S.P., et al. 2009. Model for organizational governance structure choices in construction joint ventures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 135 (6): 518–530.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Olsen, B.E., et al. 2005. Governance of complex procurements in the oil and gas industry. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 11 (1): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Esteves, A.M., et al. 2011. Enhancing the benefits of projects through local procurement. In New directions in social impact assessment: Conceptual and methodological advances, ed. F. Vanlay, and A.M. Esteves, 233. Cheltenham, UK and Massachusetts, USA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Clarkson, M.E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 92–117.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Freeman, R.E. 2004. The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik 5 (3): 228–254.

    Google Scholar 

  75. PMI. 2008. A guide to the project management body of knowledge. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Walker, D.H.T., L. Bourne, and S.M. Rowlinson. 2008. Stakeholders and the supply chain. In Procurement systems: A cross-industry project management perspective, ed. D.H.T. Walker, L. Bourne, and S.M. Rowlinson. Oxford, New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Mitchell, R.K., B.R. Agle, and D.J. Wood. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Cleland, D.I. 1998. Field guide to project management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Olander, S. 2007. Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management. Construction Management and Economics 25 (3): 277–287.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Karlsen, J.T. 2002. Project stakeholder management. Engineering Management Journal 14 (4): 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Meredith, J.R. and S.J. Mantel. 2000. Project management: A managerial approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Rowley, T.J. 1997. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 887–910.

    Google Scholar 

  83. IPIECA. 2011. Local content strategy—A guidance document for the oil and gas industry. London: IPIECA.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Leidecker, J.K., and A.V. Bruno. 1984. Identifying and using critical success factors. Long Range Planning 17 (1): 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Zhou, Q., W. Huang, and Y. Zhang. 2011. Identifying critical success factors in emergency management using a fuzzy DEMATEL method. Safety Science 49 (2): 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Rockart, J.F. 1979. Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Review 57 (2): 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Ferlie, E. 2007. Complex organisations and contemporary public sector organisations. International Public Management Journal 10 (2): 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Freund, Y.P. 1988. Critical success factors. Planning Review 16 (4): 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Pinto, J.K., and J.E. Prescott. 1988. Variations in critical success factors over the stages in the project life cycle. Journal of Management 14 (1): 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Ríos, J.P. 2012. Design and diagnosis for sustainable organisations. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Zhang, X. 2005. Critical success factors for public–private partnerships in infrastructure development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 131 (1): 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Yang, J., et al. 2009. Exploring critical success factors for stakeholder management in construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 15 (4): 337–348.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Vaidya, K., A. Sajeev, and G. Callender. 2006. Critical factors that influence e-procurement implementation success in the public sector. Journal of Public Procurement 6 (1/2): 70–99.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Babatunde, S.O., O. Akintayo, and E.A. Olusegun. 2012. Critical success factors in public-private partnership (PPP) on infrastructure delivery in Nigeria. Journal of Facilities Management 10 (3): 212–225.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Van Marrewijk, A., et al. 2008. Managing public–private megaprojects: Paradoxes, complexity, and project design. International Journal of Project Management 26 (6): 591–600.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Proctor, E., et al. 2011. Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 38 (2): 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Dessy, S. 2007. Client power, citizen participation, institutions and services delivery: Theory and Evidence with special emphasis on Africa. AERC Project on Institutions and Service Delivery.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Marshall, C., and G. Rossman. 1999. Designing qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Bernard, H.R., and G.W. Ryan. 2009. Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Morel, B., and R. Ramanujam. 1999. Through the looking glass of complexity: The dynamics of organizations as adaptive and evolving systems. Organization Science 10 (3): 278–293.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Styhre, A. 2002. Non-linear change in organizations: Organization change management informed by complexity theory. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 23 (6): 343–351.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Built Environment, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa

    Dr. Bankole Osita Awuzie

  2. School of the Built Environment, University of Salford, Manchester, UK

    Prof. Peter McDermott

Authors
  1. Dr. Bankole Osita Awuzie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Peter McDermott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bankole Osita Awuzie .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Awuzie, B.O., McDermott, P. (2019). Infrastructure Delivery Systems: An Organisational Viability Perspective. In: Infrastructure Delivery Systems. Management in the Built Environment. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7291-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7291-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7290-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7291-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation