Abstract
The ultra-deep gas reservoir in the Keshen gas field is characterized by complicated geological conditions, poor static data and gas reservoir description, making it a world-class challenge of exploration and development. To depict the characteristics of gas reservoir, long distance multi-well and multi-azimuth interference well testing in gas reservoir was carried out in Keshen gas field. Accurate multi-well interference data was acquired and verified by both positive and negative authentication. Approaches like extremal value analysis, investigation radius method, etc. are employed to analyze the tested data, which is also compared with numerical simulation outcomes. The results of investigation show that the interference signals in the developed area of Keshen Block 2 are strong, indicating that the reservoir is highly connected with natural fractures. Few faults or dominant fractures appear. The fracture permeability is above Darcy level; obvious interference signals have been detected between Wells in Keshen Block 5 and 11, which means that the two blocks are interconnected and proved to be the same gas reservoir. Results from numerical simulation show that connectivity in the west area is better than that in the east. This technology has made quantitative analysis of fractured gas reservoir a reality. It can serve a solid foundation of fine reservoir description, well location selection, well drilling and completion, and related development processes. An objective judgment on the contradictions of dynamic and static data can be achieved using this technology, which is of great significance for the effective exploration and development of ultra-depth, high pressure, and fractured tight sandstone gas reservoirs.
Copyright 2018, Shaanxi Petroleum Society.
This paper was prepared for presentation at the 2018 International Field Exploration and Development Conference in Xi’an, China, 18–20 September, 2018.
This paper was selected for presentation by the IFEDC Committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper, as presented, have not been reviewed by the IFEDC Committee and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the IFEDC Committee, its members. Papers presented at the Conference are subject to publication review by Professional Committee of Petroleum Engineering of Shaanxi Petroleum Society. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of Shaanxi Petroleum Society is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of IFEDC. Contact email: paper@ifedc.org.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Deruyck BG, Bourdet DP, Daprat G et al. Interpretation of interference tests in reservoirs with double porosity behavior theory and field examples[C]. In: Paper SPE-11025-MS presented at the SPE annual fall technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA; 26–9 Sep 1982.
Bremer RE, Hubert W, Saul V. Analytical model for vertical interference tests across low-permeability zones[J]. Soc Petrol Eng J. 1985;25(3):407–18.
Zhang XH, Jia YLU, Liu P, et al. Composite reservoir interference well testing considering wellbore storage and skin factor[J]. Southwest Pet Inst. 2005;27(1):57–63.
Obge DO, Brigham WE. A model for interference testing with wellbore storage and skin effects at both well[C].In: Paper SPE-13253-MS presented at the SPE annual fall technical conference and exhibition, Houston, USA; 16–19 Sep 1984.
Kutasov IM, Eppelbaum LV, Kagan M. Interference well testing—variable fluid flow rate[J]. Geophys Eng. 2008;5(1):86–91.
Adewole ES. Mathematical formulation of interference tests analyses procedure for horizontal and vertical wells both in a laterally infinite layered reservoir[J]. Pet Sci Technol. 2013;31(7):680–90.
Lai J, Wang GW, Chai Y, et al. Diagenetic sequence stratigraphy sharacteristics of sower cretaceous Bashijiqike formation in Kuqa Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentol Sin. 2015;33(2):394–407.
Wu GY, Zhu DF, Liang JP, et al. Main geological features and accumulation models of abnormally high-pressured gas reservoirs in Tarim Basin[J]. Pet Geol Exp. 2013;35(4):351–63.
Zheng WD, BI QF, Bai GR. Application of vertical interference test method in test oil generation[J]. Chengdu Univ (Nat Sci Ed). 2010;29(4):349–51.
Yang L, Chang ZQ, Zhu ZQ, et al. Application of numerical well test in development of Kela2 gas field[J]. Nat Gas Geosci. 2010;2(1):163167.
Liu H, Wang HX, Yang F, et al. Characteristics of pressure response in dual-porosity low permeability reservoirs[J]. Well Test. 2011;20(3):10–4.
Yan ZH, Guo KL, Li YP, et al. Interference well test with numerical simulation design and program optimization at sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs. 2015;27(2):98–102.
Chen XJ, Chen W,Duan YG, et al. The research on reservoir voronoi grid[J]. Southwest Pet Univ: Sci & Technol Ed. 2010;32(1):121–4.
Yao Y, Tang WB, Xi X, et al. Wave field analysis and recognition method of cave reservoir based on numerical simulation[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs. 2012;24(2):1–6.
Stotts GWJ, Anderson DM, Mattar L. Evaluating and developing tight gas reserves:Best practices[R]. SPE 108183; 2007.
Acknowledgements
Fund program: National science and technology major special “Development demonstration project of deep—super deep gas field in kuqa depression” (2016ZX05051).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, H., Jia, Y., Zhu, S., Qiao, X., Wang, S., Nie, Y. (2020). Applied Research and Well Interference Test Model of Ultrahigh Pressure Gas Reservoir of Keshen Gas field. In: Lin, J. (eds) Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2018. IFEDC 2018. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7127-1_78
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7127-1_78
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7126-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7127-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)