Skip to main content

Sensitivity Analysis and Stochastic History Matching of Shale Gas Production Based on Embedded Discrete Fracture Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2018 (IFEDC 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering ((SSGG))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Accurate description of fracture system is the crucial to predict the production characteristics of shale gas reservoir. In order to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of production evaluation, an embedded discrete fracture model (EDFM) is used to simulate the shale gas production. It can consider the Knudsen diffusion, non-Darcy flow, and non-instantaneous desorption. To investigate the effects of key parameters on the production, the sensitivity of these parameters is analyzed through orthogonal test analysis, which includes the fracture density, half-length, orientation and flow conductivity of primary hydraulic fractures and secondary hydraulic fractures, and the permeability of matrix. After the determination of the sensitive parameters, the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) method is used to conduct history matching and predict the production characteristics. Sensitivity results show that permeability of matrix, the number of hydraulic fracturing stages, the conduction of the primary hydraulic fractures, and the half-length of the secondary hydraulic fractures are key parameters affecting the shale gas production. The cumulative gas production is positively proportional to these parameters. The increasing ratio of cumulative gas production starts to decline when the permeability of primary hydraulic fractures reaches 0.001 mD. Before the secondary hydraulic fractures are connected, the cumulative gas production increases with the half-length of the secondary hydraulic fractures. The accurate characterization of these key parameters in the fracture system of shale gas reservoir can be achieved through history matching.

Copyright 2018, Shaanxi Petroleum Society.

This paper was prepared for presentation at the 2018 International Field Exploration and Development Conference in Xi’an, China, 18–20 September, 2018.

This paper was selected for presentation by the IFEDC Committee following the review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper, as presented, have not been reviewed by the IFEDC Committee and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the IFEDC Committee, its members. Papers presented at the Conference are subject to publication review by Professional Committee of Petroleum Engineering of Shaanxi Petroleum Society. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of Shaanxi Petroleum Society is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of IFEDC. Contact email: paper@ifedc.org.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Whimarsh L, Nash N, Upham P, et al. UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing: the role of audience, message and contextual factors on risk perceptions and policy support. Appl Energy. 2015;160:419–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Q, Chen X, Jha AN, et al. Natural gas from shale formation -the evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;30:1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuuskra V, Wicks D, Thurber J. Geologic and reservoir mechanisms controlling gas recovery from the Antrim shale. SPE24883; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng Y. Impact of water dynamics in fractures on the performance of hydraulically fractured wells in gas shale reservoirs. J Can Pet Technol. 2010;51(2):143–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cipolla CL, Lolon EP, Erdle JC, et al. Modeling well performance in shale-gas reservoirs. Presented at SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, SPE-125532; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cipolla CL, Williams MJ, Weng X, et al. Hydraulic Fracture monitoring to reservoir simulation: maximizing value. Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, SPE-133877; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Du C, Zhang X, Zhan L, et al. Modeling hydraulic fracturing induced fracture networks in shale gas reservoirs as a dual porosity system. Presented at International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, China, SPE-132180; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Long J, Gilmour P, Witherspoon PA. A model for steady fluid flow in random three-dimensional networks of disc-shaped fractures. Water Resour Res. 1985;21(8):1105–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dershowitz WS, Einstein HH. Characterizing rock joint geometry with joint system models. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 1988;21(1):21–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson CR, Witherspoon PA. Steady state flow in rigid networks of fractures. Water Resour Res. 1974;10(2):328–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cipolla CL, Lolon E, Mayerhofer MJ. Reservoir modeling and production evaluation in shale-gas reservoirs. Presented at Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, SPE-122934; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Du C, Zhang X, Melton B, et al. A workflow for integrated Barnett shale gas reservoir modeling and simulation. Presented at Latin American and Carbbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, SPE-122934; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee SH, Lough MF, Jensen CL. Hierarchical modeling of flow in naturally formations with multiple length scales. Water Resour Res. 2001;37:443–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li L, Lee SH. Efficient field-scale simulation of black oil in a naturally fractured reservoir through discrete fracture networks and homogenized media. SPE Reserv Eval Eng. 2008;11:750–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moinfar A. Development of an efficient embedded discrete fracture model for 3D compositional reservoir simulation in fractured reservoirs. SPE J., 2014;19. https://doi.org/10.2118/154246-pa.

  16. Moinfar A, Varavei A, Sepehrnoori K, et al. Development of a novel and computationally-efficient discrete-fracture model to study IOR processes in naturally fractured reservoir. In: SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium. Tulsa, Oklahoma; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li XJ, Cheng SQ, Li YZ, et al. Review on reservoir description and optimization problems with ensemble Kalman filter. Inner Mongolia Petrochem Ind. 2009;35(4):1–5 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hongshan Zhao, Tian Tian. Dynamic state estimation for power system based on an adaptive unscented Kalman filter. Power Syst Technol. 2014;38(1):3790–4 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Evensen G. Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monta Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J Geophys Res. 1994;99(C5):10143–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lorentzen RJ, Fjelde KK, Froyen J, et al. Underbalanced drilling: real time data interpretation and decision support. In: SPE/IADC Drilling Conference. Amsterdam, Netherlands: SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, SPE-00067693; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Navadal G, Mannseth T, Vefring EH. Instrumented wells and near-well reservoir monitoring through ensemble Kalman filter. In: 8th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery. Freiberg, Germany: EAGE Business Office, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Navadal G, Johnsen LM, Aanonsen SL, et al. Reservoir monitoring and cotinuous model updating using ensemble Kalman filter. SPE J. 2005;10(1):66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gu Y, Oliver DS. History matching of the Punq-S3 reservoir model using the ensemble Kalman filter. SPE J. 2005;10(02):217–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Skjervheim J, Evensen G, Aanonsen SL, et al. Incorporating 4D seismic data in reservoir simulation models using ensemble Kalman filter. SPE J. 2007;12(03):282–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aanonsen SI, Navdal G, Oliver DS, et al. The ensemble Kalman filter in reservoir engineering-a review. SPE J. 2009;14(03):393–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moinfar A, Varavei A, Sepehrnoori K, et al. Development of an efficient embedded discrete fracture model for 3D compositional reservoir simulation in fractured reservoirs. Spe J. 2014;19(2):289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dai C, Xue L, Wang W, Li X. Analysis of the influencing factors on the well performance in shale gas reservoir. Geofluids. 2017;2017(11):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Deissler R. An analysis of second-order slip flow and temperature-jump boundary conditions for rarefied gases. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1964;7(6):681–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum—Beijing (grant 2462014YJRC038), National Science and Technology Major Project (grant 2016ZX05037003 and 2017ZX05032004-002), The Sinopec Ministry of Science and Technology Basic Prospective Research Project (grant P18086-5).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xue Liang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liang, X., Wu, Y. (2020). Sensitivity Analysis and Stochastic History Matching of Shale Gas Production Based on Embedded Discrete Fracture Model. In: Lin, J. (eds) Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2018. IFEDC 2018. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7127-1_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7127-1_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7126-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7127-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics