Abstract
In this chapter, the perspective needed for examining graded impact statements is described. Such an evaluation is comprised of the examinations of various culture conditions for standardizing the microcosm N-system, the two-species cultures, the microcosm, and the mesocosm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Beyers RJ, Odum HT. Ecological microcosms. New York: Springer; 1993. 557pp.
Graney RL, Kennedy JH, Rodjers JH Jr. Aquatic mesocosm studies in ecological risk assessment. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers; 1994. 723pp.
Harris CC. Microcosms; ecology, biological implications and environmental impact. New York: Nova Publishers; 2013. 189pp.
Japan Sewage Works Association. Wastewater Examination Method -FY2012-; Tokyo, 2012.
Tanaka N, Inamori Y, Murakami K, Akamatsu T, Kurihara Y. Effect of Species Composition on Stability and Reproductivity of Small-scale Microcosm System. Water Sci Technol, 1994;30 Suppl 10:125–131.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murakami, K., Inamori, Y., Xu, K. (2020). Standardization of the Microcosm N-System. In: Inamori, Y. (eds) Microcosm Manual for Environmental Impact Risk Assessment . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6798-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6798-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6797-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6798-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)