Abstract
This chapter introduces the collection, marking out its key themes, contribution and significance. The collection’s key points of departure—place and space, interdisciplinarity, and the unsettled —are outlined. And the insights into place, space and the unsettled offered by the collection as a whole are delineated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bachelard, G. (1994). The poetics of space. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. California, United States: Stanford University Press.
Bradford, C. (2007). Unsettling narratives: Postcolonial readings of children’s literature. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Casey, E. S. (1993). Getting back into place: Toward a renewed understanding of the place-world. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Casey, E. S. (1996). How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: Phenomenological prolegomena. In S. Feld & K. H. Basso (Eds.), Senses of place. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
Casey, E. S. (2001). Body, self, and landscape: A geophilosophical inquiry into the place-world. In P. Adams, S. Hoelscher, & K. Till (Eds.), Textures of Place: Exploring Humanist Geographies: University of Minnesota Press. Minnesota: Minneapolis.
Certeau, Md. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Trans. Steven Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cresswell, T. (2014). Place: An introduction. Chichester: Wiles & Sons.
Derry, S. J., & Schunn, C. D. (2005). Interdisciplanrity: A beautiful but dangerous beast. In S. J. Derry, C. D. Schunn, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Interdisciplianry collaboration: An emerging cognitive science (p. 362). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence and Erlbaum Associates. xf.
Dovey, K. (2010). Becoming places: Urbanism/architecture/identity/power. London: Routledge.
Emberley, P. (1989). Places and stories: The challenge of technology. Social research: An international quarterly on work., 56(3), 741–785.
Ermarth, E. D. (2011). History in the discursive condition: Reconsidering the tools of thought. London: Routledge.
Fish, S. (1989). Being interdisciplinary is so very hard to do. Profession. 15–22.
Greenhill, P., & Tye, D. (Eds.). (2014). Unsettling assumptions: Tradition, gender, drag. Logan: Utah State University Press.
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Heidegger, M. (1953/1996). Being and time, a translation of Sein and Zeit (J. Stambaugh, Trans). New York: State University Press of New York.
Jacobs, J. M. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Jacobs, J. A., & Frickle, S. (2009). Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 43–65.
Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: The University Press of Virginia.
Klein, J. T. (2005). Humanity culture and interdisciplinarity: The changing American academy. New York: SUNY Press.
Kuttainen, V. (2010). Unsettling stories: Settler postcolonialism and the short story composite. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Lefebvre, H. (1991).The production of space. (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans). Blackwell Publishers: Oxford.
Lynch, J., Rowlands, J., Gale, T., & Skourdoumbis, A. (Eds.). (2016). Practice theory and education: Diffractive readings in professional practice. London: Routledge.
Malpas, J. E. (1999). Place and experience: A philosophical topography. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Malpas, J. E. (2013). Thinking topographically: Place, space, and geography. http://jeffmalpas.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Thinking-Topographically-Place-Space-and-Geography.pdf.
Mankekar, P. (2015). Unsettling India: Affect, temporality. Transnationality: Duke University Press, Durham.
Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.
Massey, D. (2009a). Responsibilities over distance. In J. Kenway & J. Fahey (Eds.), Globalizing the research imagination (pp. 73–87). New York, NY: Routledge.
Massey, D. (2009b). The possibilities of a politics of place beyond place? A conversation with Doreen Massey. In S. Bond & D. Featherstone (Eds.), Scottish Geographical Journal, 125, 401–420.
Maza, S. (2006). Interdisciplinarity: (Why) is it still an issue? Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 12, 3–17.
Moran, J. (2010). Interdisciplinarity (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Nieuwenhuis, M., & Crouch, D. (Eds). (2017). The question of space: Interrogating the spatial turn between disciplines. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Taylor, A. (Eds.). (2015). Unsettling the colonial places and spaces of early childhood education. London: Taylor & Francis.
Pearson, D. (2001). The politics of ethnicity in settler societies: States of unease. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Raban, J. (1974). Soft city. London: Hamilton.
Repko, A. F., Newell, W. H., & Szostak, R. (2012). Case studies in interdisciplinary research. London: Sage.
Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., & Rizzo, A. (2005). Interdisciplinarity: An emergent or engineered process? In S. J. Derry, C. D. Schunn, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity: An emergent or engineered process? (pp. 265–285). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.
Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Oxford: Blackwell.
Soja, E. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Somerville, M. (1999). Body/Landscape journals. Melbourne, Victoria: Spinifex Press.
Somerville, M. (2010). A place pedagogy for ‘Global Contemporaneity’. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(3), 326–344.
Stasiulis, D., & Yuval-Davis, N. (Eds.). (1995). Unsettling settler societies: Articulations of gender, race, ethnicity and class. London: Sage.
Strober, M. (2011). Interdisciplinary conversations: Challenging habits of thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Sugars, C. C., & Turcotte, G. (Eds.). (2009). Unsettled remains: Canadian literature and the postcolonial Gothic. Waterloo: WLU Press.
Tompkins, J. (2006). Unsettling space: Contestations in contemporary Australian theatre. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vickers, J. (2003). Diversity, globalization, and “Growing Up Digital”: Navigating interdisciplinarity in the twenty-first century. History of Intellectual Culture., 3(1), 1–19.
Warf, B., & Arias, S. (2008). The spatial turn: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Hobokin, US: Taylor and Francis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pinto, S., Hannigan, S., Walker-Gibbs, B., Charlton, E. (2019). Interdisciplinary Unsettlings of Place and Space. In: Pinto, S., Hannigan, S., Walker-Gibbs, B., Charlton, E. (eds) Interdisciplinary Unsettlings of Place and Space. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6729-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6729-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6728-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6729-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)