Skip to main content

Combining Machine Learning and Statistical Disclosure Control to Promote Open Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Mining (AusDM 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 996))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We proposed machine learning-oriented statistical disclosure control as a novel solution for New Zealand Transport Agency to release more person-related variables in its open crash data for privacy-preserving data mining. Instead of making arbitrary decisions in variable aggregation and using perturbation to guard against reidentification attacks at the cost of data distortion, we creatively drew upon feature engineering and dimensionality reduction techniques such as correspondence analysis to make evidence-based data manipulation without distortion. In addition, we built random forest classifiers along the way to directly monitor the impact of our data manipulation on users’ modelling, rather than relying on traditional utility metrics such as information loss and difference of eigenvalues that are less interpretable for users. The dataset produced using our method satisfied 10-anonymity based on 11 quasi-identifiers, with less than 3% suppression, compared with only 3-anonymity based on no more than 8 quasi-identifiers with far more than 3% suppression commonly reported in literature. Furthermore, our method enabled random forest classifier to achieve 0.996 for AUC and 0.895 for F-score in predicting crash severity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Skinner, C.: Statistical disclosure control for survey data. In: Handbook of Statistics, pp. 381–396. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sweeney, L., Samarati, P.: Protecting privacy when disclosing information: k-anonymity and its enforcement through generalization and suppression, Computer Science Laboratory, SRI International (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elliot, M.J., Manning, A., Mayes, K., Gurd, J., Bane, M.: SUDA: a program for detecting special uniques. In: Joint UNECE/Eurostat Work Session on Statistical Data Confidentiality, Geneva (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mateo-Sanz, J.M., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Sebé, F.: Probabilistic information loss measures in confidentiality protection of continuous microdata. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 11(2) 181–193 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Templ, M., Kowarik, A., Meindl, B.: Statistical disclosure control for micro-data using the R package sdcMicro. J. Stat. Softw. 67(1), 1–36 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. NZTA, Crash Analysis System (CAS). https://www.nzta.govt.nz/safety/safety-resources/crash-analysis-system

  7. Kursa, M.B., Rudnicki, W.R.: Boruta. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Boruta/index.html

  8. Ho, T.K.: Random decision forests. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357(2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kassambara, A.: Practical Guide to Cluster Analysis in R: Unsupervised Machine Learning, STHDA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bendixen, M.: A practical guide to the use of correspondence analysis in marketing research. Mark. Bull. 14, 16–38 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jaro, M.A.: Advances in record linkage methodology as applied to the 1985 census of Tampa Florida. Stat. Med. 14, 491–498 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Winkler, W.E.: String comparator metrics and enhanced decision rules in the fellegi-sunter model of record linkage. In: Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.: Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022(2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Machanavajjhala, A., Gehrke, J., Kifer, D., Venkitasubramaniam, M.: L-diversity: privacy beyond k-anonymity. In: 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2006) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nasca Peng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Peng, N. (2019). Combining Machine Learning and Statistical Disclosure Control to Promote Open Data. In: Islam, R., et al. Data Mining. AusDM 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 996. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6661-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6661-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6660-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6661-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics