Advertisement

Resilient Cities, User-Driven Planning, and Open Data Policy

  • Paul BurtonEmail author
  • Anne Tiernan
  • Malcolm Wolski
  • Lex Drennan
  • Lochlan Morrissey
Chapter

Abstract

We present a framework for user-driven planning that links disaster management policy and legislation, Open Data, and individual households and residents, focusing on Queensland. Relating open datasets to a practical model of planning reveals two major problems with currently available data. First, they are fragmented, and so multiple datasets maintained by different agencies must be consulted for a user to be able to obtain a holistic view of their risk. Second, the use of the data generally requires some expertise in data analysis. We propose that narrative policy analysis may ameliorate this problem, by presenting data (a) in amalgamated platforms that combine data of various hazards and risks; and (b) so that the user is positioned in a ‘resilience narrative’, and their disaster risk is more readily understood.

Keywords

Disaster planning Open Data Amalgamated data platforms Policy narratives 

Abbreviation

UDP

User Driven Planning

References

  1. Aida, J., Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. V., & Kondo, K. (2013). Disaster, social capital and health. In I. Kawachi, S. Takao, & S. V. Subramanian (Eds.), Global perspectives on social capital and health (pp. 167–188).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254–269.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alkon, A. H. (2004). Place stories and consequences: Heritage narratives and the control of erosion on Lake County, California, Vineyards. Organization & Environment, 17(2), 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alpaslan, C. M., Green, S. E., & Mitroff, I. I. (2009). Corporate governance in the context of crises: Towards a stakeholder theory of crisis management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 17(1), 38–49.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2009.00555.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Attorney-General’s Department. (2012). National disaster relief and recovery arrangements: Determination 2012, version 2.0. Canberra: Attorney General’s Department.Google Scholar
  7. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Regional population growth, Australia, 2015–16.Google Scholar
  8. Boin, A., & ‘t Hart, P. (2010). Organising for effective emergency management: Lessons from research. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(4), 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boin, A., ‘t Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2005). The politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, L. (1999). Mission improbable: Using fantasy documents to tame disaster. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Comfort, L. K., & Kapucu, N. (2006). Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: The World Trade Center attacks, September 11, 2001. Natural Hazards, 39(2), 309–327.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-0030-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corvellec, H. (2011). The narrative structure of risk accounts. Risk Management, 13(3), 101–121.  https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2011.5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowan, T., Purich, A., Perkins, S., Pezza, A., Boschat, G., & Sadler, K. (2014). More frequent, longer, and hotter heat waves for Australia in the twenty-first century. Journal of Climate, 27(15), 5851–5871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deloitte Access Economics. (2013). Building our nation’s resilience to natural disasters. Sydney: Deloitte Access Economics.Google Scholar
  15. Deloitte Access Economics. (2016). The economic cost of the social impact of natural disasters. Sydney: Deloitte Access Economics.Google Scholar
  16. Drennan, L. (2017). Community narratives of disaster risk and resilience: Implications for government policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(3), 456–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Drennan, L., McGowan, J., & Tiernan, A. (2016). Integrating recovery within a resilience framework: Empirical insights and policy implications from regional Australia. Politics and Governance, 4(4), 74.  https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i4.741 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emergency Management Australia. (2004). Emergency management in Australia: Concepts and principles. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  19. Emergency Management Australia. (2015). National Emergency Risk Assessment Guidelines (NERAG) Handbook. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from https://knowledge.aidr.org.au/resources/handbook-10-national-emergency-risk-assessment-guidelines/ Google Scholar
  20. Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fiskaa, H. (2005). Past and future for public participation in Norwegian physical planning. European planning studies, 13(1), 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics & Society, 29(1), 5–41.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329201029001002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldsmith, S., & Eggers, W. D. (2003). Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. New York, NY: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hampton, G. (2005). Enhancing public participation through narrative analysis. Policy Sciences, 37(3–4), 261–276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-005-1763-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hampton, G. (2009). Narrative policy analysis and the integration of public involvement in decision making. Policy Sciences, 42(3), 227–242.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9087-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hansson, S. O. (2010). Risk: Objective or subjective, facts or values. Journal of Risk Research, 13(2), 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henly-Shepard, S., Anderson, C., Burnett, K., Cox, L. J., Kittinger, J. N., & Ka’aumoana, M. (2015). Quantifying household social resilience: A place-based approach in a rapidly transforming community. Natural Hazards, 75, 343–363.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1328-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henwood, K., Pidgeon, N., Parkhill, K., & Simmons, P. (2010). Researching risk: Narrative, biography, subjectivity. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1438/2925
  29. Ho, M.-C., Shaw, D., Lin, S., & Chiu, Y.-C. (2008). How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception. Risk Analysis, 28(3), 635–643.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01040.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ISO. (2009). Risk management—Principles and guidelines (Vol. ISO 31000). Geneva: International Standards Organization.Google Scholar
  31. ISO. (2014). Societal security—Business continuity management systems—Requirements (Vol. ISO22301:2014). Geneva: International Standards Organization.Google Scholar
  32. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  33. Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kapucu, N., & Garayev, V. (2011). Collaborative decision-making in emergency and disaster management. International Journal of Public Administration, 34, 366–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kapucu, N., Hawkins, C. V., & Rivera, F. I. (2013). Emerging research in disaster resiliency and sustainability: Implications for policy and practice. In N. Kapucu, C. V. Hawkins, & F. I. Rivera (Eds.), Disaster resiliency: Interdisciplinary perspectives. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Larkham, P. J., & Lilley, K. D. (2012). Exhibiting the city: Planning ideas and public involvement in wartime and early post-war Britain. The Town Planning Review, 83(6), 647–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2000). Household seismic hazard adjustment adoption. Risk Analysis, 20(1), 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McBeth, M. K., Shanahan, E. A., Arnell, R. J., & Hathaway, P. L. (2007). The intersection of narrative policy analysis and policy change theory. The Policy Studies Journal, 35(1), 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McComas, K., & Shanahan, J. (1999). Telling stories about global climate change: Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research, 26(1), 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Menapace, L., Colson, G., & Raffaelli, R. (2012). Risk aversion, subjective beliefs, and farmer risk management strategies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(2), 384–389.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aas107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Paton, D. (2005). Community resilience: Integrating hazard management and community engagement. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engaging Communities, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  42. Paton, D., Smith, L., Daly, M., & Johnston, D. (2008). Risk perception and volcanic hazard mitigation: Individual and social perspectives. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 172(3), 179–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Purich, A., Cowan, T., Cai, W., van Rensch, P., Uotila, P., Pezza, A., …, Perkins, S. (2014). Atmospheric and oceanic conditions associated with southern Australian heat waves: A CMIP5 analysis. Journal of Climate, 27(20), 7807–7829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Maine: Duke University Press Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shaw, R. (2013). Incorporating resilience of rural communities for proactive risk reduction in Shikoku, Japan. In Disaster resiliency: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 207–226).Google Scholar
  46. Sjöberg, L. (2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 20(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tiernan, A., McGowan, J., & Drennan, L. (2013). From disaster to renewal: The centrality of business recovery to community resilience. Canberra: Regional Australia Institute.Google Scholar
  48. Tierney, K. (2012). Foreword. In N. Kapucu, C. V. Hawkins, & F. I. Rivera (Eds.), Disaster resiliency: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. xiii–xxvi). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Waugh, W. (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 132–140.Google Scholar
  50. Waugh, W. (2009). Mechanisms for collaboration in emergency management: ICS, NIMS, and the problem with command and control. In R. O’Leary & L. B. Bingham (Eds.), The collaborative public manager: New ideas for the twenty-first century (pp. 157–176). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Waugh, W., & Streib, G. (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wise, C. R., & Nader, R. (2002). Organizing the federal system for homeland security: Problems, issues, and dilemmas. Public Administration Review, 62, 44–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zheng, F., Westra, S., & Leonard, M. (2015). Opposing local precipitation extremes. Nature Climate Change, 5(5), 389–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Burton
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anne Tiernan
    • 2
  • Malcolm Wolski
    • 3
  • Lex Drennan
    • 4
  • Lochlan Morrissey
    • 4
  1. 1.Cities Research Institute, Griffith UniversityGold CoastAustralia
  2. 2.Griffith Business School, Griffith UniversityNathanAustralia
  3. 3.eResearch Services, Griffith UniversityNathanAustralia
  4. 4.Policy Innovation Hub, Griffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations